journal article·2018Open access

Resolving the Discrepancy in Tortuosity Factor Estimation for Li-Ion Battery Electrodes through Micro-Macro Modeling and Experiment

Francois L. E. Usseglio-Viretta, Andrew Colclasure, Aashutosh N. Mistry, Koffi Pierre Yao Claver, Fezzeh Pouraghajan, Donal P. Finegan, Thomas M. M. Heenan, Daniel Abraham, Partha P. Mukherjee, Dean Wheeler, Paul Shearing, Samuel J. Cooper, Kandler Smith

Abstract

Battery performance is strongly correlated with electrode microstructural properties. Of the relevant properties, the tortuosity factor of the electrolyte transport paths through microstructure pores is important as it limits battery maximum charge/discharge rate, particularly for energy-dense thick electrodes. Tortuosity factor however, is difficult to precisely measure, and thus its estimation has been debated frequently in the literature. Herein, three independent approaches have been applied to quantify the tortuosity factor of lithium-ion battery electrodes. The first approach is a microstructure model based on three-dimensional geometries from X-ray computed tomography (CT) and stochastic reconstructions enhanced with computationally generated carbon/binder domain (CBD), as CT is often unable to resolve the CBD. The second approach uses a macro-homogeneous model to fit electrochemical data at several rates, providing a separate estimation of the tortuosity factor. The third approach experimentally measures tortuosity factor via symmetric cells employing a blocking electrolyte. Comparisons have been made across the three approaches for 14 graphite and nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide electrodes. Analysis suggests that if the tortuosity factor were characterized based on the active material skeleton only, the actual tortuosities would be 1.35–1.81 times higher for calendered electrodes. Correlations are provided for varying porosity, CBD phase interfacial arrangement and solid particle morphology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/1.345987810.1149/1.3459878 ↗
2. 10.1021/jp208428w10.1021/jp208428w ↗
3. 10.1149/1.297603110.1149/1.2976031 ↗
4. 10.1149/2.024203jes10.1149/2.024203jes ↗
5. 10.1115/1.403519810.1115/1.4035198 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.7b1777110.1021/acsami.7b17771 ↗
7. 10.1149/1.359761410.1149/1.3597614 ↗
8. 10.1109/CCA.2008.462958910.1109/CCA.2008.4629589 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.01510.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.038 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.278377210.1149/1.2783772 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.293921110.1149/1.2939211 ↗
14. 10.1149/2.0501711jes10.1149/2.0501711jes ↗
15. 10.1149/1.242526910.1149/1.2425269 ↗
16. 10.1002/aic.69021010310.1002/aic.690210103 ↗
17. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-810.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-8 ↗
18. Newman J. Thomas-Alyea K. E. , in Electrochemical Systems, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons (2004).
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.055 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.079 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.09310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.093 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.14310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.143 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.0401507jes10.1149/2.0401507jes ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.16110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.161 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20130127810.1002/aenm.201301278 ↗
27. Kozeny · Wien · 1927 · 136 · 271
28. Carman P. C. , in Flow of Gases through Porous Media, London, Butterworths Scientific Publications (1956).
29. 10.1149/2.jes11322410.1149/2.jes113224 ↗
30. 10.1088/0965-0393/21/7/07400910.1088/0965-0393/21/7/074009 ↗
31. 10.1002/andp.1935416070510.1002/andp.19354160705 ↗
32. Archie G. E. , Dallas Meeting (1941).
33. 10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.00610.1016/j.coche.2016.02.006 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.1141607jes10.1149/2.1141607jes ↗
35. 10.1007/s10853-012-6968-z10.1007/s10853-012-6968-z ↗
36. 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85053-510.1016/0009-2509(89)85053-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.070 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.105 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.03210.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.032 ↗
40. 10.1149/1.183692110.1149/1.1836921 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.15610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.156 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.079112jes10.1149/2.079112jes ↗
43. 10.3390/en8121240610.3390/en81212406 ↗
44. 10.2136/sssaj2012.043510.2136/sssaj2012.0435 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.04110.1016/j.ces.2007.03.041 ↗
46. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.9710.1038/nenergy.2016.97 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.11.02410.1016/j.ssi.2017.11.024 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.05810.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.058 ↗
49. 10.1002/aic.1409410.1002/aic.14094 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.090 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.13410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.134 ↗
52. 10.1149/2.024210jes10.1149/2.024210jes ↗
53. 10.1002/aenm.20120093210.1002/aenm.201200932 ↗
54. 10.1149/2.0311802jes10.1149/2.0311802jes ↗
55. 10.1149/07711.1095ecst10.1149/07711.1095ecst ↗
56. 10.1002/aenm.20160223910.1002/aenm.201602239 ↗
57. 10.1149/2.002203esl10.1149/2.002203esl ↗
58. 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.11.00610.1016/j.elecom.2012.11.006 ↗
59. 10.1111/jmi.1202110.1111/jmi.12021 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.11910.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.119 ↗
61. 10.1149/1.183613210.1149/1.1836132 ↗
62. 10.1149/2.013408jes10.1149/2.013408jes ↗
63. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.22010.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.220 ↗
64. Feinauer J. Hein S. Rave S. Schmidt S. Westhoff D. Zausch J. Iliev O. Latz A. Ohlberger M. Schmidt V. , arXiv:1704.04139 [math.NA] (2017).
65. 10.1002/aenm.20140161210.1002/aenm.201401612 ↗
66. 10.1002/aenm.20130161710.1002/aenm.201301617 ↗
67. Pouraghajan F. Knight H. Mazzeo B. A. Wheeler D. R. , ECS Meeting abstracts (2017).
68. 10.1111/jmi.1257710.1111/jmi.12577 ↗
69. 10.5201/ipol.2011.bcm_nlm10.5201/ipol.2011.bcm_nlm ↗
70. 10.1109/ISBI.2008.454125010.1109/ISBI.2008.4541250 ↗
71. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
72. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
73. 10.1149/2.079112jes10.1149/2.079112jes ↗
74. Battery microstructure library and characterization tools, open source data library: https://www.nrel.gov/transportation/microstructure.html.
75. 10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.00210.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002 ↗
76. 10.1149/06801.1857ecst10.1149/06801.1857ecst ↗
77. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.15210.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.152 ↗
78. 10.11588/ans.2015.100.2055310.11588/ans.2015.100.20553 ↗
79. 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-410.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
80. 10.1039/C7SE00498B10.1039/C7SE00498B ↗
81. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-12395710.1146/annurev-matsci-070616-123957 ↗
82. 10.1149/2.0261707jes10.1149/2.0261707jes ↗
83. 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.12.02110.1016/j.elecom.2012.12.021 ↗
84. 10.1149/06918.0081ecst10.1149/06918.0081ecst ↗
85. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.16110.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.161 ↗
86. 10.1149/2.1271707jes10.1149/2.1271707jes ↗
87. 10.1039/C6CP08897J10.1039/C6CP08897J ↗
88. 10.1021/la503846910.1021/la5038469 ↗
89. 10.1149/2.026408jes10.1149/2.026408jes ↗
90. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.11710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.117 ↗
91. 10.1149/2.033207jes10.1149/2.033207jes ↗
92. Israelachvili J. , in Intermolecular and Surface Forces, Revised 3rd edition, Academic Press (2011).10.1016/B978-0-12-391927-4.10001-5 ↗
93. 10.1149/2.0571706jes10.1149/2.0571706jes ↗
94. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.13210.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.132 ↗
95. 10.1021/acsami.6b1208510.1021/acsami.6b12085 ↗
96. 10.1149/1.187273710.1149/1.1872737 ↗
97. 10.1149/2.1701713jes10.1149/2.1701713jes ↗
98. Geodict. (http://www.geodict.com/).
99. Wiegmann A. , in “GEODICT: virtual microstructure simulator and material property predictor ( http://www.geodict.com/)” (2016).
100. 10.1149/2.0231803jes10.1149/2.0231803jes ↗