Evaluation of Large-Format Lithium-Ion Cell Thermal Runaway Response Triggered by Nail Penetration using Novel Fractional Thermal Runaway Calorimetry and Gas Collection Methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
To simultaneously optimize the battery design, reduce risk, and maintain safety margin, it is important to design from the ground up based on test determined cell-specific thermal runaway behavior as a function of heat output and analysis of the expelled gases. These data will inform the analytical models used for design optimization. Here we analyze the thermal runaway behavior of the 134 A-h GS Yuasa Li-ion cell (LSE134) using a novel large format fractional thermal runaway calorimeter and gas collection methodology. Results indicate an average total thermal runaway energy yield of 2.86 MJ, or 1.6 times the stored electrochemical energy; this follows an assertion commonly found in literature that energy yield scales linearly with capacity. The average fractional energy distribution was 2% through the cell body, 53% through the electrode winding, and 45% through the ejecta material and gases. Lot-to-lot variability in heat output was also identified. Additionally, it was found that an average of 416.6 SL of gas was generated which is approximately 3.1 l A-h −1 . The exhaust gas was determined to be a mixture of carbon dioxide, methane, ethane, oxygen, hydrogen, and other short chain hydrocarbons. Carbon dioxide was the largest component by volume with a range of 41% to 52% followed by hydrogen which ranged from 28% to 41%. Larger cells appear to result in strong ejecta flow driven events with higher fractions of the total energy delivered via the flow as compared to smaller format Li-ion cells (e.g. 18650 and 21700).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. The lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 ↗
2. Li-ion battery materials: Present and future10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
3. Li ion batteries for space applications10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00584-5 ↗
4. Miller · 2014
5. Building better batteries10.1038/451652a ↗
6. A critical review of thermal issues in lithium-ion batteries10.1149/1.3515880 ↗
7. A general discussion of li ion battery safety
8. Safety mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.002 ↗
9. A review of hazards associated with primary lithium and lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.psep.2011.06.022 ↗
10. Quintiere · 2016
11. Bragg · 2017 · 124
12. Experimental analysis of thermal runaway and propagation in lithium-ion battery modules10.1149/2.0921509jes ↗
13. Preventing cell-to-cell propagation of thermal runaway in lithium-ion batteries10.1149/1945-7111/ab6ff0 ↗
14. Failure propagation in multi-cell lithium ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.081 ↗
15. Investigating the role of energy density in thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries with accelerating rate calorimetry10.1149/1945-7111/ac0699 ↗
16. Haynes · 2016
17. Challenges with achieving 180 Wh/kg Li-ion battery modules that don’t propagate thermal runaway or emit flames/sparks
18. Decoupling of heat generated from ejected and non-ejected contents of 18650-format lithium-ion cells using statistical methods10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.099 ↗
19. Modelling and experiments to identify high-risk failure scenarios for testing the safety of lithium-ion cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.077 ↗
20. The effect of cell geometry and trigger method on the risks associated with thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230645 ↗
21. Graika · 2017
22. Investigation on the fire-induced hazards of Li-ion battery cells by fire calorimetry10.1039/C1EE02218K ↗
23. In-depth safety-focused analysis of solvents used in electrolytes for large scale lithium ion batteries10.1039/c3cp51315g ↗
24. An experimental study on burning behaviors of 18650 lithium ion batteries using a cone calorimeter10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.039 ↗
25. Yuasa
26. Reducing cell-to-cell spacing for large-format lithium ion battery modules with aluminum or PCM heat sinks under failure conditions10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.094 ↗
27. Thermal runaway features of large format prismatic lithium ion battery using extended volume accelerating rate calorimetry10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.005 ↗
28. Thermal runaway and fire behaviors of large-scale lithium ion batteries with different heating methods10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.06.007 ↗
29. Comprehensive gas analysis on large scale automotive lithium-ion cells in thermal runaway10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.051 ↗
30. Identifying the cause of rupture of li-ion batteries during thermal runaway
31. Correlative acoustic time-of-flight spectroscopy and X-ray imaging to investigate gas-induced delamination in lithium-ion pouch cells during thermal runaway10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228039 ↗
32. Battery failure databank
33. Prevention of lithium-ion battery thermal runaway using polymer-substrate current collectors10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100360 ↗
34. How electrolytes influence battery safety10.1149/2.F04122if ↗
35. Orendorff · 2016
36. Detailed characterization of particle emissions from battery fires10.1080/02786826.2021.2018399 ↗