Modeling Crack Growth during Li Extraction in Storage Particles Using a Fracture Phase Field Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Storage particles of lithium ion batteries undergo significant mechanical stress during charging and discharging due to the inhomogeneous volume change within the particles when lithium is inserted and extracted. This stress potentially leads to fracture of the particles resulting in detrimental effects for the capacity and internal resistance of a lithium ion battery, such as the growth of additional solid electrolyte interface, loss of contact in conductive pathways or complete disintegration of the electrode. Here, we tackle the problem of fracture in storage particles by merging a coupled model of mechanical stress and diffusion of lithium ions with a phase field description of an evolving crack. This approach allows the simultaneous study of the evolution of the lithium concentration together with the growth of a crack without restrictions to specific geometries, simulation dimensions and presuppositions regarding the crack path. The model was successfully applied to study crack growth during lithium insertion in an earlier work. It was shown that inertia effects play a crucial role with respect to a possible fragmentation of the storage particles. Here, we focus on the opposite charging condition and examine the circumstances under which unstable crack growth and particle breakage can occur during lithium extraction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (97)
Show source-provided references
1. Roland Berger, Technology & Market Drivers for Stationary and Automotive Battery Systems (presented at BatteriesEvent2012), http://www.rechargebatteries.org/, accessed: 2013-11-12.
2. USABC, Goals for Advanced Batteries for EV’s, http://www.uscar.org/guest/article_view.php?articles_id=85, accessed: 2015-07-08.
3. 10.1149/2.013302jes10.1149/2.013302jes ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.10710.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.107 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.08110.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.081 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.049210jes10.1149/2.049210jes ↗
8. 10.1149/1.183698110.1149/1.1836981 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.03910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.039 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.351661910.1149/1.3516619 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.04610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.046 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.020 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.034 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.00810.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.074 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.06310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.063 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.06910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.069 ↗
19. Tranchot A. Etiemble A. Thivel P.-X. Idrissi H. Roué L. , “In-situ acoustic emission study of Si-based electrodes for Li-ion batteries,” J. Power Sources.
20. 10.1149/1.222084910.1149/1.2220849 ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-4596(81)90323-610.1016/0022-4596(81)90323-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.06.059 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.079 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.009 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.282674610.1149/1.2826746 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.218528710.1149/1.2185287 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.275984010.1149/1.2759840 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.02110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.021 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.300044210.1063/1.3000442 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.400596210.1115/1.4005962 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl202764f10.1021/nl202764f ↗
32. 10.1021/nn204177u10.1021/nn204177u ↗
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.01410.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.014 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.475470510.1063/1.4754705 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.02.02010.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.02.020 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.00110.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.001 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20080303810.1002/adma.200803038 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.01510.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.015 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.03510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.035 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.476791310.1063/1.4767913 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.06.01810.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.06.018 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.352599010.1063/1.3525990 ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04432.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04432.x ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.00110.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.01.00310.1016/j.jmps.2011.01.003 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.348651210.1063/1.3486512 ↗
47. 10.1149/1.346477310.1149/1.3464773 ↗
48. 10.1149/2.045204jes10.1149/2.045204jes ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.04.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.04.005 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.349261710.1063/1.3492617 ↗
51. 10.1149/2.026211jes10.1149/2.026211jes ↗
52. 10.1039/c2ee21874g10.1039/c2ee21874g ↗
53. 10.1149/2.104308jes10.1149/2.104308jes ↗
54. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
55. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
56. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-510.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
57. 10.1155/2013/84923110.1155/2013/849231 ↗
58. 10.1002/nme.286110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cma.2014.01.01610.1016/j.cma.2014.01.016 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cma.2012.01.00810.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008 ↗
61. 10.1007/s10704-012-9753-810.1007/s10704-012-9753-8 ↗
62. 10.1002/nme.438710.1002/nme.4387 ↗
63. 10.1002/pamm.20091007010.1002/pamm.200910070 ↗
64. 10.1007/s10704-010-9520-710.1007/s10704-010-9520-7 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.01610.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.016 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.06.01310.1016/j.jmps.2010.06.013 ↗
67. 10.1007/s10704-013-9881-910.1007/s10704-013-9881-9 ↗
68. 10.1002/adem.20130007310.1002/adem.201300073 ↗
69. Zuo P. Zhao Y.-P. , “A phase field model coupling lithium diffusion and stress evolution with crack propagation and application in lithium ion,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
70. 10.1063/1.490042610.1063/1.4900426 ↗
71. Klinsmann M. Rosato D. Kamlah M. McMeeking R. M. , “Modeling Crack Growth during Li insertion in Storage Particles using a Fracture Phase Field Approach,” Submitted (2015).10.1149/2.0281602jes ↗
72. 10.1149/2.011310jes10.1149/2.011310jes ↗
73. 10.1063/1.353073810.1063/1.3530738 ↗
74. Anderson T. L. , Fracture Mechanics, CRC Press, 1995.
75. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
76. Irwin G. R. , Fracture Dynamics, Fracturing of Metals 152.
77. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
78. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
79. 10.1002/cpa.316043080510.1002/cpa.3160430805 ↗
80. 10.1002/cpa.316042050310.1002/cpa.3160420503 ↗
81. 10.1007/s10659-007-9107-310.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.01110.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
83. Klinsmann M. Rosato D. Kamlah M. McMeeking R. M. , “Assessment of the Phase Field Formulation for Crack Growth,” Comput. Meth. Appl. M., accepted for publication (2015).10.1016/j.cma.2015.06.009 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.009 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.01110.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.04.01110.1016/j.jmps.2007.04.011 ↗
87. 10.1007/s10659-009-9189-110.1007/s10659-009-9189-1 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.02.00110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.02.001 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.06.00710.1016/j.jmps.2014.06.007 ↗
90. 10.1145/1268776.126877910.1145/1268776.1268779 ↗
91. 10.1145/2049673.204967810.1145/2049673.2049678 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.04410.1016/j.msea.2013.11.044 ↗
93. 10.1149/1.183613210.1149/1.1836132 ↗
94. Amanieu H. Y. , “Nanomechanics of Battery composites: from nanoindentation to AFM,” in: MSE 2014, Symposia D06, 2014.
95. 10.1016/0167-8442(87)90016-410.1016/0167-8442(87)90016-4 ↗
96. 10.1177/105678951038685210.1177/1056789510386852 ↗
97. 10.15625/0866-7136/31/3-4/565110.15625/0866-7136/31/3-4/5651 ↗