Comparative Evaluation of LMR-NCM and NCA Cathode Active Materials in Multilayer Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells: Part I. Production, Electrode Characterization, and Formation
Source abstract
Abstract
A lithium- and manganese-rich layered transition metal oxide (LMR-NCM) cathode active material (CAM) is processed on a pilot production line and assembled with graphite anodes to ≈7 Ah multilayer pouch cells. Each production step is outlined in detail and compared to NCA/graphite reference cells. Using laboratory coin cell data for different CAM loadings and cathode porosities, a simple calculation tool to extrapolate and optimize the energy density of multilayer pouch cells is presented and validated. Scanning electron microscopy and mercury porosimetry measurements of the cathodes elucidate the effect of the CAM morphology on the calendering process and explain the difficulty of achieving commonly used cathode porosities with LMR-NCM cathodes. Since LMR-NCMs exhibit strong gassing during the first cycles, a modified formation procedure based on on-line electrochemical mass spectroscopy is developed that allows stable cycling of LMR-NCM in multilayer pouch cells. After formation and degassing, LMR-NCM/graphite pouch cells have a 30% higher CAM-specific capacity and a ≈5%–10% higher cell-level energy density at a rate of C/10 compared to NCA/graphite cells. Rate capability, long-term cycling, and thermal behavior of the pouch cells in comparison with laboratory coin cells are investigated in Part II of this work.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Andre · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 670910.1039/C5TA00361J ↗
2. Schmuch · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 26710.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 ↗
3. Gallagher · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 155510.1039/c3ee43870h ↗
4. Myung · ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 19610.1021/acsenergylett.6b00594 ↗
5. Xu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 3010.1002/adfm.202004748 ↗
6. Kwade · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 29010.1038/s41560-018-0130-3 ↗
7. Schünemann · 2015
8. Rozier · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · A249010.1149/2.0111514jes ↗
9. Schipper · Inorganics · 2017 · 5 · 3210.3390/inorganics5020032 ↗
10. Teufl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · 271810.1149/2.0691811jes ↗
11. Zhang · Solid State Ionics · 2014 · 268 · 23110.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.052 ↗
12. Dogan · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 232810.1021/ja511299y ↗
13. Kleiner · Chem. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 365610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00163 ↗
14. Saubanère · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2016 · 9 · 98410.1039/C5EE03048J ↗
15. Strehle · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A40010.1149/2.1001702jes ↗
16. Simonin · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1131610.1039/c2jm31205k ↗
17. Oh · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 596510.1021/nl502980k ↗
18. Becker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 6052410.1149/1945-7111/ab8401 ↗
19. Helbig · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 6051910.1149/1945-7111/ab8405 ↗
20. Boulet-Roblin · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2015 · 162 · A129710.1149/2.0491507jes ↗
21. Teufl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 1110.1149/1945-7111/ab9e7f ↗
22. Wagner · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 220410.1021/jz100553m ↗
23. Günter · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A170910.1149/2.0121910jes ↗
24. Chen · Joule · 2019 · 3 · 109410.1016/j.joule.2019.02.004 ↗
25. Petibon · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A114610.1149/2.0191607jes ↗
26. Jung · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A170510.1149/2.0951608jes ↗
27. Solchenbach · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A226510.1149/2.0581610jes ↗
28. Polzin · Meet. Abstr. · 2014 · MA2014-01 · 21310.1149/MA2014-01/2/213 ↗
29. Pettinger · 201310.1007/978-3-642-30653-2_17 ↗
30. Schmidt · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 6050110.1149/1945-7111/ab798a ↗
31. Reinhart · 2013 · 310.1007/978-3-642-24491-9_1 ↗
32. Zheng · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 208 · 5210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.001 ↗
33. Pritzl · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A58210.1149/2.0451904jes ↗
34. Jossen · 2019
35. Gallagher · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A13810.1149/2.0321602jes ↗
36. Wu · 2015
37. Oswald · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 10051110.1149/1945-7111/ab9187 ↗
38. Bockholt · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 325 · 14010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.127 ↗
39. Meyer · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2017 · 249 · 17210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.031 ↗
40. Schreiner · Energy Technol. · 2019 · 1810.1002/ente.201900840 ↗
41. Günther · Energy Technol. · 2019 · 510.1002/ente.201900026 ↗
42. Meyer · Energy Technol. · 2020 · 810.1002/ente.201900175 ↗
43. Haselrieder · 2016
44. Knoche · Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2015 · 794 · 1110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.794.11 ↗
45. Günter · Energy Technol. · 2020 · 810.1002/ente.201801108 ↗
46. Knoche · Procedia CIRP · 2016 · 41 · 40510.1016/j.procir.2015.12.044 ↗
47. Korthauer · 201810.1007/978-3-662-53071-9 ↗
48. Koga · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 236 · 25010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.075 ↗
49. Tsiouvaras · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · A47110.1149/2.042303jes ↗
50. Kraft · Comparative Evaluation of LMR-NCM and NCA Cathode Active Materials in Multilayer Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells - Part II: Rate Capability, Long-Term Stability and Thermal Behavior. · 168 · 02053710.1149/1945-7111/abe5e6 ↗
51. Kaiser · Chem. Ing. Tech. · 2014 · 86 · 69510.1002/cite.201300085 ↗
52. Elucidating the Reactivity of Tris(trimethylsilyl)phosphite and Tris(trimethylsilyl)phosphate Additives in Carbonate Electrolytes—A Comparative Online Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry Study10.1021/acsaem.9b01551 ↗
53. Ye · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 748810.1002/adfm.201503276 ↗
54. Shah · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · A98910.1149/2.052406jes ↗
55. Björklund · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A305410.1149/2.0711713jes ↗
56. Quinn · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A328410.1149/2.0281814jes ↗
57. Besli · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 1259310.1039/C9TA01720H ↗
58. Besli · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 49110.1021/acs.chemmater.8b04418 ↗
59. Nanda · Pramana - J Phys · 2015 · 84 · 107310.1007/s12043-015-1006-8 ↗
60. Froboese · Mater. Charact. · 2017 · 133 · 10210.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.002 ↗
61. Simon · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F169710.1149/2.1321714jes ↗
62. Giesche · 2002 · 33510.1002/9783527618286 ↗
63. Giesche · Part. Part. Syst. Charact. · 2006 · 23 · 910.1002/ppsc.200601009 ↗
64. Bockholt · ECS Trans. · 2013 · 50 · 2510.1149/05026.0025ecst ↗
65. Wandt · Mater. Today · 2018 · 21 · 82510.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.037 ↗
66. Freiberg · J. Phys. Chem. · 2018 · 122 · 882810.1021/acs.jpca.8b08079 ↗
67. Streich · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A96410.1149/2.0801606jes ↗
68. Tuebke · Entwicklungsperspektiven für Zellformate von Lithium-Ionen-Batterien in der Elektromobilität · 2017
69. Jung · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2017 · 8 · 482010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01927 ↗
70. Jung · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A136110.1149/2.0021707jes ↗
71. Teufl · Meet. Abstr. · 2018 · MA2018-02 · 45610.1149/MA2018-02/6/456 ↗
72. Kim · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 225 · 35810.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.126 ↗
73. Teufl · Thermal Stability of FEC-Based Electrolytes for High-Voltage Li-Ion Batteries.
74. Metzger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 163 · A79810.1149/2.1151605jes ↗
75. Poggemann · Chem. Ing. Tech. · 1979 · 51 · 94810.1002/cite.330511007 ↗
76. Kim · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 810.1002/aenm.201702028 ↗
77. Noh · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 233 · 12110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.063 ↗
78. Sicklinger · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A232210.1149/2.0011912jes ↗
79. Jung · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A13210.1149/2.0401802jes ↗
80. Chen · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 134710.1088/1742-6596/1347/1/012012 ↗