Nonlinear Identifiability Analysis of the Porous Electrode Theory Model of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous electrode theory (PET) is widely used to model battery cycling behavior by describing electrochemical kinetics and transport in solid particles and electrolyte, and modeling thermodynamics by fitting an open-circuit potential. The PET model consists of tightly coupled nonlinear partial differential-algebraic equations in which effective kinetic and transport parameters are fit to battery cycling data, and then the model is used to analyze the effects of variations in design parameters or operating conditions such as charging protocols. In a detailed nonlinear identifiability analysis, we show that most of the effective model parameters in porous electrode theory are not practically identifiable from cycling data for a lithium-ion battery. The only identifiable parameter that can be identified from C/10 discharge data is the effective solid diffusion coefficient, indicating that this battery is in the diffusion-limited regime at this discharge rate. A resistance in series correlation was shown for the practically unidentifiable parameters by mapping out the confidence region. Alternative experiments in addition to discharge cycles are required in order to uniquely determine the full set of parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Doyle · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1993 · 140 · 152610.1149/1.2221597 ↗
2. Jin · International Journal of Energy Research · 2018 · 42 · 241710.1002/er.4022 ↗
3. Jokar · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A287610.1149/2.0191614jes ↗
4. López · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2016 · 55 · 302610.1021/acs.iecr.5b03910 ↗
5. Forman · Journal of Power Sources · 2012 · 210 · 26310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.009 ↗
6. Aitio · 2020
7. Kemper · Journal of Power Sources · 2015 · 286 · 51010.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.134 ↗
8. Ramadesigan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A104810.1149/1.3609926 ↗
9. Newman · AIChE J. · 1975 · 21 · 2510.1002/aic.690210103 ↗
10. Fuller · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1994 · 141 · 110.1149/1.2054684 ↗
11. Fuller · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1994 · 141 · 98210.1149/1.2054868 ↗
12. Fang · International Journal of Energy Research · 2010 · 34 · 10710.1002/er.1652 ↗
13. Baek · International Journal of Automotive Technology · 2015 · 16 · 30910.1007/s12239-015-0033-2 ↗
14. Design and Simulation of Lithium Rechargeable Batteries10.2172/203473 ↗
15. Gu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2000 · 147 · 291010.1149/1.1393625 ↗
16. Torchio · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A119210.1149/2.0291607jes ↗
17. Beck · 1977
18. Gunawan · AIChE J. · 2003 · 49 · 211410.1002/aic.690490819 ↗
19. Braatz · Journal of Process Control · 2006 · 16 · 19310.1016/j.jprocont.2005.06.001 ↗
20. Kao · Epidemics · 2018 · 25 · 8910.1016/j.epidem.2018.05.010 ↗
21. Dawson-Elli · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A110.1149/2.1391714jes ↗
22. A review of simulation optimization techniques
23. Saltelli · Chem. Rev. · 2005 · 105 · 281110.1021/cr040659d ↗
24. Leis · Computers & Chemical Engineering · 1985 · 9 · 9310.1016/0098-1354(85)87008-3 ↗
25. Gunawan · International Journal of Modern Physics B · 2002 · 16 · 36710.1142/S0217979202009883 ↗
26. Rusli · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · D58410.1149/1.2772425 ↗
27. Meeker · The American Statistician · 1995 · 49 · 4810.1080/00031305.1995.10476112 ↗
28. Raue · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 25 · 192310.1093/bioinformatics/btp358 ↗
29. Metropolis · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1949 · 44 · 33510.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
30. Brooks · 2011
31. Binder · Comput. Phys. · 1993 · 7 · 15610.1063/1.4823159 ↗
32. Haario · Statistics and Computing · 2006 · 16 · 33910.1007/s11222-006-9438-0 ↗
33. Chib · The American Statistician · 1995 · 49 · 32710.1080/00031305.1995.10476177 ↗
34. Smith · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · E329110.1149/2.0171711jes ↗
35. Hadigol · Journal of Power Sources · 2015 · 300 · 50710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.060 ↗
36. Xia · Journal of Power Sources · 2006 · 159 · 142210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.012 ↗
37. Persson · Physical Review B · 2010 · 8210.1103/PhysRevB.82.125416 ↗
38. Valøen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2005 · 152 · A88210.1149/1.1872737 ↗
39. Hess · Journal of Power Sources · 2015 · 299 · 15610.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.080 ↗
40. Chang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2000 · 147 · 203310.1149/1.1393481 ↗
41. Model identification and parameter estimation for LiFePO4 batteries10.1049/cp.2013.1889 ↗
42. Li-ion battery model performance for automotive drive cycles with current pulse and EIS parameterization
43. Goldberg · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · 1974 · 78 · 29010.1021/j100596a021 ↗