Operando Analysis of Interphase Dynamics in Anode-Free Solid-State Batteries with Sulfide Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Sulfide solid electrolytes (SEs) show promise for Li metal solid-state batteries due to their high ionic conductivities and relative ease of manufacturing. However, many sulfide SEs suffer from limited electrochemical stability against Li metal electrodes. In this work, we use a suite ofoperandoanalytical techniques to investigate the dynamics of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation and the associated effects on Li plating. We contrast a sulfide SE that forms an electrically insulating SEI (Li6PS5Cl) with an SE that forms an SEI with electrically conducting phases present (Li10GeP2S12). Using anode-free cell configurations, where the Li/SE interface is formed against a current collector, we perform complimentaryoperandovideo microscopy andoperandoX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments. The combination of these techniques allows for the interpretation of electrochemical voltage traces during Li plating. The electrically insulating nature of the SEI in Li6PS5Cl facilitates Li metal nucleation and plating after the initial SEI formation. In contrast, in cells that form an electronically conducting SEI, the onset of Li plating is suppressed, which is attributed to a low Faradaic efficiency from continuous SE decomposition. The insights in this study reveal how interphase dynamics control the transition from SEI formation to plating in anode-free solid-state batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 194510.1039/C8EE01053F ↗
2. Gao · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170570210.1002/adma.201705702 ↗
3. Hatzell · ACS Energy Lett. · 2020 · 5 · 92210.1021/acsenergylett.9b02668 ↗
4. Kamaya · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 68210.1038/nmat3066 ↗
5. Seino · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 62710.1039/C3EE41655K ↗
6. Chen · Energy Storage Mater. · 2018 · 14 · 5810.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.020 ↗
7. Park · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8 · 180003510.1002/aenm.201800035 ↗
8. Deiseroth · Angew. Chem. · 2008 · 120 · 76710.1002/ange.200703900 ↗
9. Hayashi · Frontiers in Energy Research · 2016 · 4 · 2510.3389/fenrg.2016.00025 ↗
10. Zhang · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 190113110.1002/adma.201901131 ↗
11. Richards · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 26610.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 ↗
12. Park · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 15010.1021/acsenergylett.0c02372 ↗
13. Tan · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 241810.1021/acsenergylett.9b01693 ↗
14. Strauss · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · 2021 · 2 · 210000410.1002/aesr.202100004 ↗
15. Wood · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 249010.1038/s41467-018-04762-z ↗
16. Wenzel · Solid State Ionics · 2018 · 318 · 10210.1016/j.ssi.2017.07.005 ↗
17. Wenzel · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 240010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00610 ↗
18. Wenzel · Solid State Ionics · 2016 · 286 · 2410.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.034 ↗
19. Sang · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 302910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00034 ↗
20. Schwietert · Nat. Mater. · 2020 · 19 · 42810.1038/s41563-019-0576-0 ↗
21. Lewis · Nat. Mater. · 2021 · 20 · 50310.1038/s41563-020-00903-2 ↗
22. Kasemchainan · Nat. Mater. · 2019 · 18 · 110510.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
23. Chen · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2017 · 19 · 3143610.1039/C7CP05253G ↗
24. Camacho-Forero · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 396 · 78210.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.092 ↗
25. Zhu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 2368510.1021/acsami.5b07517 ↗
26. Bron · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 352 · 12710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.103 ↗
27. Sakuma · Solid State Ionics · 2016 · 285 · 10110.1016/j.ssi.2015.07.010 ↗
28. Zhu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2016 · 4 · 325310.1039/C5TA08574H ↗
29. Mo · Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 1510.1021/cm203303y ↗
30. Davis · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2020 · 8 · 629110.1039/C9TA11508K ↗
31. Lewis · Trends in Chemistry · 2019 · 1 · 84510.1016/j.trechm.2019.06.013 ↗
32. Neudecker · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2000 · 147 · 51710.1149/1.1393226 ↗
33. Tian · Nano Energy · 2020 · 78 · 10534410.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105344 ↗
34. Lee · Nat. Energy · 2020 · 5 · 29910.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
35. Wang · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 110.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 ↗
36. Weber · Nat. Energy · 2019 · 4 · 68310.1038/s41560-019-0428-9 ↗
37. Wood · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 449310.1021/acsaem.8b00406 ↗
38. Wu · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 110.1038/s41467-017-02088-w ↗
39. Wood · ACS Central Science · 2016 · 2 · 79010.1021/acscentsci.6b00260 ↗
40. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 1167110.1039/C7TA00371D ↗
41. Fang · Nature · 2019 · 572 · 51110.1038/s41586-019-1481-z ↗
42. Kazyak · Matter · 2020 · 2 · 102510.1016/j.matt.2020.02.008 ↗