journal article·2022-01-01Open access

Worrisome Exaggeration of Activity of Electrocatalysts Destined for Steady-State Water Electrolysis by Polarization Curves from Transient Techniques

Sengeni Anantharaj, Subrata Kundu, Suguru Noda

Abstract

Cyclic and linear sweep voltammetry techniques substantially misjudge the performance of water splitting electrocatalysts due to their transient nature that forbids the interface from reaching a steady-state. This misjudgment leads to the potentially detrimental yet unwittingly falsified data accumulation in the literature that requires immediate attention. Alternatively, sampled-current voltammetry (SCV) constructed from steady-state responses is advised to be widely adopted for screening electrocatalysts that are actually destined for steady-state operations. To show that this exaggeration is universal, a well-characterized activated SS, coprecipitated Co(OH) 2 , and Pt foil electrodes are studied for OER and HER in 1.0 M KOH. The results urge that it is time to adopt a relatively more precise alternative technique such as SCV.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Anantharaj · ACS Catal. · 2016 · 6 · 806910.1021/acscatal.6b02479 ↗
2. Anantharaj · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 1010.1002/aenm.201902666 ↗
3. Shi · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2016 · 45 · 152910.1039/C5CS00434A ↗
4. Gao · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 298610.1039/c2cs35310e ↗
5. Wang · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2018 · 47 · 610110.1039/C8CS00314A ↗
6. Anantharaj · Nano Energy · 2021 · 8010.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105514 ↗
7. Anantharaj · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 417410.1039/C9TA14037A ↗
8. Voiry · ACS Nano · 2018 · 12 · 963510.1021/acsnano.8b07700 ↗
9. Anantharaj · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 74410.1039/C7EE03457A ↗
10. Fabbri · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 4 · 380010.1039/C4CY00669K ↗
11. Li · Small · 2019 · 1510.1002/smll.201805103 ↗
12. Grimaud · Nat. Chem. · 2017 · 9 · 45710.1038/nchem.2695 ↗
13. Suen · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2017 · 46 · 33710.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
14. Chen · Chem. Commun. · 2013 · 49 · 889610.1039/c3cc44076a ↗
15. Carmo · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 38 · 490110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
16. Schäfer · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 57410.1021/acsenergylett.8b00024 ↗
17. Liardet · ACS Catal. · 2018 · 8 · 64410.1021/acscatal.7b03198 ↗
18. Zhang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 74510.1021/acsami.7b16280 ↗
19. Han · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 224010.1021/acsami.6b10983 ↗
20. Sun · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 1888710.1039/C6NR07676A ↗
21. Liu · Chem. Commun. · 2015 · 51 · 1668310.1039/C5CC06892D ↗
22. Zeng · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 2431110.1039/C8TA08149B ↗
23. Li · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2017 · 27 · 170251310.1002/adfm.201702513 ↗
24. Cheng · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 2320710.1039/C5TA06788J ↗
25. Cai · Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. · 2017 · 56 · 485810.1002/anie.201701280 ↗
26. Li · Nano Res. · 2017 · 10 · 362910.1007/s12274-017-1572-9 ↗
27. Anantharaj · Angew. Chemie-Int. Ed. · 2021 · 60 · 1898110.1002/anie.202015738 ↗
28. Anantharaj · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 160710.1021/acsenergylett.1c00608 ↗
29. Bard · 2001
30. Anantharaj · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 126010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00686 ↗