journal article·2018Open access

Electrochemical Performance and Preliminary Post-Mortem Analysis of a Solid Oxide Cell Stack with 20,000 h of Operation

Qingping Fang, Carolin E. Frey, Norbert H. Menzler, Ludger Blum

Abstract

A long-term test with a two-layer solid oxide cell stack was carried out for more than 20,000 hours. The stack was mainly characterized in a furnace environment in electrolysis mode, with 50% humidification of H 2 at 800°C. The endothermic operation was carried out with a current density of −0.5 Acm −2 and steam conversion rate of 50%. Electrolysis at lower temperatures (i.e., 700°C and 750°C) and fuel cell operation (with 0.5 Acm −2 and fuel utilization of 50%) at 800°C were also carried out (<2000 h each) for comparison. The voltage and area specific resistance degradation rates were ∼0.6%/kh and 8.2%/kh after ∼18,460 hours of operation. In total, the stack was operated above 700°C for more than 20,000 hours. Impedance measurement and analysis showed that the increase of ohmic resistance was the main degradation phenomenon, while electrode polarizations were kept nearly constant before a severe burning took place in one layer. Ni-depletion in fuel electrodes was confirmed during post-mortem analysis, which was assumed to be the major degradation mechanism observed. The stack performance and degradation analysis under different working conditions, as well as the results of preliminary post-mortem analysis will be presented.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.349586010.1149/1.3495860 ↗
2. Fang Q. Heinrich M. Wunderlich C. , Crofer22 APU in Real SOFC Stacks, in Advances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells VII: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Volume 32 (eds Bansal N. P. Singh P. Widjaja S. Singh D. ,), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA (2011).
3. 10.1149/06603.0023ecst10.1149/06603.0023ecst ↗
4. Megel S. Kusnezoff M. Beckert W. Trofimenko N. Dosch C. Weder A. Jahn M. Michaelis A. Bienert C. Brandner M. Skrabs S. Schulmeyer W. V. Sigl L. S. , CFY-Stacks: Progress in Development , in In Proceedings of 12th European SOFC and SOE Forum, A0908, European Fuel Cell Forum (2016).
5. 10.1002/fuce.20160019410.1002/fuce.201600194 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0491510jes10.1149/2.0491510jes ↗
7. 10.1002/fuce.20120015110.1002/fuce.201200151 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.356999410.1149/1.3569994 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.14010.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.140 ↗
10. 10.1149/07801.1791ecst10.1149/07801.1791ecst ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.19210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.192 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.0941508jes10.1149/2.0941508jes ↗
13. Szász J. Klotz D. Menzler N. H. Ivers-Tiffée E. , Towards large-scale/industrial Fabrication of Anode-Supported Cells – Detailed Performance Study of Different Coating Techniques for Anode and Electrolyte , In Proceedings of 11th European SOFC and SOE Forum, A1101, European Fuel Cell Forum (2014).
14. 10.1149/1.272913210.1149/1.2729132 ↗
15. 10.1149/05701.2691ecst10.1149/05701.2691ecst ↗
16. 10.1016/0010-4655(92)90132-I10.1016/0010-4655(92)90132-I ↗
17. 10.1149/2.076202jes10.1149/2.076202jes ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.06110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.061 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.18810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.188 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.019 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.04510.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.045 ↗
22. Zheng Y. Wang J. Yu B. Zhang W. Chen J. Qiao J. Zhang J. , Chemical Society Reviews., 5, (2017).
23. 10.1007/s11434-015-0946-110.1007/s11434-015-0946-1 ↗
24. Leonide A. , SOFC Modelling and Parameter Identification by Means of Impedance Spectroscopy . Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe (2010).10.1149/1.3247567 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.003 ↗
26. 10.1002/fuce.20160022210.1002/fuce.201600222 ↗