journal article·2014Open access

A Model for the Behavior of Battery Separators in Compression at Different Strain/Charge Rates

Gennady Y. Gor, John Cannarella, Jean H. Prévost, Craig B. Arnold

Abstract

During charge and discharge of a lithium battery, intercalation of lithium ions into the electrodes can cause their noticeable expansion, compressing the soft separator between them. To assess the role of these effects on the battery performance, it is necessary to know the response of the battery separator under compressive loading. Here we develop a model for predicting the elastic response of a commercial separator immersed in fluid to compression at different strain rates. We show that the response of the separator is determined by combination of viscoelastic behavior of the polymer skeleton and poroelastic behavior, due to the flow of the fluid in the pores. Poroelastic behavior causes effective stiffening of the separator, which increases with the strain rate. For a sample of ca. 1 cm in diameter these effects become pronounced at strain rates ≳ 10 − 3 s − 1 and have to be taken into account in coupled mechano-electrochemical models for lithium-ion batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.332791310.1149/1.3327913 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.02310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.023 ↗
4. 10.1149/2.084404jes10.1149/2.084404jes ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.09310.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.093 ↗
6. 10.1021/cr020738u10.1021/cr020738u ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.065 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.03610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.036 ↗
9. 10.1039/c4ra00983e10.1039/c4ra00983e ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.083 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.026 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11665-013-0743-410.1007/s11665-013-0743-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.16510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.165 ↗
14. Cannarella J. Liu X. Y. Leng C. Sinko P. Gor G. Y. Arnold C. B. , J. Electrochem. Soc., this issue (2014).
15. 10.1002/978047017276610.1002/9780470172766 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.171288610.1063/1.1712886 ↗
17. 10.1029/RG014i002p0022710.1029/RG014i002p00227 ↗
18. Coussy O. , Poromechanics (John Wiley & Sons, 2004).10.1002/0470092718 ↗
19. Prévost J. H. , DYNAFLOW: A Nonlinear Transient Finite Element Analysis Program. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. (last update 2014) (1981), URL http://blogs.princeton.edu/prevost/dynaflow/.
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.002 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.174983610.1063/1.1749836 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.172381210.1063/1.1723812 ↗
23. 10.1002/978111996712510.1002/9781119967125 ↗
24. 10.1680/geot.1953.3.7.28710.1680/geot.1953.3.7.287 ↗
25. Ebner M. Wood V. , personal communication (2014).
26. 10.1021/je020131a10.1021/je020131a ↗
27. 10.1021/je100353j10.1021/je100353j ↗
28. 10.1021/jp500063c10.1021/jp500063c ↗
29. Warfield R. Barnet F. R. , Tech. Rep., DTIC Document (1972).
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.08010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.080 ↗