journal article·2012

Separation of Charge Transfer and Contact Resistance in LiFePO4-Cathodes by Impedance Modeling

J. Illig, M. Ender, T. Chrobak, J. P. Schmidt, D. Klotz, E. Ivers-Tiffée

Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium iron phosphate is a promising candidate material for Li-Ion batteries. In this study, the rate determining processes are assessed in more detail in order to separate performance limiting factors. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of experimental LiFePO 4 /Lithium-cells are deconvoluted by the method of distribution of relaxation times (DRT), what necessitates a pre-processing of the capacitive branch. This results in a separation into cathode and anode polarization processes and in a proposition of a physically motivated equivalent circuit model. We identify three different polarization processes of the LiFePO 4 -cathode (i) solid state diffusion, (ii) charge transfer (cathode/electrolyte) and (iii) contact resistance (cathode/current collector). Our model is then applied to EIS data sets covering varied temperature (0° to 30°C) and state of charge (10% to 100%). Activation energy, polarization resistance and frequency range are determined separately for all cathode processes involved. Finally, the tape-casted LiFePO 4 –cathode sheet is modified in porosity, thickness and contact area between cathode/electrolyte and cathode/current collector by a calendering process. Charge transfer resistance and contact resistance respond readily in polarization and relaxation frequency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::AID-ADMA725>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199807)10:10<725::AID-ADMA725>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
2. 10.1149/1.183757110.1149/1.1837571 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00064-410.1016/S0167-2738(02)00064-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01013-810.1016/S0378-7753(01)01013-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.02410.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.024 ↗
6. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.02210.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.022 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.238824010.1149/1.2388240 ↗
9. 10.1149/1.240976810.1149/1.2409768 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.06.02810.1016/j.ssi.2008.06.028 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.296422010.1149/1.2964220 ↗
12. 10.1149/1.150696210.1149/1.1506962 ↗
13. Macdonald J. R. , Impedance Spectroscopy, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1987).
14. 10.1023/A:102059952516010.1023/A:1020599525160 ↗
15. 10.1149/1.290886010.1149/1.2908860 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.280137210.1149/1.2801372 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.350545610.1149/1.3505456 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.356486510.1149/1.3564865 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.12110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.121 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.204421010.1149/1.2044210 ↗
21. Tikhonov A. N. Goncharsky Stepanov Yagola , Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London (1990).
22. 10.1016/0010-4655(92)90132-I10.1016/0010-4655(92)90132-I ↗
23. 10.1021/jp970190910.1021/jp9701909 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.139316210.1149/1.1393162 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp951427910.1021/jp9514279 ↗
26. 10.1021/cm062246u10.1021/cm062246u ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.007 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00134-010.1016/S0167-2738(02)00134-0 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.00410.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.004 ↗