In Situ SiC Nanowire Bridging Enables Structural Reconstruction of Macropore Defects in CMC
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT SiC f /SiC has shown great potential for high‐temperature structural applications such as aero‐engine components, but repeated precursor infiltration and pyrolysis (PIP) often leave large interconnected macropores due to precursor loss and fiber architecture constraints. These defects promote stress concentration and oxidation, degrading structural reliability. To address this, SiC nanowires (SiCnws) were in situ introduced into difficult‐to‐fill macropores, forming a three‐dimensional bridging network. The observed nanowire morphology was consistent with a catalyst‐assisted vapor‐liquid‐solid‐type growth process, and the morphology and distribution of SiCnws were regulated by varying the ferrocene/PCS/xylene ratio. The resulting interconnected network enhanced load transfer and inhibited crack propagation through bridging and deflection. Consequently, porosity decreased from 26.9% to 12.9%, density increased from 2.137 to 2.429 g/cm 3 , and fracture behavior shifted from brittle to pseudo‐plastic. This approach offers an effective strategy for repairing structural defects in ceramic matrix composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials Science and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing People's Republic of China
College of Energy and Power Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compind.2024.10409910.1016/j.compind.2024.104099 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20180240410.1002/adma.201802404 ↗
3. 10.3390/app1305301710.3390/app13053017 ↗
4. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1058.17010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1058.170 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11857710.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118577 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.07.03810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.07.038 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.05110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.051 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.05010.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.050 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.05410.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.054 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.029 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.04810.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.048 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11665‐022‐07419‐710.1007/s11665‐022‐07419‐7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.11610.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.116 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.025 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40145‐022‐0611‐510.1007/s40145‐022‐0611‐5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10712910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107129 ↗
18. 10.1080/09276440.2022.210979510.1080/09276440.2022.2109795 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1523852110.3390/ma15238521 ↗
20. 10.1080/00218464.2016.119659010.1080/00218464.2016.1196590 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.09.01510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.09.015 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.09.26110.1016/j.ceramint.2025.09.261 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.25110.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.251 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.032 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.04810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.048 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20050010410.1002/adma.200500104 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.13510.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.135 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2025.11766310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2025.117663 ↗