journal article·2019Open access

Exploring the Impact of Electrode Microstructure on Redox Flow Battery Performance Using a Multiphysics Pore Network Model

Mohammad Amin Sadeghi, Mehrez Aganou, Matthew Kok, Mahmoudreza Aghighi, Geraldine Merle, Jake Barralet, Jeff Gostick

Abstract

The redox flow battery is a promising energy storage technology for managing the inherent uncertainty of renewable energy sources. At present, however, they are too expensive and thus economically unattractive. Optimizing flow batteries is thus an active area of research, with the aim of reducing cost by maximizing performance. This work addresses microstructural electrode optimizations by providing a modeling framework based on pore-networks to study the multiphysics involved in a flow battery, with a specific focus on pore-scale structure and its impact on transport processes. The proposed pore network approach was extremely cheap in computation cost (compared to direct numerical simulation) and therefore was used for parametric sweeps to search for optimum electrode structures in a reasonable time. It was found that that increasing porosity generally helps performance by increasing the permeability and flow rate at a given pressure drop, despite reducing reactive surface area per unit volume. As a more nuanced structural study, it was found that aligning fibers in the direction of flow helps performance by increasing permeability but showed diminishing returns beyond slight alignment. The proposed model was demonstrated in the context of a hydrogen bromine flow battery but could be applied to any system of interest.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.00210.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.002 ↗
2. Council N. R. , Sciences D on E and P, Systems B on E and E, Future C for TNAS on AE. The National Academies Summit on America's Energy Future: Summary of a Meeting., National Academies Press; 2008.
3. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.08110.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.081 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.esd.2010.09.00710.1016/j.esd.2010.09.007 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.07.00210.1016/j.enbuild.2010.07.002 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
7. 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.enconman.2011.01.01210.1016/j.enconman.2011.01.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.02210.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.022 ↗
10. 10.1038/nature1290910.1038/nature12909 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.1001409jes10.1149/2.1001409jes ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.07310.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.073 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.12910.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.129 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.063 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.10310.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.103 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.12310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.123 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.04210.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.042 ↗
18. 10.1149/2.1281607jes10.1149/2.1281607jes ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.02110.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.021 ↗
20. Binyu X. Jiyun Z. Jinbin L. , Modeling of an all-vanadium redox flow battery and optimization of flow rates., Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet. PES 2013 IEEE, IEEE; p. 1, 2013.
21. 10.1149/2.0941409jes10.1149/2.0941409jes ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.07110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.071 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.04210.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.042 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.04210.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.042 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.042 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.06510.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.065 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.08610.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.086 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.06510.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.065 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.042 ↗
30. 10.1002/celc.20180112810.1002/celc.201801128 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.est.2018.11.01410.1016/j.est.2018.11.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ces.2018.10.04910.1016/j.ces.2018.10.049 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.070 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.014 ↗
35. 10.1002/aic.1595910.1002/aic.15959 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.05810.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.058 ↗
37. 10.2136/vzj2004.011410.2136/vzj2004.0114 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.222112010.1149/1.2221120 ↗
39. 10.1149/1.348310610.1149/1.3483106 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00084-X10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00084-X ↗
41. 10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00049-010.1016/S0309-1708(02)00049-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cageo.2019.01.00910.1016/j.cageo.2019.01.009 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.13910.1016/j.cej.2017.07.139 ↗
44. 10.1002/fuce.20150016810.1002/fuce.201500168 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.01510.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.015 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.020 ↗
47. Sadeghi M. A. Agnaou M. Barralet J. Gostick J. T. , Dispersion modeling in pore networks: a comparison of common pore-scale models and a new approach, Manuscr Submitt Publ n.d .
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.059 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.01710.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.017 ↗
50. 10.1149/2.018211jes10.1149/2.018211jes ↗