journal article·2017Open access

Optimal Design of Li-Ion Batteries through Multi-Physics Modeling and Multi-Objective Optimization

Changhong Liu, Lin Liu

Abstract

Battery design variable optimization can significantly affect battery capacity, discharge specific power, and discharge specific energy. However, many design variables need to be taken into consideration, which requires intensive computation and simulation. Our previously developed comprehensive battery degradation model is utilized in this optimization study via parallel computing. A three-electrode cell is developed for model validation over long term cycling. The objectives of optimization are maximizing discharge specific power and specific energy as well as minimizing capacity loss. Several design variables (e.g., thickness, particle size, and porosity) are optimized through a modified Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II). The obtained Pareto-optimal solutions that show electrode thickness, particle sizes, porosity, and conductivity are the battery design variables that can significantly affect battery performance. In addition, a sensitivity analysis suggests that a thicker electrode and a smaller particle size can improve battery performance. The optimized batteries have a better performance over 750 cycle's simulation: less SOC swing and less reduction of capacity. The design optimization framework developed herein can be modified and applied to various type of batteries with different optimization objectives and battery design variables.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Shahan Z. , 1 Million Pure EVs Worldwide: EV Revolution Begins! 2016 [cited 2016 November 22]; Available from: https://cleantechnica.com/2016/11/22/1-million-ev-revolution-begins/.
2. 10.1149/06920.0005ecst10.1149/06920.0005ecst ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.11210.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.112 ↗
4. Liu C. Liu L. , PMP-based Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle Power Management System Considering Battery Current Constraint and Battery Health Analysis. 2015, SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2015-01-1217 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.10010.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.100 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00190-810.1016/S0378-7753(02)00190-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.044 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.139251210.1149/1.1392512 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.183692110.1149/1.1836921 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.01510.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.015 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.205468410.1149/1.2054684 ↗
13. Thomas K. E. Newman J. Darling R. M. , Mathematical modeling of lithium batteries, in Advances in lithium-ion batteries, 2002, Springer. p. 345.10.1007/0-306-47508-1_13 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.204997410.1149/1.2049974 ↗
15. 10.1023/A:101848103049910.1023/A:1018481030499 ↗
16. 10.1016/0378-7753(94)02038-510.1016/0378-7753(94)02038-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-810.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-8 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.183885710.1149/1.1838857 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.183837610.1149/1.1838376 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.403206610.1115/1.4032066 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.217253510.1149/1.2172535 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.178501310.1149/1.1785013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.03510.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.035 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.025 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.052 ↗
26. Guan P. Liu L. , Lithium-ion Diffusion in Solid Electrolyte Interface (SEI) Predicted by Phase Field Model, in MRS Proceedings. 2015. Cambridge Univ Press.10.1557/opl.2015.107 ↗
27. Guan P. Liu L. , Phase Field Simulation of Lithium Ion Diffusion in Solid Electrolyte Interface, in Meeting Abstracts. 2015. The Electrochemical Society.10.1557/opl.2015.107 ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0521509jes10.1149/2.0521509jes ↗
29. 10.1149/2.036308jes10.1149/2.036308jes ↗
30. 10.1149/1.283055210.1149/1.2830552 ↗
31. Hong Y. Lee C. W. , The Multiobjective Optimal Design Problems and their Pareto Optimal Fronts for Li-Ion Battery Cells, 2016, SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2016-01-1199 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.075 ↗
33. 10.1149/2.026302jes10.1149/2.026302jes ↗
34. 10.1149/1.361452910.1149/1.3614529 ↗
35. 10.1149/1.304342910.1149/1.3043429 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.175997210.1149/1.1759972 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.163427310.1149/1.1634273 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.178763110.1149/1.1787631 ↗
39. 10.1149/1.139163110.1149/1.1391631 ↗
40. 10.1149/2.040310jes10.1149/2.040310jes ↗
41. Deb K. , Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Vol. 16, 2001: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Schlesinger M. Paunovic M. , Modern electroplating, Vol. 55, 2011: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470602638 ↗
43. 10.1147/rd.425.056710.1147/rd.425.0567 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.05010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.050 ↗