The Impact of Ink and Spray Variables on Catalyst Layer Properties, Electrolyzer Performance, and Electrolyzer Durability
Source abstract
Abstract
In proton exchange membrane-based electrolysis, cell-level performance and durability is affected not only by individual components, but also by how those components are integrated into membrane electrode assemblies. In this study, several ink and ultrasonic spray parameters are evaluated for their effect on catalyst layer properties, electrolyzer performance, and electrolyzer durability. The relative impact of these variables on kinetic and ohmic loss were revealed and linked to catalyst layer morphology. Ionomer loading and dispersion principally affect kinetics and accelerate kinetic loss over time. Catalyst layer uniformity, however, tends to affect ohmic loss, where poor catalyst-transport layer contact adds resistances, increases ohmic loss, and accelerates ohmic loss over time. These efforts to understand catalyst layer formation and the impact of catalyst layer properties on electrolyzer performance and durability aid in the establishment of robust baselines and better inform component development efforts and manufacturing processes. Separating losses and quantifying how losses change during extended operation are also useful as a diagnostics approach to elucidate why suboptimal performance/durability occurs and develop strategies to mitigate loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Pivovar · The Electrochemical Society Interface · 2018 · 27 · 4710.1149/2.F04181if ↗
2. H2 at Scale
3. 2018
4. Babic · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2017 · 164 · F38710.1149/2.1441704jes ↗
5. Ayers · Annual review of chemical and biomolecular Engineering · 2019 · 10 · 21910.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-030241 ↗
6. Ayers · Current Opinion in Electrochemistry · 2019 · 18 · 910.1016/j.coelec.2019.08.008 ↗
7. Grigoriev · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 2044010.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.043 ↗
8. Weiß · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F48710.1149/2.0421908jes ↗
9. Alia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 16610.1149/2.0231915jes ↗
10. Babic · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 45110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227778 ↗
11. Schuler · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F55510.1149/2.1241908jes ↗
12. Rakousky · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 278 · 32410.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.154 ↗
13. Liu · Electrochem. Commun. · 2018 · 97 · 9610.1016/j.elecom.2018.10.021 ↗
14. Jung · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 194 · 97210.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.030 ↗
15. Rakousky · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 326 · 12010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.082 ↗
16. Reier · ACS Catal. · 2012 · 2 · 176510.1021/cs3003098 ↗
17. Danilovic · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2014 · 5 · 247410.1021/jz501061n ↗
18. Pourbaix · 1974
19. Ayers · High Efficiency Pem Water Electrolysis Enabled by Advanced Catalysts, Membranes and processes · 2019
20. Xu · High-Performance, Long-Lifetime Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis · 2017
21. Alia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F28210.1149/2.0731904jes ↗
22. Alia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 16610.1149/2.0771915jes ↗
23. Alia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 16310.1149/2.0151611jes ↗
24. Lewinski · ECS Trans. · 2015 · 69 · 89310.1149/06917.0893ecst ↗
25. Zhao · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F8210.1149/2.0981802jes ↗
26. Ayers · Catal. Today · 2016 · 262 · 12110.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.019 ↗
27. Suermann · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F64510.1149/2.1451910jes ↗
28. Rakousky · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 342 · 3810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.118 ↗
29. Ayers · ECS Trans. · 2010 · 33 · 310.1149/1.3484496 ↗
30. Bessarabov · ECS Trans. · 2016 · 75 · 116510.1149/07514.1165ecst ↗
31. Hamdan · Electrochemical Compression · 2017
32. Wei · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2010 · 35 · 395110.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.153 ↗
33. Babic · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 16510.1149/2.0031815jes ↗
34. Kang · Nano Energy · 2018 · 47 · 43410.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.015 ↗
35. Alia · H2@Scale: Experimental Characterization of Durability of Advanced ElectrolyzerConcepts in Dynamic Loading · 2019
36. Ayers · High Efficiency PEM Water Electrolysis Enabled by Advanced Catalysts, Membranes and Processes · 2020
37. Alia · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2016 · 16310.1149/2.0071611jes ↗
38. Cottis · 1999
39. Tan · J. Catal. · 2019 · 371 · 5710.1016/j.jcat.2019.01.018 ↗
40. Mansfeld · 1993
41. Alia · H2@Scale: Experimental Characterization of Durability of Advanced ElectrolyzerConcepts in Dynamic Loading · 2018
42. Trinke · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · F46510.1149/2.0171908jes ↗
43. Xu · High-Performance, Long-Lifetime Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis · 2015
44. Khandavalli · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 4506810.1021/acsami.9b14415 ↗