The Effect of Cell Compression and Cathode Pressure on Hydrogen Crossover in PEM Water Electrolysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen crossover poses a crucial issue for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) water electrolysers in terms of safe operation and efficiency losses, especially at increased hydrogen pressures. Besides the impact of external operating conditions, the structural properties of the materials also influence the mass transport within the cell. In this study, we provide an analysis of the effect of elevated cathode pressures (up to 15 bar) in addition to increased compression of the membrane electrode assembly on hydrogen crossover and the cell performance, using thin Nafion 212 membranes and current densities up to 3.6 A cm−2. It is shown that a higher compression leads to increased mass transport overpotentials, although the overall cell performance is improved due to the decreased ohmic losses. The mass transport limitations also become visible in enhanced anodic hydrogen contents with increasing compression at high current densities. Moreover, increases in cathode pressure are amplifying the compression effect on hydrogen crossover and mass transport losses. The results indicate that the cell voltage should not be the only criterion for optimizing the system design, but that the material design has to be considered for the reduction of hydrogen crossover in PEM water electrolysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Bensmann · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2014 · 39 · 4910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.085 ↗
2. Millet · 2015
3. Grigoriev · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2009 · 34 · 598610.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.047 ↗
4. Schalenbach · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2013 · 38 · 1492110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.013 ↗
5. Schalenbach · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2016 · 41 · 72910.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.009 ↗
6. Ayers · Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. · 2019 · 10 · 21910.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-030241 ↗
7. Babic · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F38710.1149/2.1441704jes ↗
8. Carmo · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2013 · 38 · 490110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
9. Bernt · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/abaa68 ↗
10. Ito · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2016 · 41 · 2043910.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.119 ↗
11. Schalenbach · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 156 · 32110.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.010 ↗
12. Schalenbach · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 2514510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04155 ↗
13. Trinke · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · F316410.1149/2.0221611jes ↗
14. Trinke · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2017 · 42 · 1435510.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.231 ↗
15. Trinke · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F50210.1149/2.0541807jes ↗
16. Trinke · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F46510.1149/2.0171908jes ↗
17. Stähler · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2020 · 45 · 400810.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.016 ↗
18. Omrani · Electrochim. Acta · 2021 · 37710.1016/j.electacta.2021.138085 ↗
19. Frensch · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 263 · 22810.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.040 ↗
20. Borgardt · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2019 · 44 · 2355610.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.075 ↗
21. Espinoza · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2015 · 39 · 152810.1002/er.3348 ↗
22. Chang · J. Power Sources · 2007 · 166 · 14910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.015 ↗
23. Stähler · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. · 2020 · 9810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102473 ↗
24. Stähler · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2019 · 44 · 705310.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.016 ↗
25. Liu · Electrochem. Commun. · 2018 · 97 · 9610.1016/j.elecom.2018.10.021 ↗
26. Liu · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 1110.1002/aenm.202002926 ↗
27. 2021
28. Klose · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F127110.1149/2.1241814jes ↗
29. Ge · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 159 · 92210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.069 ↗
30. Lee · J. Power Sources · 1999 · 84 · 4510.1016/S0378-7753(99)00298-0 ↗
31. Taccani · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2011 · 36 · 1028210.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.10.026 ↗
32. Dhahad · Renewable Energy Focus · 2019 · 30 · 7110.1016/j.ref.2019.05.002 ↗
33. Kusoglu · J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. · 2008 · 46 · 240410.1002/polb.21573 ↗
34. Kim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/abb173 ↗
35. Bernt · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · F317910.1149/2.0231611jes ↗
36. Suermann · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 211 · 98910.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.120 ↗
37. Schuler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F55510.1149/2.1241908jes ↗
38. Suermann · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F97310.1149/2.13517109jes ↗
39. Haar · 1984
40. Schmidt · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 16710.1149/1945-7111/aba5d4 ↗
41. Janssen · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2004 · 29 · 75910.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.08.014 ↗
42. Kikuchi · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2009 · 329 · 30610.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.009 ↗
43. Kikuchi · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2006 · 298 · 91410.1016/j.jcis.2006.01.010 ↗
44. Borgardt · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 374 · 8410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.027 ↗
45. Kusoglu · ECS Electrochem. Lett. · 2014 · 3 · F3310.1149/2.008405eel ↗
46. Kusoglu · J. Membr. Sci. · 2012 · 421-422 · 28310.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.027 ↗
47. Kusoglu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 15810.1149/2.097112jes ↗