journal article·2014Open access

Maximizing Energetic Efficiency in Flow Batteries Utilizing Non-Newtonian Fluids

Kyle C. Smith, Yet-Ming Chiang, W. Craig Carter

Abstract

High energy density flow batteries provide a potential solution to large-scale electrical energy storage needs. The high energy density fluid electrodes for such devices will typically have non-Newtonian rheology, especially when formulated as suspensions which increase electrical conductivity, energy density, or both [M. Duduta et al., Adv. Energy Mater. , 1 , 511 (2011); Z. Li et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 15 , 15833 (2013)]. A computational model that simulates electrochemical kinetics and flow is used to quantify coulombic and energetic efficiency under various flow conditions, taking as examples flow electrodes that contain suspensions of active materials (LiFePO 4 , LiCoO 2 ) or conductive networks in redox solution (vanadium redox). Intermittent flow pulses of controlled volume and duration are found to incur less than half the electrochemical losses of continuous pumping. Increased slip and yield stress are shown to increase flow uniformity, energetic efficiency, and discharge energy. From these findings a general strategy is derived for the maximization of efficiency in energy-dense flow batteries applicable to arbitrary cell designs, suspension types, and operating conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Crabtree G. , Integrating Renewable Electricity on the Grid, American Physical Society, (2010) http://www.aps.org/policy/reports/popa-reports/upload/integratingelec.pdf.
2. Ever J. Corey G. , Energy Storage for the Electricity Grid: Benefits and Market Potential Assessment Guide, Sandia National Laboratories, (2010).
3. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20110015210.1002/aenm.201100152 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja201118f10.1021/ja201118f ↗
7. 10.1039/c3ee00072a10.1039/c3ee00072a ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.00610.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.006 ↗
9. 10.1039/c3cp53428f10.1039/c3cp53428f ↗
10. 10.1149/2.071208jes10.1149/2.071208jes ↗
11. 10.1149/2.002304jes10.1149/2.002304jes ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20110076810.1002/aenm.201100768 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.03710.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.037 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.10110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.101 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20120069410.1002/adfm.201200694 ↗
16. 10.1039/c2ra21342g10.1039/c2ra21342g ↗
17. Chiang Y. M. Carter W. C. Ho B. Duduta M. , Int’l Patent Application No, WO2009151639A1, (2009).
18. Carter W. C. Chiang Y.-M. Duduta M. Limthongkul P. , Int’l Patent Application No, WO2012083233A1 (2012).
19. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.09.01310.1016/j.elecom.2010.09.013 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.020 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.10.00610.1016/j.elecom.2009.10.006 ↗
22. 10.1021/ar300179v10.1021/ar300179v ↗
23. Smith K. C. Brunini V. E. Dong Y. Chiang Y.-M. Carter W. C. , unpublished work.
24. 10.1149/1.183757110.1149/1.1837571 ↗
25. 10.1016/0025-5408(80)90012-410.1016/0025-5408(80)90012-4 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.222118410.1149/1.2221184 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.187273710.1149/1.1872737 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.06710.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.067 ↗
29. 10.1039/c1cp22638j10.1039/c1cp22638j ↗
30. Newman J. S. , Electrochemical systems, 2nd ed., p. 560, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J (1991).
31. Ho B. , Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2012).
32. 10.1039/c3cp51371h10.1039/c3cp51371h ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.01040410.1103/PhysRevE.80.010404 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.07910.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.079 ↗
35. 10.1149/1.135919710.1149/1.1359197 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.351590210.1149/1.3515902 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.034 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.187079410.1149/1.1870794 ↗
39. 10.1149/1.298042010.1149/1.2980420 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.02510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.025 ↗
41. Pourbaix M. , Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions (1974).10.1007/978-1-4684-1806-4_4 ↗
42. Thomas K. E. Newman J. S. Darling R. M. , in Advances in Lithium-Ion Batteries, p. 354, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers (2002).
43. 10.1002/adfm.20080161710.1002/adfm.200801617 ↗
44. 10.1109/CEIDP.2007.445147010.1109/CEIDP.2007.4451470 ↗
45. Hess W. M. Herd C. R. , in Carbon black: science and technology, Dekker, New York (1993).
46. Patankar S. , Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, 1st ed., p. 214, Taylor & Francis, (1980).10.1201/9781482234213 ↗
47. Notay Y. , AGMG software and documentation http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~ynotay/AGMG.
48. Notay · Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. · 2010 · 37 · 123
49. 10.1137/10081850910.1137/100818509 ↗
50. 10.1137/11083534710.1137/110835347 ↗
51. 10.1122/1.55038710.1122/1.550387 ↗
52. 10.1021/ie50579a03510.1021/ie50579a035 ↗
53. 10.1016/0300-9467(72)80010-810.1016/0300-9467(72)80010-8 ↗
54. Probstein R. F. , Physicochemical hydrodynamics: an introduction, Wiley-Interscience (2005).
55. 10.1122/1.187904310.1122/1.1879043 ↗
56. 10.1016/0377-0257(88)85048-110.1016/0377-0257(88)85048-1 ↗
57. 10.1016/0377-0257(94)01282-M10.1016/0377-0257(94)01282-M ↗
58. 10.1021/ie00051a01210.1021/ie00051a012 ↗
59. 10.1021/la00048a03010.1021/la00048a030 ↗