Impact of Platinum Loading and Layer Thickness on Cathode Catalyst Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we investigate the effect of platinum loading and layer thickness on cathode catalyst degradation by a comprehensive in situ and STEM-EDS characterization. To decouple the effect of the platinum loading and layer thickness from each other, the experiments were categorized in two sets, each with cathode loadings varying between 0.1 and 0.4 mgPt cm−2: (i) Samples with a constant Pt/C ratio and thus varying layer thickness, and (ii) samples with varying Pt/C ratios, achieved by dilution with bare carbon, to maintain a constant layer thickness at different platinum loadings. Every MEA was subjected to an accelerated stress test, where the cell was operated for 45,000 cycles between 0.6 and 0.95 V. Regardless of the Pt/C ratio, a higher relative loss in electrochemically active surface area was measured for lower Pt loadings. STEM-EDS measurements showed that Pt was mainly lost close to the cathode—membrane interface by the concentration driven Pt2+ ion flux into the membrane. The size of this Pt-depletion zone has shown to be independent on the overall Pt loading and layer thickness, hence causing higher relative Pt loss in low thickness electrodes, as the depletion zone accounts for a larger fraction of the catalyst layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Zamel · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 309 · 14110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.091 ↗
2. Kongkanand · J. Phys. Chem. Letters · 2016 · 7 · 112710.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
3. Soboleva · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2011 · 3 · 182710.1021/am200590w ↗
4. Soboleva · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2010 · 2 · 37510.1021/am900600y ↗
5. Scherzer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2022 · 16910.1149/1945-7111/ac58c2 ↗
6. Alink · Molecules · 2020 · 25 · 152310.3390/molecules25071523 ↗
7. Garsany · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F38110.1149/2.1361805jes ↗
8. Shahgaldi · Appl. Energy · 2018 · 225 · 102210.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.086 ↗
9. Shahgaldi · Appl. Energy · 2018 · 217 · 29510.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.154 ↗
10. Shahgaldi · Energy Convers. Manage. · 2018 · 171 · 147610.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.078 ↗
11. Song · Energies · 2019 · 12 · 54910.3390/en12030549 ↗
12. Herden · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 364 · 44910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.057 ↗
13. Herden · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 355 · 3610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.051 ↗
14. Owejan · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · F82410.1149/2.072308jes ↗
15. de Bruijn · Fuel Cells · 2008 · 8 · 310.1002/fuce.200700053 ↗
16. Shao-Horn · Top. Catal. · 2017 · 46 · 28510.1007/s11244-007-9000-0 ↗
17. Büchi · 2009
18. Harzer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F311810.1149/2.0161806jes ↗
19. Schneider · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F32210.1149/2.0881904jes ↗
20. Kneer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F80510.1149/2.0651810jes ↗
21. Fairweather · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 16010.1149/2.024309jes ↗
22. Darab · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 232 · 50510.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.101 ↗
23. Hegge · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F95610.1149/2.0611913jes ↗
24. Schuler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F302010.1149/2.0031907jes ↗
25. Kneer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F324110.1149/2.0271806jes ↗
26. Mayur · Energies · 2018 · 11 · 250410.3390/en11082054 ↗
27. Morando · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 147210.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.286 ↗
28. More · ECS Trans. · 2006 · 3 · 71710.1149/1.2356192 ↗
29. Schneider · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F32210.1149/2.0881904jes ↗
30. Zhou · Energy · 2017 · 138 · 117510.1016/j.energy.2017.07.096 ↗
31. Meyer · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 47010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228285 ↗
32. Weber · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1720710.1039/C4TA02952F ↗
33. Orfanidi · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F41810.1149/2.1621704jes ↗
34. Guetaz · ECS Trans. · 2015 · 69 · 45510.1149/06917.0455ecst ↗
35. Morawietz · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F313910.1149/2.0151806jes ↗
36. Makharia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2005 · 152 · A97010.1149/1.1888367 ↗
37. Baker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B99110.1149/1.3152226 ↗
38. Beuscher · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2006 · 153 · A178810.1149/1.2218760 ↗
39. Darling · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 15010.1149/1.1613669 ↗
40. Berlinger · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 14 · 3673110.1021/acsami.2c10499 ↗
41. Nonoyama · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · B41610.1149/1.3546038 ↗
42. Muzaffar · Sustainable Energy Fuels · 2018 · 2 · 118910.1039/C8SE00026C ↗
43. Olbrich · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2022
44. Andersen · Appl. Catalysis B · 2016 · 181 · 14610.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.049 ↗
45. Andersen · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2016 · 41 · 189210.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.101 ↗