Rehabilitation of RC inverted-T girders using anchored CFRP sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Existing infrastructure includes significant number of reinforced concrete (RC) bridges that are old and designed based on outdated design codes. Inverted-T beams used as bentcap girders that support the bridge’s longitudinal precast beams provided a popular structural system of many existing bridges. The structural behaviour of inverted-T beam is different than that of conventional top-loaded beams, due to the fact that the loads are introduced into the bottom flange rather than the top of the beam. The objective of the present study is to experimentally examine the effectiveness of new rehabilitation techniques using anchored carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets to eliminate non-ductile failure mechanisms in hanger, web, and flange zones of RC inverted-T girders. The experimental program of this study included conducting eight tests on four simply supported RC inverted-T girders before and after rehabilitation. The girders represent a 1/3rd scale model of a prototype bentcap girder. The experimental results showed that the proposed new rehabilitation schemes proved to eliminate the non-ductile mechanisms in hanger, web, and flange zones. The rehabilitated girders were able to reach displacement ductility levels of up to 4 and showed an increase in strength up to 20% compared to the control girders.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 1977
2. ACI Manual of Concrete Practice. Structural design. Specifications, structural analysis, Part-2; 1968.
3. ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318-83). Detroit, Michigan: American Concrete Institute; 1983. p. 111.
4. ACI Committee 440. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures (ACI 440.2R-02). Farmington Hills, Mich.: American Concrete Institute; 2002. p. 45.
5. ASTM. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber-resin composites. D3039-76. West Conshohocken, PA; 1989.
6. Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction—state-of-the-art review10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
7. Bentz E. Response-2000 program. www.ecf.utoronto.ca/bentz/r2k.htm [accessed May 2006].
8. CSA. Code for design of concrete structures for buildings, CAN3-A23.3-M77. Rexdale, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Standard Association; 1977. p. 131.
9. FIB bulletin No. 14. Externally bonded FRP requirement for RC structures. Technical Report, Fédération International du Béton, France; 2001.
10. Fyfe. www.fyfeco.com [accessed September 2005].
11. ISIS Canada. Strengthening reinforced concrete structures with externally-bonded fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs). University of Manitoba; 2001.
12. Experimental investigation of nonconventional confinement for concrete using FRP10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(480) ↗
13. Serviceability behavior and failure mechanisms of concrete inverted T-beam bridge bentcaps
14. Design of reinforced and prestressed concrete inverted T beams for bridge structures10.15554/pcij.07011985.112.136 ↗
15. Concrete structural health monitoring using embedded piezoceramic transducers10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/003 ↗
16. Zhu RH, Dhonde H, Hsu TC. Diagonal crack control for ledges in inverted T bent caps. Report 1854-5 to TxDOT. Texas: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston; 2003.
17. Crack width prediction using compatibility-aided strut-and-tie model
18. Zhu RH, Hsu TC. Crack width prediction for ledges in inverted T bent caps. ACI SP-225-12; 2005. p. 179–96.