The Influence of Electric Field on Crossover in Redox-Flow Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Transport of active species through the ion-exchange membrane separating the electrodes in a redox-flow battery is an important source of inefficiency. Migration and electro-osmosis have significant impacts on the crossover of reactive anions, cations, and neutral species. In this paper, these phenomena are theoretically and experimentally explored for commercial cation-exchange membranes. The theoretical analysis indicates that plotting the cumulative Coulombic mismatch between charge and discharge as a function of time can be used to assess crossover rates. The relative importance of migration and electro-osmosis over diffusion is quantified and shown to increase with increasing current density and membrane thickness because the contributions of migration and electro-osmosis to ionic flux are independent of membrane thickness and proportional to current density, while diffusion is inversely proportional to membrane thickness and independent of current density.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/2.030202jes10.1149/2.030202jes ↗
2. 10.1039/C4EE02158D10.1039/C4EE02158D ↗
3. 10.1016/0378-7753(88)80005-310.1016/0378-7753(88)80005-3 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗
5. 10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
6. 10.1002/ente.20130010810.1002/ente.201300108 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.018211jes10.1149/2.018211jes ↗
8. Cho K. T. Tucker M. C. Ding M. Ridgway P. Battaglia V. S. Srinivasan V. Weber A. Z. , ChemPlusChem, in press (2014).
9. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.02110.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.026 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.051208jes10.1149/2.051208jes ↗
12. 10.1149/2.001305eel10.1149/2.001305eel ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0941409jes10.1149/2.0941409jes ↗
14. 10.1149/05307.0007ecst10.1149/05307.0007ecst ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.003 ↗
16. 10.1149/2.017209jes10.1149/2.017209jes ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.041 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.05.00810.1016/j.ssi.2013.05.008 ↗
19. 10.1149/1.212971010.1149/1.2129710 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.212898410.1149/1.2128984 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00309-010.1016/S0376-7388(03)00309-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.00310.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00307-410.1016/S0376-7388(97)00307-4 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00308-610.1016/S0376-7388(97)00308-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.066 ↗
27. Sing D. C. , in M. Sc. Thesis University of Texas at Austin, p. 70 (2013).
28. 10.1007/s10800-014-0772-110.1007/s10800-014-0772-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.12810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.128 ↗
30. Newman J. Thomas-Alyea K. E. , Electrochemical Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey (2004).
31. 10.1002/aic.69046061010.1002/aic.690460610 ↗
32. 10.1021/i100014a01710.1021/i100014a017 ↗
33. 10.1021/i100014a01610.1021/i100014a016 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.00610.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.006 ↗
35. 10.1002/fuce.20080004410.1002/fuce.200800044 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.297796010.1149/1.2977960 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.163915710.1149/1.1639157 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.369745110.1149/1.3697451 ↗
39. 10.1016/0013-4686(94)00277-810.1016/0013-4686(94)00277-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00132-710.1016/S0013-4686(98)00132-7 ↗
41. 10.1149/1.182759910.1149/1.1827599 ↗
42. 10.1149/1.208661510.1149/1.2086615 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.01.04610.1016/j.polymer.2012.01.046 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00368-X10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00368-X ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.01910.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.019 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.04610.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.046 ↗