journal article·2011

Li Doped CuO Film Electrodes for Photoelectrochemical Cells

Chia-Ying Chiang, Yoon Shin, Sheryl Ehrman

Publisher page

Abstract

Li is known for its ability to increase the conductivity of CuO films. Li doped CuO nanoparticles prepared by flame spray pyrolysis and followed by spin coating for the film preparation were studied at dopant concentrations of 0.5 at %, 2 at %, 3.5 at % and 5 at %. The photocurrent density and photon-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency increased by a factor of five to ten when introducing Li into CuO. This is attributable to the increase in the electrical conductivity of the film by almost two orders of magnitude, i.e. from 2 × 10 −6 ∼ 4 × 10 −6 S/cm to 7 × 10 −5 ∼ 3 × 10 −4 S/cm, and thus the increase in the lifetime of the photogenerated charge carriers. The best photocurrent density and photon-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency was 1.69 mA/cm 2 and 1.3%, respectively, corresponding to the film prepared by 2.0 at % Li-CuO sintered at 450°C for 1 hr with the thickness 1.7 μm at bias voltage of −0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 1M KOH and under 1 sun illumination. Furthermore, the charge carrier density was estimated based on the Mott-Schottky plot to be 4.2 × 10 21 cm −3 which is almost double the charge carrier densities obtained by other doping conditions. The high carrier charge density was also confirmed by the higher photocurrent density.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00022-810.1016/S0360-3199(02)00022-8 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.00410.1016/j.pecs.2008.07.004 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.223.4641.114110.1126/science.223.4641.1141 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.01410.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.014 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp076422d10.1021/jp076422d ↗
6. 10.1002/cssc.20080008710.1002/cssc.200800087 ↗
7. 10.1038/3510460710.1038/35104607 ↗
8. Chauhan · , Bull Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 29 · 709
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.01210.1016/j.electacta.2004.05.012 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.178915510.1149/1.1789155 ↗
11. 10.1016/0040-6090(79)90504-210.1016/0040-6090(79)90504-2 ↗
12. Samarasekara · Chinese J. of Phys. · 2006 · 44 · 377
13. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.07.02010.1016/j.jpcs.2009.07.020 ↗
14. 10.1002/cvde.20100687310.1002/cvde.201006873 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.04110.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.041 ↗
16. Chiang C. Y. Shin Y. Aroh K. Ehrman S. H. , Environ. Sci. Tech., (2011); submitted.
17. Chiang C. Y. Aroh K. Ehrman S. H. . Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., HE 8787.
18. Bockris J. O. M. Khan S. U. M. , Surface electrochemistry, a molecular level approach, Springer, New York (1993).10.1007/978-1-4615-3040-4 ↗
19. 10.1143/JJAP.31.248810.1143/JJAP.31.2488 ↗
20. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.181-182.11310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.181-182.113 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0038-1098(02)00663-410.1016/S0038-1098(02)00663-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-3697(95)00130-110.1016/0022-3697(95)00130-1 ↗
23. 10.1002/cctc.20100008310.1002/cctc.201000083 ↗
24. Fatih K. Marsan B. , http://www.electrochem.org/dl/ma/201/pdfs/1372.pdf
25. 10.1063/1.33056710.1063/1.330567 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00347-910.1016/S0013-4686(00)00347-9 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.213326910.1149/1.2133269 ↗