journal article·2020-01-02

Electrochemical Performance of Recycled Cathode Active Materials Using Froth Flotation-based Separation Process

Hosop Shin, Ruiting Zhan, Kulwinder S Dhindsa, Lei Pan, Taehee Han

Publisher page

Abstract

With the rapid growth of the volume of spent Li-ion batteries (LIBs), recycling of spent LIBs has attracted significant attention in recent years for future sustainability. In particular, there remains a great need for the development of a scalable and environment-friendly separation process to recycle valuable cathode active materials from spent LIBs and electrode scraps. In this work, froth flotation technique was adopted to separate cathode active materials from a mixture of cathode and anode materials. To evaluate whether the recovered cathode materials maintain their functional integrity after the developed separation process, a variety of electrochemical analyses have been conducted systematically. The present work demonstrated that froth flotation process with kerosene enhanced separability of mixed electrode materials and the recycled cathode materials almost preserved their original electrochemical reactivity. Cycle performance (up to 200 cycles) and rate capability (up to 1 C) of the recycled cathodes were comparable to those of a pristine cathode. However, the higher polarization observed in the recycled cathodes was identified as a key challenge, and it needs to be addressed further. This work provides valuable insights into further development of a scalable froth flotation-based recycling process which can be implemented in a direct recycling process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Richa · Resour. Conserv. Recycl. · 2014 · 83 · 6310.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.008 ↗
2. Ramoni · Clean Technol. Environ. Policy · 2013 · 15 · 88110.1007/s10098-013-0588-4 ↗
3. Dunn · Energy & Environmental Science · 2015 · 8 · 15810.1039/C4EE03029J ↗
4. Dunn · Environmental Science & Technology · 2012 · 46 · 1270410.1021/es302420z ↗
5. Georgi-Maschler · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 207 · 17310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.152 ↗
6. Zhan · Sustain. Mater. Technol. · 2018 · 1710.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00062 ↗
7. Zheng · Engineering · 2018 · 4 · 36110.1016/j.eng.2018.05.018 ↗
8. Lv · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2018 · 6 · 150410.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811 ↗
9. Zeng · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · 2014 · 44 · 112910.1080/10643389.2013.763578 ↗
10. Chagnes · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · 2013 · 88 · 119110.1002/jctb.4053 ↗
11. Xu · J. Power Sources · 2008 · 177 · 51210.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.074 ↗
12. Bae · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · E19910.1149/2.0691607jes ↗
13. Wang · Energy Technology · 2018 · 6 · 242910.1002/ente.201800315 ↗
14. Shi · Green Chem. · 2018 · 20 · 85110.1039/C7GC02831H ↗
15. Song · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 478310.1039/C6RA27210J ↗
16. Zhang · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2016 · 4 · 704110.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01948 ↗
17. Chen · Green Chem. · 2016 · 18 · 250010.1039/C5GC02650D ↗
18. Zhang · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2014 · 9 · 369110.1016/S1452-3981(23)08042-2 ↗
19. Ganter · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 256 · 27410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.078 ↗
20. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 240 · 76610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.009 ↗
21. Diekmann · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 16410.1149/2.0271701jes ↗
22. Stehmann · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A62210.1149/2.0631704jes ↗
23. Zheng · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2018 · 6 · 1397710.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02405 ↗
24. Jung · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A13210.1149/2.0401802jes ↗
25. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 510210.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.009 ↗
26. Shkrob · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 16410.1149/2.0861707jes ↗
27. Kim · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2006 · 9 · A1910.1149/1.2135427 ↗
28. Xiong · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 222 · 31810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.029 ↗
29. Wood · Drying Technol. · 2018 · 36 · 23410.1080/07373937.2017.1319855 ↗
30. Du · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 354 · 20010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.030 ↗
31. Wood · Energy Storage Mater. · 2020 · 24 · 18810.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.020 ↗
32. Forrest · Coal Preparation · 1994 · 14 · 1310.1080/07349349408905219 ↗
33. Bello · Combust. Flame · 2018 · 188 · 24310.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.041 ↗
34. Yoon · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 323710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00454 ↗
35. Landesfeind · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 16510.1149/2.0971805jes ↗
36. Somerville · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 335 · 18910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.002 ↗
37. Li · JOM · 2017 · 69 · 148410.1007/s11837-017-2404-9 ↗
38. Martin · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2008 · 11 · A1210.1149/1.2801016 ↗
39. Gordon · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 223 · 6310.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.013 ↗
40. Landesfeind · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 16410.1149/2.0131709jes ↗
41. Dees · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · A55910.1149/2.0231504jes ↗
42. Pritzl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 16510.1149/2.0461810jes ↗
43. Trask · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 259 · 23310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.077 ↗
44. Eddahech · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 258 · 21810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.020 ↗
45. Ramadass · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A19610.1149/1.1634273 ↗
46. Croce · Energy & Environmental Science · 2011 · 4 · 92110.1039/c0ee00348d ↗
47. Liu · Mater. Today · 2016 · 19 · 10910.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.009 ↗
48. Muthiah · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · 2017 · 5 · 1996310.1039/C7TA06806A ↗
49. Tatara · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 16610.1149/2.0121903jes ↗
50. Matsubara · 2000 · 260
51. Shin · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 16210.1149/2.0071509jes ↗