Challenging Practices of Algebraic Battery Life Models through Statistical Validation and Model Identification via Machine-Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Various modeling techniques are used to predict the capacity fade of Li-ion batteries. Algebraic reduced-order models, which are inherently interpretable and computationally fast, are ideal for use in battery controllers, technoeconomic models, and multi-objective optimizations. For Li-ion batteries with graphite anodes, solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) growth on the graphite surface dominates fade. This fade is often modeled using physically informed equations, such as square-root of time for predicting solvent-diffusion limited SEI growth, and Arrhenius and Tafel-like equations predicting the temperature and state-of-charge rate dependencies. In some cases, completely empirical relationships are proposed. However, statistical validation is rarely conducted to evaluate model optimality, and only a handful of possible models are usually investigated. This article demonstrates a novel procedure for automatically identifying reduced-order degradation models from millions of algorithmically generated equations via bi-level optimization and symbolic regression. Identified models are statistically validated using cross-validation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification via bootstrapping. On a LiFePO4/Graphite cell calendar aging data set, automatically identified models utilizing square-root, power law, stretched exponential, and sigmoidal functions result in greater accuracy and lower uncertainty than models identified by human experts, and demonstrate that previously known physical relationships can be empirically “rediscovered” using machine learning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Ziegler · 2020
2. 2020
3. Reniers · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 379 · 9110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.004 ↗
4. Gailani · Electron · 2020 · 9 · 9010.3390/electronics9010090 ↗
5. Beuse · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 36310.1038/s41560-018-0151-y ↗
6. Birkl · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 341 · 37310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 ↗
7. Petit · Appl. Energy · 2016 · 172 · 39810.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.119 ↗
8. Englberger · Energies · 2019 · 12 · 95510.3390/en12050955 ↗
9. Yang · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 110.1038/s41467-017-02088-w ↗
10. Attia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2020 · 167 · 09053510.1149/1945-7111/ab8ce4 ↗
11. Thomas · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 206 · 37810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.106 ↗
12. Schmitt · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 353 · 18310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.090 ↗
13. Gering · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 228 · 63610.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.052 ↗
14. Schmalstieg · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 257 · 32510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.012 ↗
15. Belt · J. Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 1021310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.067 ↗
16. Rumberg · J. Energy Storage · 2020 · 3010.1016/j.est.2020.101510 ↗
17. Smith · 2017 · 406210.23919/ACC.2017.7963578 ↗
18. Schimpe · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A18110.1149/2.1181714jes ↗
19. Naumann · J. Energy Storage · 2018 · 17 · 15310.1016/j.est.2018.01.019 ↗
20. Naumann · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 45110.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227666 ↗
21. Sarasketa-Zabala · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 275 · 57310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.153 ↗
22. Grolleau · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 255 · 45010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.098 ↗
23. Redondo-Iglesias · J. Energy Storage · 2017 · 13 · 17610.1016/j.est.2017.06.009 ↗
24. Ecker · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 248 · 83910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143 ↗
25. Severson · Nat. Energy · 2019 · 4 · 38310.1038/s41560-019-0356-8 ↗
26. Richardson · J. Energy Storage · 2019 · 23 · 32010.1016/j.est.2019.03.022 ↗
27. Richardson · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 357 · 20910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.004 ↗
28. Hu · Joule · 2020 · 4 · 110.1016/j.joule.2019.11.018 ↗
29. Efron · J. Am. Stat. Assoc. · 2020 · 115 · 63610.1080/01621459.2020.1762613 ↗
30. Murdoch · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2019 · 116 · 4410.1073/pnas.1900654116 ↗
31. Reniers · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A318910.1149/2.0281914jes ↗
32. Aitio · 2020
33. Pozzi · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2019 · 58 · 128610.1021/acs.iecr.8b04580 ↗
34. Park · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · A130910.1149/2.0421807jes ↗
35. Ploehn · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2004 · 151 · A45610.1149/1.1644601 ↗
36. Single · ChemSusChem · 2018 · 11 · 195010.1002/cssc.201800077 ↗
37. von Kolzenberg · 2020
38. Tibshirani · J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. · 1996 · 58 · 26710.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
39. Das · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · E10710.1149/2.0241904jes ↗
40. Attia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · E9710.1149/2.0231904jes ↗
41. Dubarry · Curr. Opin. Electrochem. · 2018 · 9 · 10610.1016/j.coelec.2018.05.023 ↗
42. Cuervo-Reyes · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A146310.1149/2.0611908jes ↗
43. Ecker · J. Power Sources · 2012 · 215 · 24810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.012 ↗
44. Williams · Trans. Faraday Soc. · 1970 · 66 · 8010.1039/tf9706600080 ↗
45. Phillips · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1996 · 59 · 113310.1088/0034-4885/59/9/003 ↗
46. Baghdadi · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 325 · 27310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.036 ↗
47. Mathieu · Energy · 2017 · 141 · 210810.1016/j.energy.2017.11.130 ↗
48. Xiong · Int. J. Food Microbiol. · 1999 · 46 · 4510.1016/S0168-1605(98)00172-X ↗
49. Chen · Bioresour. Technol. · 2017 · 225 · 4810.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.013 ↗
50. Ware · Renew. Energy · 2017 · 104 · 5010.1016/j.renene.2016.11.045 ↗
51. Xun · Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl. · 2020 · 54010.1016/j.physa.2019.122998 ↗
52. Mumbach · Energy Convers. Manag. · 2019 · 20010.1016/j.enconman.2019.112031 ↗
53. Khaleghi Rahimian · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 34810.1016/j.electacta.2020.136343 ↗
54. Eddahech · 2013 · 680610.1109/IECON.2013.6700259 ↗
55. Broussely · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 97–98 · 1310.1016/S0378-7753(01)00722-4 ↗
56. Sarasketa-Zabala · Appl. Energy · 2016 · 162 · 83910.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.115 ↗
57. Käbitz · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 239 · 57210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.045 ↗
58. Lu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · A77510.1149/2.1321704jes ↗
59. Alhaider · 2020 · 156
60. Safari · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A56210.1149/1.3567007 ↗
61. Tian · J. Applied Phys. · 2020 · 12810.1063/5.0012405 ↗
62. King · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 12210.1103/PhysRevLett.122.232502 ↗
63. Kenz · SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantification · 2013 · 1 · 34810.1137/130917867 ↗
64. Koza · 1992
65. Searson · 2015
66. Silva · 2018
67. Schmidt · Science (80-.). · 2009 · 324 · 8110.1126/science.1165893 ↗
68. Bongard · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 994310.1073/pnas.0609476104 ↗
69. Ly · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2012 · 13 · 3585
70. Ghiringhelli · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
71. Ghiringhelli · New J. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 02301710.1088/1367-2630/aa57bf ↗
72. Ouyang · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 2 · 110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.083802 ↗
73. Brunton · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2016 · 113 · 393210.1073/pnas.1517384113 ↗
74. De Silva · Front. Artificial Intell. · 2020 · 3 · 110.3389/frai.2020.00025 ↗
75. Mangan · Proc. R. Soc. A · 2017 · 473 · 2017000910.1098/rspa.2017.0009 ↗
76. Cortiella · 2020
77. Champion · IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 16925910.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023625 ↗
78. 2020
79. Rohatgi · 2020
80. Childs · MRS Commun. · 2019 · 9 · 80610.1557/mrc.2019.90 ↗
81. Menon · Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. · 2017 · 2 · 26310.1039/C7ME00027H ↗
82. Menon · Adv. Theory Simulations · 2019 · 210.1002/adts.201800164 ↗
83. Menon · Front. Mater. · 2019 · 6 · 110.3389/fmats.2019.00087 ↗