Role of apatite-type lanthanoid silicate promoter in PdO/Ln10Si6O27/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for catalytic combustion-type methane sensor: Contrasting trends between oxide-ion conductivity and sensor performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Apatite-type lanthanoid silicates (Ln 10 Si 6 O 27 ; Ln = La, Pr, Sm, Eu, Gd) were investigated as promoters for PdO/-Al 2 O 3 catalysts to enhance the performance of catalytic combustion-type methane sensors.X-ray diffraction and fluorescence analyses confirmed successful synthesis of phase-pure Ln 10 Si 6 O 27 and PdO/Ln 10 Si 6 O 27 /-Al 2 O 3 catalysts with compositions close to the intended stoichiometry.All sensors exhibited fast responses (T 50 10 s) and excellent linearity (R 2 > 0.990) in the range of 0-1000 ppm CH 4 .Remarkably, the PdO/Gd 10 Si 6 O 27 /-Al 2 O 3 sensor enabled quantitative CH 4 detection at 320 C, the lowest operating temperature among the tested catalysts.Interestingly, sensor sensitivity increased systematically with increasing lanthanoid atomic number, opposite to the trend expected from the oxide-ion conductivity of Ln 10 Si 6 O 27 , which decreases from La to Gd. Detailed analyses revealed that this discrepancy originated from catalytic activity and oxygen release properties rather than bulk conductivity.H 2 -TPR results demonstrated that PdO/Gd 10 Si 6 O 27 /-Al 2 O 3 released active oxygen species more readily at low temperatures than the La-based catalyst.XPS further showed that the Pd 2+ /Pd 0 ratio decreased from La to Gd, with the Gd-based catalyst achieving a balanced distribution that facilitated continuous redox cycling and sustained oxygen supply.This optimized Pd redox environment enhanced the proportion of complete methane oxidation, resulting in higher combustion heat and improved sensor output.These findings highlight that the performance of catalytic combustion-type methane sensors is governed not by intrinsic oxide-ion conductivity of the promoter, but by promoter-PdO interactions controlling Pd redox states and oxygen release dynamics.The results provide new insights into the design of advanced methane sensors operating at lower temperatures with higher sensitivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Osaka
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) T. Wen, M. Liu, J. Woda, G. Zheng and S. L. Brantley, Water Res. 200, 117236 (2021).10.1016/j.watres.2021.117236 ↗
2. 2) N. Kumar and H. Gupta, Methane: Risk assessment, environmental, and health hazard, in “Hazardous Gases”, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2021) pp. 225–238.10.1016/B978-0-323-89857-7.00009-8 ↗
3. 3) M. E. Gallagher, A. Down, R. C. Ackley, K. Zhao, N. Phillips and R. B. Jackson, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let. 2, 286 (2015).10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00213 ↗
4. 4) R. W. Howarth, Energy Emission Control Technol. 2015, 45 (2015).10.2147/EECT.S61539 ↗
5. 5) Y. Tang, Y. Zhao and H. Liu, ACS Sensors 7, 3582 (2022).10.1021/acssensors.2c01142 ↗
6. 6) M. V. Nikolic, V. M. Milovanovic, Z. Z. Vasiljevic and Z. Stamenkovic, Sensors-Basel 20, 6694 (2020).10.3390/s20226694 ↗
7. 7) S. Uma and M. K. Shobana, Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys. 349, 114044 (2023).10.1016/j.sna.2022.114044 ↗
8. 8) J. Wawrzyniak, Sensors-Basel 23, 9548 (2023).10.3390/s23239548 ↗
9. 9) S. Arunbalaji, M. A. M. Ismail, M. Arivanandhan, A. Alsalme, A. Alghamdi and R. Jayavel, B. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 93, 1564 (2020).10.1246/bcsj.20200195 ↗
10. 10) R. Ranga, P. Kumari, N. Kumar and S. K. Sahoo, Mater. Charact. 178, 111269 (2021).10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111269 ↗
11. 11) P. Rodlamul, S. Tamura and N. Imanaka, B. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 92, 585 (2019).10.1246/bcsj.20180284 ↗
12. 12) I. Ivanov, A. M. Baranov, D. N. Spirjakin, S. Akbari, S. M. Mironov, H. Karami and G. B. Gharehpetian, Measurement 194, 111103 (2022).10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111103 ↗
13. 13) I. A. Kalinin, I. V. Roslyakov, D. Bograchev, S. E. Kushnir, I. I. Ivanov, A. V. Dyakov and K. S. Napolskii, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem. 404, 135270 (2024).10.1016/j.snb.2023.135270 ↗
14. 14) S. Peng, Z. Ma, J. Ma, H. Wang, J. Chen, H. Wei, Y. Li, Z. Ao and B. Wang, Front Chem. 10, 978698 (2022).10.3389/fchem.2022.1085035 ↗
15. 15) T. Delrieux, S. Sharma, F. Maurer, J. Czechowsky, C. N. Borca, D. Karpov, C. Cárdenas, P. Lott, M. Casapu, T. L. Sheppard and J. D. Grunwaldt, ACS Catal. 15, 13470 (2025).10.1021/acscatal.5c02678 ↗
16. 16) K. Murata, J. Ohyama, Y. Yamamoto, S. Arai and A. Satsuma, ACS Catal. 10, 8149 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c02050 ↗
17. 17) S. Nakayama and M. Sakamoto, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18, 1413 (1998).10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00032-6 ↗
18. 18) E. Kendrick, M. S. Islam and P. R. Slater, J. Mater. Chem. 17, 3104 (2007).10.1039/b704426g ↗
19. 19) K. Ueda, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 120, 74 (2012).10.2109/jcersj2.120.560 ↗
20. 20) S. Shinde, S. Pitale, S. G. Singh, M. Ghosh, B. Tiwari, S. Sen, S. C. Gadkari and S. K. Gupta, J. Alloy. Compd. 592, 12 (2014).10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.160 ↗
21. 21) V. Jary, M. Nikl, S. Kurosawa, Y. Shoji, E. Mihokova, A. Beitlerova, G. P. Pazzi and A. Yoshikawa, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 26521 (2014).10.1021/jp5080384 ↗
22. 22) N. P. Bansal, G. Costa, W. D. Jennings and A. Garg, Ceram. Int. 49, 29948 (2023).10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.252 ↗
23. 23) W. Lee, S. Tamura and N. Imanaka, IEEJ T. Electr. Electr., in press (2025).
24. 24) W. Lee, S. Tamura and N. Imanaka, Chem. Lett. 54, upaf177 (2025).
25. 25) R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751 (1976).10.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
26. 26) A. T. Petit and P. L. Dulong, Ann. Chim. Phys. 10, 395 (1819).
27. 27) Y. Nitta, Y. Ichikawa, K. Hirata and Y. Yamasaki, J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 54, 765 (2019).10.5988/jime.54.765 ↗
28. 28) J. Lin, J. Huang, X. Chen, Y. Zheng, Y. Xiao, Y. Zheng and L. Jiang, Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 340, 123283 (2024).10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123283 ↗
29. 29) J. Lee, T. H. Lim, E. Lee and D. H. Kim, ChemCatChem 13, 3706 (2021).10.1002/cctc.202100653 ↗
30. 30) Y. Cui, J. Zhu Chen, B. Peng, L. Kovarik, A. Devaraj, Z. Li, T. Ma, Y. Wang, J. Szanyi, J. T. Miller, Y. Wang and F. Gao, JACS Au 1, 396 (2021).10.1021/jacsau.0c00109 ↗
31. 31) J. Murata, S. Tamura, Y. Yamamoto, S. Arai and A. Satsuma, ACS Catal. 10, 8149 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c02050 ↗
32. 32) S. Yue, C. S. Praveen, A. Klyushin, A. Fedorov, M. Hashimoto, Q. Li, T. Jones, P. Liu, W. Yu, M. Willinger and X. Huang, Nat. Commun. 15, 4678 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-49134-y ↗
33. 33) V. Muravev, J. F. Simons, A. Parastaev, M. A. Verheijen, J. J. Struijs, N. Kosinov and E. J. Hensen, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 61, e202200434 (2022).10.1002/anie.202200434 ↗
34. 34) Y. Semba, N. Ohta, F. Paulus, M. Ohata and Y. Nakao, Chem.-Eur. J. 27, 5035 (2024).10.1002/chem.202100075 ↗
35. 35) K. S. Yoo, C. H. Yoon and K. W. Jung, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16384 (2006).10.1021/ja063710z ↗
36. 36) B. Chen, J. Lin, X. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Xu, Z. Wang and Y. Zheng, ACS Omega 4, 18582 (2019).10.1021/acsomega.9b02370 ↗
37. 37) W. Qi, Z. Huang, Z. Chen, L. Fu and Z. Zhang, RSC Adv. 9, 11385 (2019).10.1039/C9RA00735K ↗
38. 38) H. Stotz, L. Maier, A. Boubnov, A. T. Gremminger, J. D. Grunwaldt and O. Deutschmann, J. Catal. 370, 152 (2019).10.1016/j.jcat.2018.12.007 ↗
39. 39) X. Wang, Y. Liu, W. Ge, Y. Xu, H. Jia and Q. Li, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11, 110712 (2023).10.1016/j.jece.2023.110712 ↗