journal article·2022-03-01

State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on TCN-LSTM Neural Networks

Chunsheng Hu, Fangjuan Cheng, Liang Ma, Bohao Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Accurately estimating the state of charge (SOC) of lithium-ion batteries is critical for developing more reliable and efficient operation of electric vehicles. However, the commonly used models cannot simultaneously extract effective spatial and temporal features from the original data, leading to an inefficient SOC estimation. This paper proposes a novel neural network method for accurate and robust battery SOC estimation, which incorporates the temporal convolutional network (TCN) and the long short-term memory (LSTM), namely TCN-LSTM model. Specifically, the TCN is employed to extract more advanced spatial features among multivariate variables, and the LSTM captures long-term dependencies from time-series data and maps battery temporal information into current SOC and historical inputs. The proposed model performs well in various estimation conditions. The average value of mean absolute error, root mean square error, and maximum error of SOC estimation achieve 0.48%, 0.60%, and 2.3% at multiple temperature conditions, respectively, and reach 0.70%, 0.81%, and 2.7% for a different battery, respectively. In addition, the proposed method has better accuracy than the LSTM or TCN used independently and the CNN-LSTM network. The computational burden with varying length of input is also investigated. In summary, experiment results show that the proposed method has excellent generalization and robustness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Hu · Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. · 2019 · 11410.1016/j.rser.2019.109334 ↗
2. Hossain Lipu · J. Clean. Prod. · 2020 · 27710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124110 ↗
3. Ding · Electrochem. Energy Rev. · 2019 · 2 · 110.1007/s41918-018-0022-z ↗
4. Coman · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2021 · 16810.1149/1945-7111/ac2dcb ↗
5. Mei · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A331910.1149/2.0741914jes ↗
6. Tian · Energy Storage Mater. · 2021 · 37 · 28310.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.018 ↗
7. Wang · Appl. Sci. · 2020 · 10 · 126410.3390/app10041264 ↗
8. Zine · Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Syst. · 2018 · 19 · 110.1515/ijeeps-2017-0181。 ↗
9. Li · Energy · 2016 · 109 · 93310.1016/j.energy.2016.05.047 ↗
10. La Rue · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A404110.1149/2.0221916jes ↗
11. Boulmrharj · J. Energy Storage · 2020 · 30 · 110.1016/j.est.2020.101518 ↗
12. Sandoval-chileño · México, J. Energy Storage · 2020 · 3110.1016/j.est.2020.101718 ↗
13. Gaouzi · Electr. Power Components Syst. · 2021 · 48 · 216810.1080/15325008.2021.1913262 ↗
14. Niu · J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng. · 2021 · 21 · 25710.3233/JCM-204537 ↗
15. He · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2021 · 16 · 110.20964/2021.05.55 ↗
16. Deng · Energy · 2020 · 20510.1016/j.energy.2020.118000 ↗
18. Shu · IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. · 2021 · 7 · 127110.1109/TTE.2020.3041757 ↗
19. Danko · in Transportation Research Procedia · 2019 · 40 · 18610.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.029 ↗
20. Farmann · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 347 · 110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.098 ↗
21. Hu · Energy · 2022 · 24610.1016/j.energy.2022.123404 ↗
22. Tian · Appl. Energy · 2021 · 29110.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116812 ↗
23. Campestrini · J. Energy Storage · 2017 · 12 · 14910.1016/j.est.2017.04.011 ↗
24. Luo · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2020 · 44 · 1053810.1002/er.5687 ↗
25. Wang · J. Energy Storage · 2017 · 9 · 6910.1016/j.est.2016.09.008 ↗
26. He · Energies · 2013 · 6 · 413410.3390/en6084134 ↗
27. Ma · Appl. Sci. · 2019 · 9 · 276510.3390/app9132765 ↗
28. Zhang · Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. · 2011 · 33 · 47210.1016/j.ijepes.2010.10.010 ↗
29. Zeng · Energies · 2018 · 11 · 5910.3390/en11010059 ↗
30. Li · Energy · 2021 · 22010.1016/j.energy.2021.119767 ↗
31. Zhang · IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2017 · 32 · 442110.1109/TPEL.2016.2603229 ↗
32. Alvarez Anton · IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2013 · 28 · 591910.1109/TPEL.2013.2243918 ↗
33. Hu · J. Power Sources · 2014 · 269 · 68210.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.016 ↗
34. Li · IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 19539810.1109/ACCESS.2020.3033451 ↗
35. Li · J. Van Mierlo, and N. Omar, Appl. Energy · 2018 · 232 · 19710.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.182 ↗
36. Zhang · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · A67910.1149/2.0811904jes ↗
37. Chemali · IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. · 2018 · 65 · 673010.1109/TIE.2017.2787586 ↗
38. Bockrath · 2019 · p.250710.1109/IECON.2019.8926815 ↗
39. Bengio · IEEE Trans. Neural Networks · 1994 · 5 · 15710.1109/72.279181 ↗
40. Jiao · J. Power Sources · 2020 · 45910.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228051 ↗
41. Ren · Energy · 2021 · 23410.1016/j.energy.2021.121236 ↗
42. Chen · Energy · 2021 · 22710.1016/j.energy.2021.120451 ↗
43. Roy · J. Neural Eng. · 2019 · 1610.1088/1741-2552/ab260c ↗
44. Lara-Benítez · Appl. Sci. · 2020 · 10 · 110.3390/app10072322 ↗
45. Kim · Energy Build. · 2019 · 194 · 32810.1016/j.enbuild.2019.04.034 ↗
46. Almalaq · IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 152010.1109/ACCESS.2018.2887023 ↗
47. Melzer · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. · 2015 · 9 · 165010.1109/JSTSP.2015.2465298 ↗
48. Tian · Inform · 2021 · 45 · 64310.31449/inf.v45i5.3559 ↗
49. Zhao · IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 11449610.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935504 ↗
50. Li · Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. · 2020 · 2020 · 110.1155/2020/6896579 ↗
52. Zhou · IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 5330710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981261 ↗
53. Liu · IEEE Access · 2021 · 9 · 3417710.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057371 ↗
54. Zhao · IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 9816810.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996225 ↗
55. Song · IEEE Access · 2019 · 7 · 8889410.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926517 ↗
56. Tian · Appl. Energy · 2020 · 26510.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114789 ↗
57. Kollmeyer · Mendeley Data · 2018 · VI · 110.17632/wykht8y7tg.1 ↗
58. Ma · J. Energy Storage · 2021 · 3710.1016/j.est.2021.102440 ↗