journal article·2022-05-01

Techno-Economic Analysis of FDCA Production through Electrocatalytic Processes

Maria Chiara Massaro, Alessandro Hugo Antonio Monteverde

Publisher page

Abstract

The conversion of biomass into high-value chemicals and its coupling with electrochemical industry represent a viable sustainable alternative to the use of traditional petrochemical processes. The aim of this paper is to investigate the electrochemical production process of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) starting from lignocellulosic biomass, which provides 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as reaction intermediate. The process investigated is based on the scale-up of a model proposed in literature, characterized by the continuous oxidation of HMF into FDCA, catalysed by Ni/NiOOH foam, and its recovery by two-step pH-shift crystallization and subsequent filtration. The imposed productivity is 10000 tons y −1 with an overall process yield of about 70% and a separation efficiency of 95%. From the techno-economic analysis, the estimated minimum selling price (MSP) of FDCA is about 3.67 € kg −1 which is compared with the market price of terephthalic acid, showing no current feasibility of the process on industrial scale. Several factors contribute to the increase in the FDCA price: the high cost of production of HMF, the use of large quantities of acidic and basic substances, the low process yield. Sensitivity analysis shows the impact of HMF, hydrogen and electricity costs on FDCA price.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysis for Biomass Conversion · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Sheldon · Green Chem. · 2014 · 16 · 95010.1039/C3GC41935E ↗
2. Hul · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 1118410.1039/c2ra21811a ↗
3. Gallezot · Catal. Today · 2007 · 121 · 7610.1016/j.cattod.2006.11.019 ↗
4. Zhou · Catal. Today · 2004 · 93–95 · 52310.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.121 ↗
5. Jiang · ACS Energy Lett. · 2016 · 1 · 38610.1021/acsenergylett.6b00214 ↗
6. De Bhowmick · Bioresour. Technol. · 2018 · 247 · 114410.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.163 ↗
7. Dedes · Catalysts 2020 · 2020 · 10 · 743
8. Hou · Green Chem. · 2021 · 23 · 11910.1039/D0GC02770G ↗
9. Gao · ChemSusChem · 2018 · 11 · 254710.1002/cssc.201800695 ↗
10. Liu · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 553310.1021/acscatal.8b01017 ↗
11. Zhang · ACS Catal. · 2015 · 5 · 652910.1021/acscatal.5b01491 ↗
12. Burgess · Macromolecules · 2014 · 47 · 138310.1021/ma5000199 ↗
13. Xu · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2020 · 49 · 427310.1039/D0CS00041H ↗
14. Pandey · Eur. Polym. J. · 2021 · 16010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110778 ↗
15. Zuiderveen · Cleaner Enviromental Systems · 2021 · 210.1016/j.cesys.2021.100036 ↗
16. Sajid · Green Chem. · 2018 · 20 · 542710.1039/C8GC02680G ↗
17. Chen · J. Energy Chem. · 2021 · 54 · 52810.1016/j.jechem.2020.05.068 ↗
18. Orella · Energy Technology · 2020 · 810.1002/ente.201900994 ↗
19. Weidner · J. Org. Chem. · 2018 · 14121 · 1436
20. Giannakoudakis · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2021 · 9 · 197010.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07480 ↗
21. Schiffer · Joule · 2017 · 1 · 1010.1016/j.joule.2017.07.008 ↗
22. Barton · Science · 2020 · 368 · 6496
23. Chadderdon · Green Chem. · 2014 · 16 · 377810.1039/C4GC00401A ↗
24. Park · ACS Nano · 2020 · 14 · 681210.1021/acsnano.0c00581 ↗
25. Barwe · Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 1146010.1002/anie.201806298 ↗
26. You · Angew. Chem. · 2016 · 128 · 1006710.1002/ange.201603798 ↗
27. Jong Kang · Appl. Catal. B Environ. · 2019 · 242 · 8510.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.087 ↗
28. Taitt · ACS Catal. · 2019 · 9 · 66010.1021/acscatal.8b04003 ↗
29. Wang · ChemSusChem · 2021 · 14 · 519910.1002/cssc.202002762 ↗
30. Latsuzbaia · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 2018 · 48 · 61110.1007/s10800-018-1157-7 ↗
31. Vuyyuru · Catal. Today · 2012 · 195 · 14410.1016/j.cattod.2012.05.008 ↗
32. Triebl · Comput. Chem. Eng. · 2013 · 52 · 2610.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.12.005 ↗
33. Bello · Sep. Purif. Technol. · 2020 · 233 · 11605610.1016/j.seppur.2019.116056 ↗
34. van Spronsen · 2018
35. Crockatt · 2020
36. Scale-Up of Electrochemical Reactors10.5772/48728 ↗
37. Noël · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2019 · 52 · 285810.1021/acs.accounts.9b00412 ↗
38. Sinnott · 2005 · 6
39. Schönfeld · Int. J. Pharm. · 2021 · 596 · 12023310.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120233 ↗
40. Kazi · Chem. Eng. J. · 2011 · 169 · 32910.1016/j.cej.2011.03.018 ↗
41. Kim · Green Chem. · 2020 · 22 · 707010.1039/D0GC02258F ↗
42. Europa.eu · 2021
43. Guthrie · Chem. Eng. · 1969 · 76 · 114
44. Diab · Org. Process Res. Dev. · 2017 · 21 · 157110.1021/acs.oprd.7b00225 ↗
45. Coumans · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2022 · 10 · 311610.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06723 ↗
46. Delparish · Chem. Eng. J. · 2022 · 43810.1016/j.cej.2022.135393 ↗