journal article·2020-12-01Open access

The Dissolution Dilemma for Low Pt Loading Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Catalysts

Daniel J. S. Sandbeck, Niklas Mørch Secher, Masanori Inaba, Jonathan Quinson, Jakob Ejler Sørensen, Jakob Kibsgaard, Alessandro Zana, Francesco Bizzotto, Florian D. Speck, Michael T. Y. Paul, Alexandra Dworzak, Carsten Dosche, Mehtap Oezaslan, Ib Chorkendorff, Matthias Arenz, Serhiy Cherevko

Abstract

Cost and lifetime currently hinder widespread commercialization of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Reduced electrode Pt loadings lower costs; however, the impact of metal loading (on the support) and its relation to degradation (lifetime) remain unclear. The limited research on these parameters stems from synthetic difficulties and lack of in situ analytics. This study addresses these challenges by synthesizing 2D and 3D Pt/C model catalyst systems via two precise routes and systematically varying the loading. Pt dissolution was monitored using on-line inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (on-line-ICP-MS), while X-ray spectroscopy techniques were applied to establish the oxidation states of Pt in correlation with metal loading. Dissolution trends emerge which can be explained by three particle proximity dependent mechanisms: (1) shifts in the Nernst dissolution potential, (2) redeposition, and (3) alteration of Pt oxidation states. These results identify engineering limitations, which should be considered by researchers in fuel cell development and related fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Kongkanand · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 112710.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
2. Gazdzicki · Fuel Cells · 2018 · 18 · 27010.1002/fuce.201700099 ↗
3. Stamenkovic · Science · 2007 · 315 · 49310.1126/science.1135941 ↗
4. Hernandez-Fernandez · Nat. Chem. · 2014 · 6 · 73210.1038/nchem.2001 ↗
5. Escudero-Escribano · Science · 2016 · 352 · 7310.1126/science.aad8892 ↗
6. Li · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 406110.1039/C4EE01564A ↗
7. Oezaslan · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 327310.1021/jz4014135 ↗
8. Safo · ChemPhysChem · 2019 · 20 · 1510.1002/cphc.201900653 ↗
9. Chen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · A8210.1149/1.3258275 ↗
10. Carlton · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 16110.1021/jz2016022 ↗
11. Cherevko · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2018 · 8 · 11810.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.034 ↗
12. Cherevko · Nano Energy · 2016 · 29 · 27510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.005 ↗
13. Keeley · ChemElectroChem · 2016 · 3 · 5110.1002/celc.201500425 ↗
14. Speder · Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 631 · 27810.1016/j.susc.2014.05.024 ↗
15. Speder · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 1497110.1039/c4ra00261j ↗
16. Fabbri · ChemCatChem · 2014 · 6 · 141010.1002/cctc.201490028 ↗
17. Nesselberger · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 91910.1038/nmat3712 ↗
18. Systematic study of Pt/C catalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
19. Taylor · Electrocatalysis · 2016 · 7 · 28710.1007/s12678-016-0304-3 ↗
20. Quinson · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 662710.1021/acscatal.8b00694 ↗
21. Speder · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 360210.1039/c3cp50195g ↗
22. Proch · Electrocatalysis · 2016 · 7 · 24910.1007/s12678-016-0302-5 ↗
23. Speder · Electrochem. Commun. · 2013 · 34 · 15310.1016/j.elecom.2013.06.001 ↗
24. Speder · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 261 · 1410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.039 ↗
25. Goodman · Nat. Catal. · 2019 · 2 · 74810.1038/s41929-019-0328-1 ↗
26. Harzer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F77010.1149/2.0311810jes ↗
27. Garsany · Anal. Chem. · 2010 · 82 · 632110.1021/ac100306c ↗
28. Garsany · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2011 · 662 · 39610.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.016 ↗
29. Garsany · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · F62810.1149/2.036405jes ↗
30. Shinozaki · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · F138410.1149/2.0551512jes ↗
31. Inaba · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 353 · 1910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.140 ↗
32. Inaba · J. Vis. Exp. · 2018 · 133 · 1010.3791/57105 ↗
33. Ke · Electrochim. Acta · 2012 · 72 · 12010.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.004 ↗
34. Sharma · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 3812510.1021/acsami.8b14622 ↗
35. Pizzutilo · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · F151010.1149/2.0731614jes ↗
36. Meier · Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 5 · 4410.3762/bjnano.5.5 ↗
37. Plieth · J. Phys. Chem. · 1982 · 86 · 316610.1021/j100213a020 ↗
38. Mayrhofer · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1443310.1021/jp051735z ↗
39. Yu · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 554010.1021/cm501867c ↗
40. Tang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 59610.1021/ja9071496 ↗
41. Tang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1172210.1021/ja104421t ↗
42. Huang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2017 · 121 · 480610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10842 ↗
43. Murray · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 30 · 54510.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.545 ↗
44. Liu · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 15543010.1103/PhysRevB.72.155430 ↗
45. Liao · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 99910.1039/C4CS00225C ↗
46. Talapin · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 38910.1021/cr900137k ↗
47. Ustarroz · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 677510.1021/acscatal.8b00553 ↗
48. Sandbeck · ACS Catal. · 2020 · 10 · 628110.1021/acscatal.0c00779 ↗
49. Sandbeck · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 2571810.1021/acsami.0c02801 ↗
50. Yu · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 247 · 116910.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.145 ↗
51. Lopes · Nat. Mater. · 2020 · 19 · 120710.1038/s41563-020-0735-3 ↗
52. Cherevko · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · I122810.1149/2.0981603jes ↗
53. Zhang · Science · 2007 · 315 · 22010.1126/science.1134569 ↗
54. Borup · 2018
55. Spanos · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 2804410.1039/C4CP04264F ↗
56. Beermann · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 247610.1039/C9EE01185D ↗
57. Jia · Nano Lett. · 2018 · 18 · 79810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04007 ↗
58. Jovanovič · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 327 · 67510.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.112 ↗
59. Gatalo · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 313110.1021/acsaem.8b02142 ↗
60. Ahluwalia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F302410.1149/2.0031806jes ↗
61. Baldizzone · ACS Catal. · 2015 · 5 · 500010.1021/acscatal.5b01151 ↗
62. Jovanovic · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 2144610.1039/C7CP03192K ↗
63. Debe · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 1 · 5110.1149/1.2214544 ↗
64. Steinbach · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 1 · 83510.1149/1.2356202 ↗
65. Debe · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 161 · 100210.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.033 ↗
66. Bonakdarpour · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 53 · 68810.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.038 ↗
67. Sinha · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · B83110.1149/1.3590748 ↗
68. Kongkanand · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · F40510.1149/2.045208jes ↗
69. Kongkanand · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · F74410.1149/2.074406jes ↗
70. Steinbach · ECS Trans. · 2017 · 80 · 65910.1149/08008.0659ecst ↗