A Solvent-Free Process Enabled by Polytetrafluoroethlyene/Carbon Black Composites for Fabricating Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries with a High Volumetric Energy
Source abstract
Abstract
Manufacturing electrodes for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) consists of making a slurry, coating the slurry onto a current collector, drying the slurry to remove the solvent, and calendaring the electrode. Cathodes for LIBs are fabricated by a wet process using a toxic chemical, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). However, it is preferable to use a dry process without toxic chemicals, and with fewer manufacturing operations, which saves money. However, the powder-mixing step of the dry process makes it difficult to ensure a uniform distribution of the carbonaceous conducting agents and binder used, which agglomerate in the dry mixed product. To solve this problem, we fabricate a composite of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and carbon black (CB) nanoparticles. The electrode fabricated using the PTFE/CB composite has a 98 wt% active material content and 3.8 g cc−1 of electrode density. An electrode produced by the conventional wet process using a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder and NMP solvent has a 96 wt% active material content and an electrode density of 3.4 g cc−1. The dry-processed electrode has a higher volumetric capacity (760 mAh cc−1) as well as a higher discharge rate capability and cycle life than a conventional wet-processed electrode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Wakihara · Mater. Scie. Eng. R Rep. · 2001 · 33 · 10910.1016/S0927-796X(01)00030-4 ↗
2. Vetter · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 147 · 26910.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
3. Manthiram · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 37310.1021/jz2001216 ↗
4. Lee · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2016 · 9 · 215210.1039/C6EE01134A ↗
5. Wang · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 286 · 33010.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.164 ↗
6. Lu · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 226 · 27210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 ↗
7. Zubi · Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. · 2018 · 89 · 29210.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 ↗
8. Kwade · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 29010.1038/s41560-018-0130-3 ↗
9. Niri · J. Clean. Prod. · 2021 · 324 · 12927210.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129272 ↗
10. Karaki · Energy Technol. · 2022 · 11 · 220103210.1002/ente.202201032 ↗
11. Kraytsberg · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2016 · 6 · 160065510.1002/aenm.201600655 ↗
12. Goncalves · Electrochem. Commun. · 2022 · 13510.1016/j.elecom.2022.107210 ↗
13. Chang · Carbon Energy · 2021 · 3 · 47310.1002/cey2.84 ↗
14. Bauer · Ceram. Int. · 2014 · 40 · 459110.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.137 ↗
15. Ahmed · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 322 · 16910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.102 ↗
16. Nelson · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 283 · 50610.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.142 ↗
17. Li · IScience · 2020 · 23 · 10108110.1016/j.isci.2020.101081 ↗
18. 11.12.2019
19. Sliz · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 5 · 404710.1021/acsaem.1c02923 ↗
20. Dai · 2019
21. Kumberg · Energy Technol. · 2019 · 7 · 190072210.1002/ente.201900722 ↗
22. Font · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 393 · 17710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.097 ↗
23. Zhang · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 12 · 210223310.1002/aenm.202102233 ↗
24. Ludwig · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2315010.1038/srep23150 ↗
25. Shin · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2022 · 46 · 1606110.1002/er.8266 ↗
26. Lu · Matter · 2022 · 5 · 87610.1016/j.matt.2022.01.011 ↗
27. Haarmann · Energy Technol. · 2020 · 8 · 180116910.1002/ente.201801169 ↗
28. Bockholt · Powder Technol. · 2016 · 297 · 26610.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.011 ↗
29. Harris · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 648110.1021/jp311431z ↗
30. Dominko · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 119 · 77010.1016/S0378-7753(03)00250-7 ↗
31. Guy · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 157 · 43810.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.07.036 ↗
32. Sui · Phys. E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures · 2006 · 33 · 30810.1016/j.physe.2006.03.151 ↗
33. Garmann · J. Virol. · 2014 · 88 · 1047210.1128/JVI.01044-14 ↗
34. Russo · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 473510.1021/jp004583a ↗
35. Kim · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 1010.1002/aenm.201903658 ↗
36. Cruz-León · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2022 · 126 · 864610.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04488 ↗
37. Jeynes · NSTI Nanotech · 2005 · 1 · 250
38. Wang · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 489010.1021/nn101208m ↗
39. Zaremba · Carbon · 2019 · 151 · 17510.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.076 ↗
40. Jeynes · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 159810.1002/adma.200600362 ↗
41. Liu · Langmuir · 2014 · 30 · 1510210.1021/la5038469 ↗
42. Liu · Adv. Chem. Engineer. Sci. · 2014 · 4 · 51510.4236/aces.2014.44053 ↗
43. Kraytsberg · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2016 · 610.1002/aenm.201600655 ↗
44. Draper · Rna · 2004 · 10 · 33510.1261/rna.5205404 ↗
45. Koenig · J. Chem. Phys. · 1969 · 50 · 282310.1063/1.1671470 ↗
46. Dresselhaus · Phys. Rep. · 2005 · 409 · 4710.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 ↗
47. Pawlyta · Carbon · 2015 · 84 · 47910.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.030 ↗
48. Chen · RSC Adv. · 2019 · 910.1039/C9RA06191F ↗
49. Huang · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 7 · 317210.1166/jnn.2007.687 ↗
50. Cui · Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. · 2003 · 29 · 68910.1081/DDC-120021318 ↗
51. Swadling · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 299010.1039/C7CP06355E ↗
52. Yang · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 610.1039/C6RA10622F ↗
53. Ogihara · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 461210.1021/jp512564f ↗
54. Bisquert · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 2 · 418510.1039/b001708f ↗
55. Itou · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2020 · 124 · 555910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11929 ↗
56. Elgrishi · J. Chem. Educ. · 2018 · 95 · 19710.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361 ↗
57. Li · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1458910.1038/ncomms14589 ↗