Operando Properties of Gas Diffusion Layers: Saturation and Liquid Permeability
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFC) require a sophisticated water management to operate efficiently, especially at high current densities which are needed to reach system cost targets. The description of the complicated two-phase water transport remains a challenge in PEFC models and requires experimental validation on various length scales. In this work, operando X-ray tomographic microscopy (XTM) with scan times of 10 s was used to depict the liquid water at defined conditions at a technically relevant cell temperature of 80°C. Cells with Toray TGP-H-060 gas diffusion layer (GDL) with microporous layer (MPL) and different rib width were operated with different feed gas humidifications (under- and oversaturated) and current densities between 0.75 to 3.0 A/cm 2 . Based on the quantification of the local and average saturation, the distribution of water cluster size is analyzed. Different categories of the water cluster connectivity are defined and quantified. The analysis is complemented with numerical simulations of the permeability in the liquid phase of the GDL that is correlated to saturation for the different GDL domains. The numerical simulations of the pressure drop of liquid water flow from the catalyst layer toward the gas channels in channel-rib repetition units allows for conclusions on cluster growth mechanisms.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Ene-farm installed 120,000 residential fuel cell units, 2015. https://fuelcellsworks.com/archives/2015/09/23/ene-farm-installed-120000-residential-fuel-cell-units/ Accessed 20th July 2016.
2. 10.4271/2015-01-117510.4271/2015-01-1175 ↗
3. Hyundai ix35 fuel cell, 2013. http://www.hyundainews.com/us/en/media/pressreleases/38232 Accessed 20th July 2016.
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.04310.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.043 ↗
5. 10.1149/2.0211514jes10.1149/2.0211514jes ↗
6. 10.1149/1.205619410.1149/1.2056194 ↗
7. Mathias M. F. Roth J. Fleming J. Lehnert W. , Diffusion media materials and characterisation. In Handbook of Fuel Cells. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010.10.1002/9780470974001.f303046 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.235621810.1149/1.2356218 ↗
9. 10.1149/2.017207jes10.1149/2.017207jes ↗
10. 10.1149/2.119306jes10.1149/2.119306jes ↗
11. 10.1149/1.278095510.1149/1.2780955 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.01.01810.1016/j.elecom.2008.01.018 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.080401jes10.1149/2.080401jes ↗
14. 10.1149/1.185033910.1149/1.1850339 ↗
15. 10.1039/b703485g10.1039/b703485g ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.029 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.06610.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.066 ↗
18. 10.2118/941152-G10.2118/941152-G ↗
19. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x ↗
20. 10.1002/aic.69039030410.1002/aic.690390304 ↗
21. Litster N. Djilali N. , Two-phase transport in porous gas diffusion electrodes. In Faghri M. Sundén B. , editors, Transport Phenomena in Fuel Cells, pages 175–214, Southhampton, UK, 2005. WIT Press.10.2495/1-85312-840-6/05 ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0321412jes10.1149/2.0321412jes ↗
23. 10.1149/1.304342210.1149/1.3043422 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.14010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.140 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.03210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.032 ↗
26. Development of in-situ X-ray imaging technologies for measuring water distribution in generating PEFC
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.12.01610.1016/j.electacta.2010.12.016 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.359655610.1149/1.3596556 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.042 ↗
30. Analysis of water distribution in a fuel cell using X-ray computed tomography
31. 10.1149/1.363557210.1149/1.3635572 ↗
32. 10.1149/2.005209jes10.1149/2.005209jes ↗
33. 10.1002/celc.20150013210.1002/celc.201500132 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.042208jes10.1149/2.042208jes ↗
35. 10.1107/S160057751302516210.1107/S1600577513025162 ↗
36. 10.1117/12.67949710.1117/12.679497 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.362529910.1063/1.3625299 ↗
38. Sage D. , Local Normalization. EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002.
39. 10.1149/05002.0477ecst10.1149/05002.0477ecst ↗
40. Eller J. , X-ray Tomographic Microscopy of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. PhD thesis, Nr. 20916, ETH Zurich, 2012.
41. 10.1021/jp405716910.1021/jp4057169 ↗
42. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA. 1984-2012.
43. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.07.03410.1016/j.electacta.2008.07.034 ↗
44. 10.1149/2.0401603jes10.1149/2.0401603jes ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.05810.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.058 ↗
46. 10.1149/1.219340310.1149/1.2193403 ↗
47. Flückiger R. , Transport Phenomena on the Channel-Rib Scale of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. PhD thesis, Nr. 18509, ETH Zurich, 2009.
48. 10.1002/adma.20150355710.1002/adma.201503557 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0271608jes10.1149/2.0271608jes ↗
50. 10.1149/2.0511609jes10.1149/2.0511609jes ↗
51. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)0048610.1016/S0378-7753(02)00486 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.08010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.080 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.073 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.08510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.085 ↗
55. 10.1149/06917.0523ecst10.1149/06917.0523ecst ↗