journal article·2017Open access

Impact of Dynamic Driving Loads and Regenerative Braking on the Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles

Peter Keil, Andreas Jossen

Abstract

In an electric vehicle (EV), the battery load profiles differ considerably from standard laboratory test procedures, which typically apply constant currents for discharging. Due to the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle, the battery load is highly dynamic and also contains recharging pulses with higher currents due to regenerative braking. This paper presents an experimental aging study based on a representative driving load profile to investigate battery aging in EVs. The aging study focusses on the impact of regenerative braking on battery aging at different temperatures and SoCs. Moreover, it examines different cycle depths and compares dynamic driving loads to constant current discharging. The study reveals different sensitivities of calendar aging and cycle aging to temperature: Whereas calendar aging decreases with lower temperature, cycle aging increases and also becomes sensitive to the dynamics of the load profile. Cycling up to 200,000 km exhibits that regenerative braking has a beneficial effect on the battery lifetime as it reduces the cycle depth. This lowers the capacity fade and the resistance increase considerably. Furthermore, our paper explains capacity recovery effects occurring after cycling at high SoCs only and presents basic strategies to minimize battery degradation in EVs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.14310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.15310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.153 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.08710.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.087 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.est.2016.02.00510.1016/j.est.2016.02.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.13010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.130 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.216158010.1149/1.2161580 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.065 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.06010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.060 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.058 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.010 ↗
13. 10.1149/05026.0235ecst10.1149/05026.0235ecst ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.047 ↗
15. 10.1109/TIE.2009.202528310.1109/TIE.2009.2025283 ↗
16. 10.1109/TSG.2011.216481610.1109/TSG.2011.2164816 ↗
17. 10.1109/TVT.2014.230559310.1109/TVT.2014.2305593 ↗
18. 10.1109/TSG.2011.215025010.1109/TSG.2011.2150250 ↗
19. 10.1109/TII.2014.233423310.1109/TII.2014.2334233 ↗
20. Keil P. Jossen A. , Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles: Impact of Regenerative Braking, Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS28), Goyang, Korea, 2015.10.3390/wevj7010041 ↗
21. dieselnet, Emission Test Cycles: Worldwide engine and vehicle test cycles, available at www.dieselnet.com/standards/cycles (accessed on January 6, 2017).
22. Danzer M. A. Liebau V. Maglia F. , Aging of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles, in: Advances in Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 359.10.1016/B978-1-78242-377-5.00014-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.01210.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.012 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.041 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.0411609jes10.1149/2.0411609jes ↗
26. 10.1149/2.0091701jes10.1149/2.0091701jes ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.03010.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.030 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.073 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.187273710.1149/1.1872737 ↗
30. 10.1149/1.140373010.1149/1.1403730 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.041 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.11210.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.112 ↗
33. 10.1149/2.003308jes10.1149/2.003308jes ↗
34. 10.1149/2.009303jes10.1149/2.009303jes ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.08010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.080 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.03210.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.032 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.044 ↗
38. Pistoia G. batteries Lithium-ion , Advances and applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014.
39. 10.1149/2.0461506jes10.1149/2.0461506jes ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.11010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.110 ↗
41. Comparison of the surface changes on cathode during long term storage testing of high energy density cylindrical lithium-ion cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.028 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.10310.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.103 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.09110.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.091 ↗
44. 10.1149/2.0191503jes10.1149/2.0191503jes ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.13310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.133 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.090 ↗
47. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::AID-ADMA725>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::AID-ADMA725>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
48. 10.1149/1.222084910.1149/1.2220849 ↗
49. United States Advanced Battery Consortium, USABC Goals for Advanced Batteries for EVs - CY 2020 Commercialization, available at http://www.uscar.org/commands/files_download.php?files_id=364 (accessed on February 19, 2017).