Critical Evaluation of Potentiostatic Holds as Accelerated Predictors of Capacity Fade during Calendar Aging
Source abstract
Abstract
Li-ion batteries will lose both capacity and power over time due to calendar aging caused by slow parasitic processes that consume Li+ ions. Studying and mitigating these processes is traditionally an equally slow venture, which is especially taxing for the validation of new active materials and electrolyte additives. Here, we evaluate whether potentiostatic holds can be used to accelerate the diagnosis of Li+ loss during calendar aging. The technique is based on the idea that, under the right conditions, the current measured as the cell voltage is held constant can be correlated with the instantaneous rate of side reactions. Thus, in principle, these measurements could capture the rate of capacity fade in real time. In practice, we show that this method is incapable of quantitatively forecasting calendar aging trends. Instead, our study demonstrates that potentiostatic holds can be applied for initial qualitative screening of systems that exhibit promising long-term stability, which can be useful to shrink the parameter space for calendar aging studies. By facilitating the identification of improved formulations, this approach can help accelerate innovation in the battery industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Winter · Chem. Rev. · 2018 · 118 · 1143310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 ↗
2. He · Appl. Energy · 2020 · 27310.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115151 ↗
3. Liu · Energy Policy · 2021 · 15810.1016/j.enpol.2021.112564 ↗
4. Xu · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 430310.1021/cr030203g ↗
5. Naumann · J. Energy Storage · 2018 · 17 · 15310.1016/j.est.2018.01.019 ↗
6. Dubarry · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2018 · 9 · 10610.1016/j.coelec.2018.05.023 ↗
7. Thomas · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 206 · 37810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.106 ↗
8. Harlow · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A303110.1149/2.0981913jes ↗
9. 2020
10. Gewald · 201910.1109/EVER.2019.8813534 ↗
11. Seitzinger · Chem. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 319910.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00308 ↗
12. Pekarek · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 789710.1039/C9TA13535A ↗
13. Han · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 2801710.1021/acsami.1c01151 ↗
14. McBrayer · Nat. Energy 2021 · 2021 · 69 · 86610.1038/s41560-021-00883-w ↗
15. Tornheim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A171710.1149/2.1051608jes ↗
16. Tornheim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A44010.1149/2.0951902jes ↗
17. Kalaga · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 280 · 22110.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.101 ↗
18. Vadivel · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A50810.1149/2.1341702jes ↗
19. Lewerenz · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 353 · 14410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.136 ↗
20. Theiler · Batteries · 2021 · 7 · 2210.3390/batteries7020022 ↗
21. Zülke · Batter. Supercaps · 2021 · 4 · 93410.1002/batt.202100046 ↗
22. Zhang · J. Energy Chem. · 2020 · 41 · 13510.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.013 ↗
23. Zhang · Chem. Rev. · 2022 · 122 · 564110.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00327 ↗
24. Gao · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 151210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04551 ↗
25. Keil · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A187210.1149/2.0411609jes ↗
26. Schulze · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 4 · 162810.1021/acsaem.0c02817 ↗
27. Rodrigues · J. Phys.: Energy · 2020 · 210.1088/2515-7655/ab6b3a ↗
28. Wetjen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A150310.1149/2.1261807jes ↗
29. Dose · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A238910.1149/2.1271810jes ↗
30. Single · ChemSusChem · 2018 · 11 · 195010.1002/cssc.201800077 ↗
31. Tornheim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab9ee8 ↗
32. Jung · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A136110.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
33. Tornheim · Nano Energy · 2019 · 55 · 21610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.065 ↗
34. Tornheim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A636610.1149/2.0471701jes ↗
35. Rodrigues · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A169710.1149/2.0611809jes ↗
36. Schmalstieg · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 257 · 32510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.012 ↗
37. Attia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/ab8ce4 ↗
38. Gasper · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2021 · 16810.1149/1945-7111/abdde1 ↗
39. Yin · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 2659310.1021/acsami.0c03799 ↗
40. Long · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A299910.1149/2.0691614jes ↗
41. Zilberman · J. Power Sources · 2019 · 425 · 21710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.109 ↗
42. Lewerenz · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 345 · 25410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.133 ↗
43. Gyenes · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · A27810.1149/2.0191503jes ↗
44. Burrell · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/abbce1 ↗
45. Delacourt · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · A128310.1149/2.049208jes ↗
46. Spotnitz · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 113 · 7210.1016/S0378-7753(02)00490-1 ↗
47. Leng · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 110.1038/srep12967 ↗
48. Wu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A143810.1149/2.0401707jes ↗
49. Bloom · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 101 · 23810.1016/S0378-7753(01)00783-2 ↗
50. Stetson · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 277010.1021/acsenergylett.9b02082 ↗
51. Grolleau · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 255 · 45010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.098 ↗
52. Ecker · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 215 · 24810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.012 ↗
53. Hahn · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 400 · 40210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.019 ↗
54. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 297 · 110910.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.194 ↗
55. Li · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 190 · 112410.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.161 ↗
56. Safari · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A112310.1149/1.3614529 ↗