Amorphous Columnar Silicon Anodes for Advanced High Voltage Lithium Ion Full Cells: Dominant Factors Governing Cycling Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of the electrolyte solution composition and the cycling protocol on the long-term cycling performance and surface chemistry of monolithic amorphous columnar silicon film electrodes was investigated using electrochemical tools, XPS, SEM and EDS. An excellent cycling stability of Si electrodes in fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC)-based electrolyte solutions was demonstrated. It relates to the ability of FEC to form polyenes, as well as to a high rate of HF formation in its water contaminated LiPF 6 solutions, measured by 19 F NMR spectroscopy. We found that excellent passivation in FEC solutions related to a low content of oxygen containing moieties in surface films. Galvanostatic tests and spectroscopic analyzes revealed also a strong dependence of the composition and properties of the surface films on amorphous Si electrodes on the cycling procedure. Repeated deep discharge of Si electrodes down to 10 mV vs. Li/Li + from the very beginning of the electrodes life ensures the formation of thin effective surface films on their surface and good cycling performance. Cycling stability of Si electrodes in LiPF 6 solutions decreases in the following order FEC/DMC > 3,4-trans-difluoroethylene carbonate (DFEC)/DMC > ethylene carbonate (EC)/DMC > propylene carbonate (PC).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.213269210.1149/1.2132692 ↗
2. 10.1149/1.212749510.1149/1.2127495 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.173921710.1149/1.1739217 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja108085d10.1021/ja108085d ↗
5. 10.1149/1.165242110.1149/1.1652421 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.007 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl203967r10.1021/nl203967r ↗
8. 10.1039/c2cc31712e10.1039/c2cc31712e ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.047 ↗
10. 10.1039/c2jm35125k10.1039/c2jm35125k ↗
11. 10.1021/jp305371v10.1021/jp305371v ↗
12. 10.1038/NANO.2012.3510.1038/NANO.2012.35 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20090038210.1002/smll.200900382 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00707-310.1016/S0378-7753(02)00707-3 ↗
15. 10.1149/1.216042910.1149/1.2160429 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.04910.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.049 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.358930010.1149/1.3589300 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2cc31712e10.1039/c2cc31712e ↗
19. 10.1021/cm301968b10.1021/cm301968b ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.03.04210.1016/j.ssi.2012.03.042 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.09510.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.095 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.066 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.029209jes10.1149/2.029209jes ↗
24. 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.04.01010.1016/j.elecom.2013.04.010 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.005308eel10.1149/2.005308eel ↗
26. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.02010.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.020 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp307372m10.1021/jp307372m ↗
28. 10.1021/i260040a01110.1021/i260040a011 ↗
29. 10.1149/1.186199410.1149/1.1861994 ↗
30. 10.1016/0013-4686(94)00221-510.1016/0013-4686(94)00221-5 ↗
31. 10.1149/1.204865910.1149/1.2048659 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.09.02710.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.09.027 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.11.01410.1016/j.elecom.2011.11.014 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.274656210.1149/1.2746562 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.08410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.084 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.245891310.1149/1.2458913 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.10610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.106 ↗
38. Ohtake M. Takimoto K. Nanbu N. Takehara M. Ue M. Sasaki Y. , 214th ECS Meeting, 2008, Abstract #175.10.1149/MA2008-02/1/175 ↗