Editors’ Choice—AutoEIS: Automated Bayesian Model Selection and Analysis for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) is a powerful tool for electrochemical analysis; however, its data can be challenging to interpret. Here, we introduce a new open-source tool named AutoEIS that assists EIS analysis by automatically proposing statistically plausible equivalent circuit models (ECMs). AutoEIS does this without requiring an exhaustive mechanistic understanding of the electrochemical systems. We demonstrate the generalizability of AutoEIS by using it to analyze EIS datasets from three distinct electrochemical systems, including thin-film oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysis, corrosion of self-healing multi-principal components alloys, and a carbon dioxide reduction electrolyzer device. In each case, AutoEIS identified competitive or in some cases superior ECMs to those recommended by experts and provided statistical indicators of the preferred solution. The results demonstrated AutoEIS’s capability to facilitate EIS analysis without expert labels while diminishing user bias in a high-throughput manner. AutoEIS provides a generalized automated approach to facilitate EIS analysis spanning a broad suite of electrochemical applications with minimal prior knowledge of the system required. This tool holds great potential in improving the efficiency, accuracy, and ease of EIS analysis and thus creates an avenue to the widespread use of EIS in accelerating the development of new electrochemical materials and devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Etacheri · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 324310.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
2. Taylor · Npj Mater Degrad · 2018 · 2 · 610.1038/s41529-018-0027-4 ↗
3. Ormerod · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2003 · 32 · 1710.1039/b105764m ↗
4. Tahir · Nano Energy · 2017 · 37 · 13610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.022 ↗
5. Eftekhari · Int J Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 1105310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.125 ↗
6. Liu · J Mater Chem A Mater · 2020 · 8 · 354110.1039/C9TA11966C ↗
7. Jain · APL Mater. · 2013 · 110.1063/1.4812323 ↗
8. Saal · JOM · 2013 · 65 · 150110.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
9. Green · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 910.1063/1.4803530 ↗
10. Pilania · Sci Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 110.1038/srep02810 ↗
11. Ong · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 68 · 31410.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
12. 2011
13. Aspuru-Guzik · 2018
14. Chang · Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry · 2010 · 3 · 20710.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.102211 ↗
15. Amirudin · Prog. Org. Coat. · 1995 · 26 · 110.1016/0300-9440(95)00581-1 ↗
16. Ribeiro · Constr. Build. Mater. · 2016 · 111 · 9810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.047 ↗
17. Scully · 1993
18. Mansfeld · Electrochim Acta · 1990 · 35 · 153310.1016/0013-4686(90)80007-B ↗
19. Park · Anal. Chem. · 2003 · 75 · 455A10.1021/ac0313973 ↗
20. Ciucci · Electrochem · 2019 · 13 · 13210.1016/j.coelec.2018.12.003 ↗
21. Harrington · Electrochim. Acta · 2011 · 56 · 800510.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.067 ↗
22. Wang · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · 2021 · 1 · 4110.1038/s43586-021-00039-w ↗
23. McCalla · Can. J. Chem. · 2022 · 100 · 13210.1139/cjc-2021-0111 ↗
24. Papac · J Mater Chem A Mater · 2023 · 11 · 526710.1039/D2TA01736A ↗
25. Duan · ACS Comb Sci · 2013 · 15 · 27310.1021/co4000375 ↗
26. Macdonald · Electrochimica Acta · 2006 · 51 · 137610.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.107 ↗
27. Macdonald · 2018
28. Taylor · Corrosion · 1995 · 51 · 66410.5006/1.3293628 ↗
29. Meland · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 2138010.1021/jp050635q ↗
30. Hu · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 198 · 35910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.013 ↗
31. An evolutionary approach for modeling the equivalent circuit for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy10.1109/CEC.2003.1299893 ↗
32. Arpaia · 2006 · p. 178610.1109/IMTC.2006.328250 ↗
33. Arpaia · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 2010.1088/0957-0233/20/6/065601 ↗
34. Janeiro · 2016 · p. 110.1109/I2MTC.2016.7520552 ↗
35. Van Haeverbeke · IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. · 2021 · 70 · 110.1109/TIM.2021.3113116 ↗
36. Zhu · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2019 · 85510.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113627 ↗
37. Xu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab732f ↗
38. Whitley · Technol · 2001 · 43 · 81710.1016/S0950-5849(01)00188-4 ↗
39. Kowski · ChemElectroChem · 2021 · 8 · 295610.1002/celc.202100778 ↗
40. Wan · IEEE Sensors · 2021 · 23 · 434410.1109/.2021.3106160 ↗
41. Holland · 1992 · 267 · 66
42. Ferreira · Complex Systems · 2001 · 13 · 8710.48550/arXiv.cs/0102027 ↗
43. Kruschke · 2014
44. Huang · Electrochim. Acta · 2021 · 36710.1016/j.electacta.2020.137493 ↗
45. Liu · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 33110.1016/j.electacta.2019.135316 ↗
46. Py · Electrochim. Acta · 2023 · 43910.1016/j.electacta.2022.141688 ↗
47. Effat · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 247 · 111710.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.050 ↗
48. Ciucci · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 167 · 43910.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.123 ↗
49. Liu · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 35710.1016/j.electacta.2020.136864 ↗
50. Huang · ECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020 · MA2020-02 · 250810.1149/MA2020-02402508mtgabs ↗
51. Boukamp · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1995 · 142 · 188510.1149/1.2044210 ↗
52. Watanabe · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2010 · 11 · 12
53. Schönleber · Electrochim. Acta · 2014 · 131 · 2010.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.034 ↗
54. Laschuk · RSC Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 2792510.1039/D1RA03785D ↗
55. J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2014 · 15 · 1593
56. Cheng · in Algorithmic Learning Theory · 2018 · 83 · 186
57. Betancourt · 2017
58. Jewson · Entropy · 2018 · 20 · 44210.3390/e20060442 ↗
59. Vehtari · Bayesian Anal · 2021 · 16 · 66710.1214/20-BA1221 ↗
60. Vehtari · Stat. Comput. · 2017 · 27 · 141310.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 ↗
61. Suen · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2017 · 46 · 33710.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
62. Fabbri · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 4 · 380010.1039/C4CY00669K ↗
63. Ye · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 3088710.1021/acsami.9b09144 ↗
64. Swierk · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 1902210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05861 ↗
65. Doyle · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 522410.1039/c3cp43464h ↗
66. McCrory · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1697710.1021/ja407115p ↗
67. Scully · Corrosion · 2000 · 56 · 210.5006/1.3280536 ↗
68. Lutton · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2023 · 17010.1149/1945-7111/acb9c3 ↗
69. Gerard · Corrosion · 2020 · 76 · 48510.5006/3513 ↗
70. Qiu · Npj Mater Degrad · 2017 · 1 · 1510.1038/s41529-017-0009-y ↗
71. Birbilis · Npj Mater Degrad · 2021 · 5 · 1410.1038/s41529-021-00163-8 ↗
72. Scully · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 188 · 9610.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.065 ↗
73. Mansfeld · ASTM Special Technical Publication · 1993 · 1188 · 37
74. Li · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2020 · 142 · 956710.1021/jacs.0c02973 ↗
75. Wu · Adv. Sci. · 2017 · 410.1002/advs.201700194 ↗
76. Sacco · Journal of CO2 Utilization · 2018 · 27 · 2210.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.020 ↗