journal article·2019-04

Mechanical comparison of new composite materials for aerospace applications

C. Barile, C. Casavola, F. De Cillis

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Composite materials are becoming the most useful material for aircraft structures. Their main advantage is connected to the possibility of deeply reducing weight and costs by maintaining high performances in terms of strength and security. The second major advantage in using this them depends on the possibility they could be proper designed to guarantee services they are made to. Many ways to combine them lead to the necessity of planning experimental tests in order to evaluate the real both elastic and plastic mechanical properties and to compare their variability as function of the fiber type, matrix type and manufacturing technology involved for realizing them. In this paper, a comparison between two innovative Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic materials was done. They differ, one from each other, for the matrix type (PEEK and BENZOXAZINE) and for the manufacturing process used to assemble the matrix with the reinforcement (Compression Molding and Resin Transfer Molding). On the other hand, the resin percentage weight content of both materials is maintained constant for all the tests: it is 42% for PEEK matrix and 64% for BENZOXAZINE matrix. The aim of the work is to critically analyze the results in order to get useful information for choosing the best one intended for designing and making the back section of fuselage of a regional aircraft. The component will consist of a front portion with structural aims (zoom phase) and a back part able to withstand to elevated temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Di Leif Carlsson A, Donald Adams F, Byron Pipes R. Experimental characterization of advanced composite materials, fourth ed..
2. Tong · 2002
3. Deformation behavior and strength of unidirectional carbon fiber laminates10.1007/s11029-006-0051-2 ↗
4. The influence of stitching and unconventional fibres orientation on the tensile properties of CFRP laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.033 ↗
5. Hybrid characterization of laminated wood with ESPI and optimization methods
6. Experimental and numerical investigation of tensile behavior of non-laminated CFRP straps10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.049 ↗
7. Cox · 1997
8. The impact resistance of composite materials-a review10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
9. A review of the effect of stitching on the in-plane mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00057-2 ↗
10. Natural fiber hybrid composites—a comparison between compression molding and resin transfer molding10.1002/pc.20706 ↗
11. 2017
12. 2011
13. SACMA SRM-1R-94 “compressive properties of oriented fiber-resin composites”.
14. A study on the failure behavior and mechanical properties of unidirectional fiber reinforced thermosetting and thermoplastic composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.005 ↗
15. The effects of unequal compressive/tensile moduli of composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.064 ↗
16. RFI composite materials behaviour
17. Effect of stitching on plain and open-hole strength of CFRP laminates10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60411-1 ↗