Evaluating the Effects of Temperature and Pressure on Li/PEO-LiTFSI Interfacial Stability and Kinetics
Source abstract
Abstract
We hypothesized that pressure and temperature affect Li metal solid-state battery (LMSB) resistance and susceptibility to Li metal penetration during cycling. To validate this, the kinetics and stability of the Li-solid electrolyte interface was studied using the model polymer electrolyte system: Li/Polyethylene oxide-LiTFSI (PEO-LiTFSI). It was determined that the interface impedance decreased with increasing pressure and was invariant above 400 and 200 kPa at 60 and 80°C, respectively. In tests to determine susceptibility to Li metal penetration as a function of current density, it was determined that the current density at which Li metal penetrates PEO-LiTFSI, was consistently 0.5 mA/cm 2 for all temperatures tested (60, 80, and 100°C). To gain a mechanistic understanding of how Li metal penetrates a solid electrolyte at and above the current density for onset of Li metal penetration, an operando optical visual cell was used. A clear correlation between erratic DC polarization behavior and the onset and propagation of Li metal penetration was made. The empirical observations in this study could help better understand the factors that affect the kinetics and stability of the Li-solid electrolyte interface. We believe these findings could help to advance the maturity of LMSB.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
2. 10.1038/507026a10.1038/507026a ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0065010.1021/acsenergylett.6b00650 ↗
5. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.11410.1038/nenergy.2016.114 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0322310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03223 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.02710.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.027 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)10092-510.1016/S0013-4686(97)10092-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.04310.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.043 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.04710.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.047 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0237775110.1007/BF02377751 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)01012-810.1016/S0167-2738(01)01012-8 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.148309810.1149/1.1483098 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.160999710.1149/1.1609997 ↗
15. 10.1149/1.139408410.1149/1.1394084 ↗
16. 10.1016/0378-7753(93)80097-910.1016/0378-7753(93)80097-9 ↗
17. Odian George , Principles of polymerization, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.10.1002/047147875X ↗
18. Ferry John D. , Viscoelastic properties of polymers, John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
19. 10.1149/1.185085410.1149/1.1850854 ↗
20. Samsonov Gregory V. , Handbook of the Physicochemical Properties of the Elements, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
21. 10.1038/srep2012810.1038/srep20128 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0385410.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03854 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00242-010.1016/S0378-7753(98)00242-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.02.00410.1016/j.electacta.2006.02.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.078 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.05310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.053 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.1990002030410.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.044 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00437-510.1016/S0013-4686(99)00437-5 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0300210.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002 ↗
31. 10.1021/acscentsci.6b0026010.1021/acscentsci.6b00260 ↗