journal article·2014-02

Revealing magnetic domain structure in functional Fe2.5Zn0.5O4 wires by transmission electron microscopy

Y. Murakami, A. Ohta, A.N. Hattori, T. Kanki, S. Aizawa, T. Tanigaki, H.S. Park, H. Tanaka, D. Shindo

Acta Materialia· Volume 64
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The magnetic and crystallographic microstructures in Fe 2.5 Zn 0.5 O 4 (FZO) wires fabricated using nano-imprint lithography, pulsed laser deposition and a molybdenum lift-off mask technique were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A process using a focused ion beam completely separated the FZO wires from the insulating MgO substrate, and accordingly allowed in-depth TEM studies of the domain structures. Observations using energy-filtered TEM demonstrated good crystallinity of the FZO wires. Both Lorentz microscopy and electron holography studies revealed unexpectedly small magnetic domains (∼100 nm or smaller) due to a significant interaction with antiphase boundaries. The role of antiphase boundaries on the functionalities observed in the constrained wires (e.g., nonlinear I – V characteristics and large magnetoresistance) is discussed on the basis of these microscopic observations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Walz · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2002 · 14 · R285
2. Senn · Nature · 2012 · 481 · 17310.1038/nature10704 ↗
3. Lee · Nat Mater · 2012 · 7 · 13010.1038/nmat2084 ↗
4. Dedkov · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 06441710.1103/PhysRevB.65.064417 ↗
5. Reisinger · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 498010.1063/1.1808497 ↗
6. Ishikawa · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 86 · 22250410.1063/1.1942640 ↗
7. Takaobushi · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 24250710.1063/1.2405389 ↗
8. Takaobushi · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 20510810.1103/PhysRevB.76.205108 ↗
9. Goto · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 196210.1021/nl900158t ↗
10. Goto · Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 277210.1021/nl100542a ↗
11. Tonomura · 1999
12. Shindo · J Phys D · 2008 · 41 · 18300210.1088/0022-3727/41/18/183002 ↗
13. Cha · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 18530610.1088/0957-4484/22/18/185306 ↗
14. Sakamoto · J Appl Phys · 2013 · 113 · 10430210.1063/1.4794810 ↗
15. Murakami · Philos Mag Lett · 2001 · 81 · 63110.1080/09500830110063950 ↗
16. De Graef · 2001
17. Celetto · Eur Phys J B · 2003 · 36 · 27110.1140/epjb/e2003-00344-7 ↗
18. Bobo · Eur Phys J B · 2001 · 24 · 4310.1007/s100510170020 ↗
19. Margulies · Phys Rev Lett · 1997 · 79 · 516210.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5162 ↗
20. Kasama · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 10443210.1103/PhysRevB.73.104432 ↗
21. Parkinson · Phys Rev B · 2012 · 85 · 19545010.1103/PhysRevB.85.195450 ↗
22. Wei · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 12251710.1063/1.2356308 ↗
23. Lee · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 16250210.1063/1.3502606 ↗
24. Paganin · Phys Rev Lett · 1998 · 80 · 258610.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2586 ↗
25. Kasama · Phase Trans · 2013 · 86 · 6710.1080/01411594.2012.695373 ↗
26. Sofin · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 13443610.1103/PhysRevB.83.134436 ↗
27. Voogt · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 57 · R810710.1103/PhysRevB.57.R8107 ↗
28. Arora · J Magn Magn Mater · 2005 · 286 · 46310.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.066 ↗
29. Ramos · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 100 · 10390210.1063/1.2386927 ↗
30. Wu · Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 113210.1021/nl902973p ↗
31. Bruno · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 83 · 242510.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2425 ↗
32. Tatara · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 83 · 203010.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2030 ↗
33. Versluijs · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 02660110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.026601 ↗
34. Xu · Geophys Res Lett · 1996 · 23 · 281910.1029/96GL01568 ↗
35. Rybchenko · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 05442410.1103/PhysRevB.72.054424 ↗
36. Margulies · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 53 · 917510.1103/PhysRevB.53.9175 ↗
37. Berger · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 91 · 763410.1063/1.1456404 ↗