Modeling of Li-Ion Cells for Fast Simulation of High C-Rate and Low Temperature Operations
Source abstract
Abstract
Evaluation of Li-ion cell performance and life requires the ability to predict behavior at extreme conditions, such as low temperatures and high C-rates. Most electrochemical models assuming constant electrolyte diffusion properties fail to accurately predict the electrode and electrolyte potential at such conditions. This study presents a physics-based Extended Single Particle Model (ESPM) designed specifically for accurately predicting the behavior of a Li-ion cell at extreme conditions, incorporating concentration-dependent properties in the electrolyte diffusion dynamics. Since the proposed model aims at supporting long-term simulation, virtual design and optimization studies, minimization of the computational complexity is achieved through analytical Model Order Reduction (MOR) based on a Galerkin projection method. Results show that the implementation of the concentration-dependent diffusion properties leads to significant improvement of model accuracy at extreme conditions. The Reduced Order Model (ROM) can be simulated significantly faster than numerical methods with no loss of accuracy, supporting simulation of long-term usage cycles (10-year) and remaining useful life calculations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.022 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.047304jes10.1149/2.047304jes ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.17810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.178 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
6. 10.1109/MCS.2010.93629310.1109/MCS.2010.936293 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.070 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.04510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.045 ↗
9. Fan G. Pan K. Bartlett A. Canova M. Rizzoni G. , in ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, TX (2014).
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.03010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.030 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.17910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.179 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.183891810.1149/1.1838918 ↗
13. Prada · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · 910.1149/2.064209jes ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.12010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.120 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.084 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.12910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.129 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.402815410.1115/1.4028154 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.351905910.1149/1.3519059 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.280706810.1115/1.2807068 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.203242710.1149/1.2032427 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.304934710.1149/1.3049347 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.034 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.058112jes10.1149/2.058112jes ↗
24. Kehs M. A. Beeney M. D. Fathy H. K. , IEEE American Control Conference, OR(2014).
25. Fan G. Canova M. , in ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, OH (2015).
26. Chaturvedi N. A. Christensen J. F. Klein R. Kojic A. , in ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, CA (2013).
27. 10.1149/2.0471514jes10.1149/2.0471514jes ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.019 ↗
29. Fan G. Pan K. Canova M. , in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Osaka, Japan (2015).
30. 10.1149/1.187273710.1149/1.1872737 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.04310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.043 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.152651210.1149/1.1526512 ↗
33. 10.1002/er.165210.1002/er.1652 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.177521810.1149/1.1775218 ↗
35. 10.1149/1.356700710.1149/1.3567007 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.00810.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.008 ↗
37. 10.1149/2.0281412jes10.1149/2.0281412jes ↗
38. Smith G. D. , Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, Oxford University Press, (1986).