Impact of Catalyst Ink Dispersing Solvent on PEM Fuel Cell Performance and Durability
Source abstract
Abstract
The dispersing solvent used for fuel cell catalyst ink preparation plays a vital role in establishing the resulting morphology of the electrode layers, which in turn will impact the performance of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. In this study, we report the impact of various ionomer dispersion solvents on PEM fuel cell performance and durability; two aqueous (1-propanol/water and 2-propanol/water) and several non-aqueous dispersing solvents (ethylene glycol and 1,2-butanediol) are compared. The cathode catalyst layer (CCL) fabricated using inks prepared with 1-propanol/water (3:1, w/w) exhibited the best initial performance followed by the CCL prepared using ethylene glycol. The CCLs made from non-aqueous ethylene glycol and 1,2-butanediol exhibited the best durability upon accelerated stress testing. Scanning transmission electron microscopy combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy indicated that, after the stress test, the distribution of both the Nafion ionomer and Pt nanoparticles within the CCLs prepared with non-aqueous ionomer dispersions underwent less change than those prepared with aqueous dispersions, which is responsible for the improved durability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Lucia · Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. · 2014 · 30 · 16410.1016/j.rser.2013.09.025 ↗
2. Barbir · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1997 · 21 · 89110.1016/0360-3199(96)00030-4 ↗
3. Wilson · J. Appl. Electrochem. · 1992 · 22 · 110.1007/BF01093004 ↗
4. Xin · ACS Catal. · 2016 · 6 · 264210.1021/acscatal.5b02722 ↗
5. Susac · ECS Trans. · 2011 · 41 · 62910.1149/1.3635596 ↗
6. Borup · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 390410.1021/cr050182l ↗
7. Takahashi · Chemelectrochem · 2015 · 2 · 156010.1002/celc.201500131 ↗
8. Zamel · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 309 · 14110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.091 ↗
9. Hatzell · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 2052710.1039/C7TA07255D ↗
10. Dixit · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F26410.1149/2.0191805jes ↗
11. Sharma · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 3812510.1021/acsami.8b14622 ↗
12. Yang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 653010.1021/acsami.6b12949 ↗
13. Fernández · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 151 · 1810.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.048 ↗
14. Polymers in membrane electrode assemblies
15. Kim · 2011
16. Welch · ACS Macro Letters · 2012 · 1 · 140310.1021/mz3005204 ↗
17. Kim · Macromolecules · 2015 · 48 · 216110.1021/ma502538k ↗
18. Choi · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · F115410.1149/2.0151412jes ↗
19. Kim · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 47810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.015 ↗
20. Doo · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1783510.1021/acsami.8b01751 ↗
21. Lee · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1073910.1038/s41598-018-28779-y ↗
22. Chisaka · Electrochim. Acta · 2006 · 51 · 482810.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.018 ↗
23. Lee · Fuel Cells · 2018 · 18 · 12910.1002/fuce.201700178 ↗
24. Jung · Solid State Ionics · 2011 · 196 · 7310.1016/j.ssi.2011.06.003 ↗
25. Mukundan · ECS Transactions · 2008 · 16 · 193910.1149/1.2982034 ↗
26. Kim · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2014 · 16 · 592710.1039/C4CP00496E ↗
27. Berlinger · ACS Applied Polymer Materials · 2020 · 2 · 582410.1021/acsapm.0c01076 ↗
28. Gupit · Macromolecules · 2020 · 53 · 146410.1021/acs.macromol.9b02314 ↗
29. Tarokh · Macromolecules · 2020 · 53 · 28810.1021/acs.macromol.9b01663 ↗
30. Dudenas · Macromolecules · 2019 · 52 · 777910.1021/acs.macromol.9b01024 ↗
31. Ly · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 47810.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228516 ↗
32. Lee · ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. · 2020 · 2 · 180710.1021/acsapm.0c00042 ↗
33. Sharma · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2019 · 226 · 6610.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.015 ↗
34. Evolution of the interfacial structure of a catalyst ink with the quality of the dispersing solvent: a contrast variation small-angle and ultrasmall-angle neutron scattering investigation10.1021/acsami.8b20645 ↗
35. Experimental and theoretical analysis of ink dispersion stability for polymer electrolyte fuel cell applications10.1149/2.0961706jes ↗
36. Guo · Electroch. Energ. Rev. · 2021 · 4 · 6710.1007/s41918-020-00083-2 ↗
37. Doo · ACS Appl. Mater. & Interf. · 2018 · 10 · 1783510.1021/acsami.8b01751 ↗
38. Kim · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 47810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.015 ↗
39. Ann · Sci. Adv. · 2020 · 610.1126/sciadv.aaw0870 ↗
40. Watanabe · J. Microsc. · 2006 · 221 · 8910.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01549.x ↗
41. Kneer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · F324110.1149/2.0271806jes ↗
42. Li · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 271 · 56110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.036 ↗
43. Cho · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2011 · 36 · 1246510.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.113 ↗
44. Wang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2015 · 40 · 464910.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.027 ↗
45. Interfacial Behavior of Polymer Electrolytes in Fuel Cell Electrodes
46. “The solubility parameter of Nafion” advances in materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells system
47. 2007
48. Langlois · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 396 · 34510.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.013 ↗