journal article·2023-12-01Open access

Characterization of Cycle-Aged Commercial NMC and NCA Lithium-ion Cells: I. Temperature-Dependent Degradation

Reed Wittman, Matthieu Dubarry, Sergei Ivanov, Benjamin W. Juba, Jessica Romàn-Kustas, Armando Fresquez, Jill Langendorf, Richard Grant, Gretchen Taggart, Babu Chalamala, Yuliya Preger

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in applications from consumer electronic devices to stationary energy storage. Appropriate management of batteries is challenging due to limited data on their performance and materials degradation. Previous studies have focused on characterization of single cells under specific operating conditions. In the present work, commercial 18650 lithium-ion cells with LiNixMnyCo1-x-yO2 (NMC) and LiNixCoyAl1-x-yO2 (NCA) positive electrodes were characterized by a wide range of electrochemical and materials techniques after cycling at 15, 25, or 35 °C to ∼80% capacity. The NCA cells exhibit weak temperature dependence in their cycle aging and materials degradation. The NMC cells exhibited increased capacity fade and materials degradation as ambient temperature decreased. All cells exhibited loss of lithium inventory as their primary degradation mode. However, the NCA cells only showed evidence of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth whereas the NMC cells showed signs of Li plating at 15 °C, transitioning to SEI growth at 35 °C. The NMC cells displayed signs of loss of active material at the positive electrode at lower temperatures, suggesting that Li plating is correlated to additional processes that increase the rate of degradation. These results highlight the importance of avoiding broad generalizations about Li-ion battery temperature dependence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Preger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/abae37 ↗
2. Preger · 12/1/2023
3. Waldmann · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 262 · 12910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.112 ↗
4. Hayashi · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 16110.1149/2.056406jes ↗
5. Pastor-Fernández · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 360 · 30110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.042 ↗
6. Ansean · IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. · 2019 · 55 · 299210.1109/TIA.2019.2891213 ↗
7. Pastor-Fernández · Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. · 2019 · 109 · 13810.1016/j.rser.2019.03.060 ↗
8. Dubarry · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 219 · 20410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016 ↗
9. Birkl · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 341 · 37310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 ↗
10. Pfrang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 16610.1149/2.0551914jes ↗
11. Stiaszny · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 6110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.019 ↗
12. Illig · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 239 · 67010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.020 ↗
13. Schmidt · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 534210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.121 ↗
14. Zhang · Electrochim. Acta · 2004 · 49 · 105710.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.016 ↗
15. Dubarry · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 40810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.052 ↗
16. Dubarry · Front. Energy Res. · 2022 · 10 · 110.3389/fenrg.2022.1023555 ↗
17. Ratynski · Molecules · 2020 · 25 · 409310.3390/molecules25184093 ↗
18. He · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 2310.1002/adma.201102568 ↗
19. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 297 · 110910.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.194 ↗
20. Sturm · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 412 · 20410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.043 ↗
21. Zilberman · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 425 · 21710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.109 ↗
22. Xia · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 480 · 41010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.207 ↗
23. Buchberger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 16210.1149/2.0721514jes ↗
24. Lee · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 374 · 3110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.021 ↗
25. Paul · J. Energy Storage · 2018 · 17 · 38310.1016/j.est.2018.03.016 ↗
26. Sørensen · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 661110.1021/acsaem.0c00779 ↗
27. Li · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · 2019 · 3 · 4310.1007/s41918-019-00053-3 ↗
28. Li · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 16210.1149/2.1011507jes ↗
29. Li · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 16510.1149/2.0491811jes ↗
30. Genieser · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 373 · 17210.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.014 ↗
31. Goonetilleke · Chem. Mater. · 2018 · 31 · 37610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03525 ↗
32. Hwang · Chem. Mater. · 2015 · 2710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02457 ↗
33. Wheatcroft · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 310.1021/acsaem.0c01333 ↗
34. Friesen · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 342 · 8810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.040 ↗
35. Börger · J. Energy Storage · 2017 · 13 · 30410.1016/j.est.2017.07.026 ↗
36. Pfrang · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 392 · 16810.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.065 ↗
37. Maheshwari · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 273 · 33510.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.045 ↗
38. Waldmann · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 178 · 52510.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.056 ↗
39. Wittman · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2023