journal article·2024-06-03Open access

Editors’ Choice—Visualizing the Impact of the Composite Cathode Microstructure and Porosity on Solid-State Battery Performance

Philip Minnmann, Johannes Schubert, Sascha Kremer, René Rekers, Simon Burkhardt, Raffael Ruess, Anja Bielefeld, Felix H. Richter, Jürgen Janek

Abstract

The kinetics of composite cathodes for solid-state batteries (SSBs) relies heavily on their microstructure. Spatial distribution of the different phases, porosity, interface areas, and tortuosity factors are important descriptors that need accurate quantification for models to predict the electrochemistry and mechanics of SSBs. In this study, high-resolution focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy tomography was used to investigate the microstructure of cathodes composed of a nickel-rich cathode active material (NCM) and a thiophosphate-based inorganic solid electrolyte (ISE). The influence of the ISE particle size on the microstructure of the cathode was visualized by 3D reconstruction and charge transport simulation. By comparison of experimentally determined and simulated conductivities of composite cathodes with different ISE particle sizes, the electrode charge transport kinetics is evaluated. Porosity is shown to have a major influence on the cell kinetics and the evaluation of the active mass of electrochemically active particles reveals a higher fraction of connected NCM particles in electrode composites utilizing smaller ISE particles. The results highlight the importance of homogeneous and optimized microstructures for high performance SSBs, securing fast ion and electron transport.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. A solid future for battery development10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries: a review of materials aspects10.1002/aenm.202101126 ↗
3. Challenges in speeding up solid-state battery development10.1038/s41560-023-01208-9 ↗
4. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries10.1038/s41563-019-0431-318 ↗
5. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors10.1038/nenergy.2016.30 ↗
6. A lithium superionic conductor10.1038/nmat3066 ↗
7. Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
8. High-energy long-cycling all-solid-state lithium metal batteries enabled by silver–carbon composite anodes10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
9. Stack pressure considerations for room–temperature all–solid–state lithium metal batteries10.1002/aenm.201903253 ↗
10. Carbon-free high-loading silicon anodes enabled by sulfide solid electrolytes10.1126/science.abg7217 ↗
11. Recent progress and perspectives on designing high-performance thick electrodes for all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1016/j.etran.2021.100152 ↗
12. Transport and mechanical aspects of all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100679 ↗
13. Designing cathodes and cathode active materials for solid-state batteries10.1002/aenm.202201425 ↗
14. Microstructural modeling of composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11043 ↗
15. Modeling effective ionic conductivity and binder influence in composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acsami.9b22788 ↗
16. Electrode morphology in all-solid-state lithium secondary batteries consisting of LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 and Li2S-P2S5 solid electrolytes10.1016/j.ssi.2015.09.010 ↗
17. Favorable composite electrodes for all-solid-state batteries10.2109/jcersj2.18114 ↗
18. Editors’ choice—quantifying the impact of charge transport bottlenecks in composite cathodes of all-solid-state batteries10.1149/1945-7111/abf8d7 ↗
19. Resolving the discrepancy in tortuosity factor estimation for li-ion battery electrodes through micro-macro modeling and experiment10.1149/2.0731814jes ↗
20. The electrode tortuosity factor: why the conventional tortuosity factor is not well suited for quantifying transport in porous li-ion battery electrodes and what to use instead10.1038/s41524-020-00386-4 ↗
21. Tortuosity of battery electrodes: validation of impedance-derived values and critical comparison with 3D tomography10.1149/2.0231803jes ↗
22. Tortuosity determination of battery electrodes and separators by impedance spectroscopy10.1149/2.1141607jes ↗
23. Fabrication of composite positive electrode sheet with high active material content and effect of fabrication pressure for all-solid-state battery10.2109/jcersj2.16321 ↗
24. Kinetics or transport: whither goes the solid-state battery cathode?10.1021/acsami.2c04962 ↗
25. Electronic and ionic conductivities of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co 1/3O2 -Li3PS4 positive composite electrodes for all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1149/2.1501714jes ↗
26. On the additive microstructure in composite cathodes and alumina-coated carbon microwires for improved all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04454 ↗
27. Ion transport limitations in all-solid-state lithium battery electrodes containing a sulfide-based electrolyte10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.095 ↗
28. AC impedance analysis of ionic and electronic conductivities in electrode mixture layers for an all-solid-state lithium-ion battery10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.059 ↗
29. Balancing partial ionic and electronic transport for optimized cathode utilization of high-voltage LiMn2O4 /Li3InCl6 solid-state batteries10.1002/batt.202200544 ↗
30. Design of densified nickel-rich layered composite cathode via the dry-film process for sulfide-based solid-state batteries10.1039/D2TA05021H ↗
31. Effect of mold pressure on compaction and ion conductivity of all-solid-state batteries revealed by the discrete element method10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230344 ↗
32. Effects of volume variations under different compressive pressures on the performance and microstructure of all-solid-state batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228595 ↗
33. Understanding implications of cathode architecture on energy density of solid-state batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2021.05.001 ↗
34. High active material loading in all–solid–state battery electrode via particle size optimization10.1002/aenm.201902881 ↗
35. Digital twin–driven all–solid–state battery: unraveling the physical and electrochemical behaviors10.1002/aenm.202001563 ↗
36. Impact of cathode material particle size on the capacity of bulk-type all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00275 ↗
37. Electrochemical properties of composite cathode using bimodal sized electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries10.1149/2.0481903jes ↗
38. Microstructure control of LiCoO2-Li10GeP2S12 composite cathodes by adjusting the particle size distribution for the enhancement of all-solid-state batteries10.1002/batt.002612023 ↗
39. Mitigating the ion transport tortuosity in composite cathodes of all-solid-state batteries by wet milling of the solid electrolyte particles10.1021/acsaem.3c01242 ↗
40. Effect of mixing method on the properties of composite cathodes for all-solid-state lithium batteries using Li2S–P2S5 solid electrolytes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.049 ↗
41. Importance of mixing protocol for enhanced performance of composite cathodes in all-solid-state batteries using sulfide solid electrolyte10.1007/s10832-018-0129-y ↗
42. Dry coating of active material particles with sulfide solid electrolytes for an all-solid-state lithium battery10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227579 ↗
43. Modeling the influence of mixing strategies on microstructural properties of all-solid-state electrodes10.1002/ente.201801049 ↗
44. Ionic conductivity versus particle size of ball-milled sulfide-based solid electrolytes: strategy towards optimized composite cathode performance in all-solid-state batteries10.1002/batt.000412022e000412022 ↗
45. Analysis of interfacial effects in all-solid-state batteries with thiophosphate solid electrolytes10.1021/acsami.9b21404 ↗
46. Three-dimensional structural measurement and material identification of an all-solid-state lithium-ion battery by X-ray nanotomography and deep learning10.1016/j.powera.2021.100048 ↗
47. Sheet-type all-solid-state batteries with sulfidic electrolytes: analysis of kinetic limitations based on a cathode morphology study10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230064 ↗
48. Numerical simulations of all-solid-state batteries using specific contact area diameters for active materials determined by X-ray computed tomography10.1016/j.powera.2023.100120 ↗
49. Coupled nonlinear stress and electric field numerical simulation for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.powera.2021.100049 ↗
50. Effect of Young’s modulus of active materials on ion transport through solid electrolyte in all-solid-state lithium-ion battery10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229212 ↗
51. Characterization of mechanical degradation in an all-solid-state battery cathode10.1039/D0TA06985J ↗
52. Solid-state lithium battery cathodes operating at low pressures10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.008 ↗
53. The influence of void space on ion transport in a composite cathode for all-solid-state batteries10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.041 ↗
54. Interfacial processes and influence of composite cathode microstructure controlling the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1021/acsami.7b01137 ↗
55. The indium-lithium electrode in solid–state lithium–ion batteries: phase formation, redox potentials, and interface stability10.1002/batt.201800149 ↗
56. Bhattiprolu
57. Charles · 2015
58. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python
59. Quantitative characterization of LiFePO4 cathodes reconstructed by FIB/SEM tomography10.1149/2.033207jes ↗
60. PoreSpy: a python toolkit for quantitative analysis of porous media images10.21105/joss.01296 ↗
61. Application of chords for quantitative characterization of multi-constituent microstructures10.1007/s13632-012-0006-z ↗
62. Pytrax: a simple and efficient random walk implementation for calculating the directional tortuosity of images10.1016/j.softx.2019.100277 ↗
63. Math2Market GmbH · 2023 · 2023
64. Linking solid electrolyte degradation to charge carrier transport in the thiophosphate–based composite cathode toward solid–state lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adfm.202010620 ↗
65. Efficient cell design and fabrication of concentration–gradient composite electrodes for high–power and high–energy–density all–solid–state batteries10.4218/etrij.2019-0176 ↗
66. Mathematical solutions of comprehensive variations of a transmission-line model of the theoretical impedance of porous electrodes10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.065 ↗
67. Nanoscale pore measurements in an all-solid-state lithium-ion battery with ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering (USAXS)10.1016/j.powera.2021.100076 ↗
68. Influence of lithium ion kinetics, particle morphology and voids on the electrochemical performance of composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries10.1149/1945-7111/ac50df ↗
69. Mechanical and physical properties of LiNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 (NMC)10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.048 ↗
70. Sulfide solid electrolyte with favorable mechanical property for all-solid-state lithium battery10.1038/srep02261 ↗
71. Mechanical properties of Li 2 S–P 2 S 5 glasses with lithium halides and application in all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acsaem.7b00140 ↗
72. Impact of the solid electrolyte particle size distribution in sulfide-based solid-state battery composites10.1002/aenm.023092023 ↗
73. Digital-twin-driven structural and electrochemical analysis of Li+ single-ion conducting polymer electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries10.1002/bte2.20220061 ↗
74. Unraveling the limitations of solid oxide electrolytes for all-solid-state electrodes through 3D digital twin structural analysis10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105456 ↗
75. Toward achieving high areal capacity in silicon-based solid-state battery anodes: what influences the rate-performance?10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00722 ↗
76. The electrode tortuosity factor: why the conventional tortuosity factor is not well suited for quantifying transport in porous li-ion battery electrodes and what to use instead10.1038/s41524-020-00386-4 ↗
77. Optimizing the composite cathode microstructure in all-solid-state batteries by structure-resolved simulations10.1002/batt.001672023 ↗
78. Capacity fade in solid-state batteries: interphase formation and chemomechanical processes in nickel-rich layered oxide cathodes and lithium thiophosphate solid electrolytes10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 ↗
79. Chemo-mechanical expansion of lithium electrode materials—on the route to mechanically optimized all-solid-state batteries10.1039/C8EE00907D ↗
80. Editors’ choice—quantification of the impact of chemo-mechanical degradation on the performance and cycling stability of NCM-based cathodes in solid-state li-ion batteries10.1149/1945-7111/ac13d2 ↗
81. Visualization of the interfacial decomposition of composite cathodes in argyrodite-based all-solid-state batteries using time-of-flight secondary-ion mass spectrometry10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00770 ↗
82. Impact of solvent treatment of the superionic argyrodite Li6PS5Cl on solid-state battery performance10.1002/aesr.202000077 ↗
83. Chemical stability and ionic conductivity of LGPS-type solid electrolyte tetra-Li7SiPS8 after solvent treatment10.1021/acsaem.1c01917 ↗
84. The detrimental effects of carbon additives in solid-state batteries using Li10GeP2S12 as solid electrolyte10.1021/acsami.7b11530 ↗