Gravure Coating for Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing of Proton-Exchange-Membrane Fuel Cell Catalyst Layers
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate gravure coating as a highly relevant technology for the production of roll-to-roll coated catalyst layers. Our results showed gravure coating is capable of coating multi-meter lengths of platinum on carbon catalyst layers at industrially-relevant loadings. Multiple characterization methods were used to examine the microscale and macroscale morphology of the coated layer. Using full-web inspection it was shown that gravure coating produced uniform films in both the cross-web and down-web directions. Using electron microscopy, it was observed that gravure coating produced catalyst layers with larger pores than catalyst layers produced by ultrasonic spray coating. In situ performance testing of the gravure-coated electrodes showed promising results, though additional modifications to the catalyst layer ink and/or drying process are needed to match the catalytic activity of spray-coated catalyst layers. This study lays the foundation for future process science studies to understand the science of scale up.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Board California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources , 2017 Annual Evaluation of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Deployment and Hydrogen Fuel Station Network Development, (2017).
2. 10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
3. 10.1039/c2ee02936g10.1039/c2ee02936g ↗
4. Baumann R. Willert A. Siegel F. Kohl A. , Method for producing catalyst layers for fuel cells, U. S. Pat. Office. (2012).
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.073 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.1061803jes10.1149/2.1061803jes ↗
7. Neyerlin K. C. Christ J. M. Zack J. W. Gu W. Kumaraguru S. Kongkanand A. , “New Insights from Electrochemical Diagnostics Pertaining to the High Current Density Performance of Pt-Based Catalysts,” 230th ECS Meeting. MA2016-02, 2492 (2016).10.1149/MA2016-02/38/2492 ↗
8. Kistler S. F. Schweizer P. M. , eds., Liquid Film Coating, Chapmap and Hall, 1997.10.1007/978-94-011-5342-3 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.0961706jes10.1149/2.0961706jes ↗
10. 10.1002/app.3984210.1002/app.39842 ↗
11. Myers D. , Rationally Designed Catalyst Layers for PEMFC Performance Optimization, 2016 DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program Review. (2016).
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.09.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.048 ↗
14. 10.1038/pj.2015.3610.1038/pj.2015.36 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.400363210.1115/1.4003632 ↗
16. Pranchk F. R. Coyle D. J. , Elastohydrodynamic Coating Systems, in: Kistler S. F. Schweizer P. M. , (Eds.), Liquid Film Coating, Chapman and Hall, 1997.10.1007/978-94-011-5342-3_17 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.03.00710.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.03.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2017.02.00510.1016/j.jnnfm.2017.02.005 ↗
19. 10.1002/aic.1526810.1002/aic.15268 ↗
20. 10.1002/fuce.20150013710.1002/fuce.201500137 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.109 ↗
22. Rapaport P. A. Blowers A. J. James L. Lakshmanan B. , Fast MEA break-in and voltage recovery , U. S. Pat. Office. 9099703 (2015).
23. Gutoff E. B. Cohen E. D. , Coating and Drying Defects, John Wiley & Sons, 2006.10.1002/0470044136 ↗
24. 10.1017/jfm.2014.17510.1017/jfm.2014.175 ↗
25. 10.1038/srep2650310.1038/srep26503 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.0161411jes10.1149/2.0161411jes ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0451713jes10.1149/2.0451713jes ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.02710.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.027 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.400062910.1115/1.4000629 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ces.2013.05.03910.1016/j.ces.2013.05.039 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0300510.1021/acs.analchem.6b03005 ↗
32. 10.1002/aic.1219010.1002/aic.12190 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0253810.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02538 ↗
34. 10.1021/la102822810.1021/la1028228 ↗
35. 10.1149/1.356294510.1149/1.3562945 ↗