PEM Fuel Cell Start-Up/Shut-Down Losses vs Relative Humidity: The Impact of Water in the Electrode Layer on Carbon Corrosion
Source abstract
Abstract
For automotive applications, one of the main challenges for proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is to increase the lifetime of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs), especially during transient operating conditions such as start-up/shut-down (SUSD) cycles. During SUSD, the carbon support in the cathode layer is known to be oxidized as a consequence of hydrogen/air anode gas fronts moving through the anode. In this work, we focus on the effect of relative humidity (RH) during SUSD events. Here we show the significant impact on PEMFC performance by both experiments with 50 cm 2 single-cell PEMFCs and by a simple SUSD model using the RH-dependent kinetics for the carbon oxidation reaction (COR) rate. The kinetic parameters of the COR are determined by on-line mass spectrometry, yielding a COR reaction order with respect to RH of one. Utilizing the thus determined COR kinetics in the SUSD model predicts a ≈ 3-fold lower COR during SUSD events at 80°C for an MEA with a conventional high surface area carbon support when the RH is decreased from 100% to 25%. This agrees perfectly well with the experimentally determined factor of ≈ 3.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Compare Fuel Cell Vehicles, retrieved from https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fcv_sbs.shtml, (accessed 10/11/2018).
2. 10.1149/08613.0003ecst10.1149/08613.0003ecst ↗
3. 10.4271/2015-01-116910.4271/2015-01-1169 ↗
4. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. (11/01/2016), [Updated] October 2016 Sales Chart [Press release], retrieved from http://corporatenews.pressroom.toyota.com/releases/tms-october-2016-sales-chart.htm, (11/20/2016).
5. U.S. Department of Energy, (2016), Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan, U.S. Department of Energy, retrieved from http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/fuel-cell-technologies-office-multi-year-research-development-and-22.
6. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
7. Kurtz J. Sprik S. Ainscough C. Saur G. , (2015), U.S. Department of Energy Annual Merit Review Proceedings Technology Validation - TV001, retrieved from https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/annual_review15_validation.html, (02/26/2017).
8. 10.1149/1.189646610.1149/1.1896466 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.1061702jes10.1149/2.1061702jes ↗
10. Yu P. T. Gu W. Zhang J. Makharia R. Wagner F. T. Gasteiger H. A. , in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability, Büchi F. N. Inaba M. Schmidt T. J. , eds., p. 29, Springer New York, (2009).
11. Greszler T. A. Robb G. M. Salvador J. P. Lakshmanan B. Gasteiger H. , Shutdown Strategy to Avoid Carbon Corrosion Due to Slow Hydrogen/Air Intrusion Rates, Pat. US 8580445 B2, (2013).
12. 10.1149/1.235619810.1149/1.2356198 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.006 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.019212jes10.1149/2.019212jes ↗
15. 10.1149/1.298197110.1149/1.2981971 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.278100810.1149/1.2781008 ↗
17. Gu · 2010 · 49 · 45
18. 10.1149/2.081306jes10.1149/2.081306jes ↗
19. 10.1149/1.235619910.1149/1.2356199 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.325417010.1149/1.3254170 ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0691706jes10.1149/2.0691706jes ↗
22. 10.1021/ma301999a10.1021/ma301999a ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20130431110.1002/adfm.201304311 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.359814110.1149/1.3598141 ↗
25. 10.1039/b915478g10.1039/b915478g ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.04010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.040 ↗
27. 10.5006/1.358387610.5006/1.3583876 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.053 ↗
29. Yu P. T. Wagner F. T. , Method for Shutting Down a Fuel Cell System Using an Air Purge, Pat.US 2008/0003465 A1, (2008).
30. 10.1149/1.314396510.1149/1.3143965 ↗
31. Carter · 2009 · 6 · 829
32. 10.1149/2.120306jes10.1149/2.120306jes ↗
33. Mathias · Electrochem. Soc. Interface · 2005 · 14 · 2410.1149/2.F05053IF ↗
34. 10.1149/1.240212410.1149/1.2402124 ↗