Evaluation of the change in properties caused by axial and radial temperature gradients in silicon carbide crystal growth using the physical vapor transport method
Source abstract
Abstract
In the process of growing single-crystal silicon carbide (SiC) using the physical vapor transport method, the most sensitive and important factor is temperature. The occurrence of a temperature gradient inside the growth cell acts as a driving force for SiC crystal growth. Temperature gradients are also a significant parameter for determining both the growth rate and the quality of the resultant crystal. In addition to the overall temperature gradient in the growth cell, axial and radial temperature gradients can appear within the SiC crystal ingot. We analyzed changes in thermal stresses caused by these temperature gradients according to their location within the SiC crystal ingot. Using simulation and nanobeam diffraction analysis, we confirmed that thermal stresses, including tensile and compressive stresses, differed in accordance with their location inside of the SiC ingot. In particular, large compressive stresses were observed near the edge of the wafer that was sliced close to the SiC ingot growth interface. We also analyzed the effect of the location within the SiC ingot on crystallinity and the occurrence of defects as a function of thermal stress. We confirmed that lower crystallinity and higher dislocation density not only reduce the SiC bandgap, but also increase the resistivity and diminish the electrical properties of SiC. 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao · Mater Res Soc Bull · 2005 · 30 · 29310.1557/mrs2005.76 ↗
2. Zolper · Mater Res Soc Bull · 2005 · 30 · 27310.1557/mrs2005.73 ↗
3. Ching · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2006 · 422 · 14710.1016/j.msea.2006.01.007 ↗
4. Tairov · J Cryst Growth · 1978 · 43 · 20910.1016/0022-0248(78)90169-0 ↗
5. Kordina · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 145610.1063/1.117613 ↗
6. Hofmann · Mater Sci Eng, B · 1999 · 61 · 2910.1016/S0921-5107(98)00440-1 ↗
7. Ma · J Cryst Growth · 2003 · 258 · 31810.1016/S0022-0248(03)01540-9 ↗
8. Anikin · Mater Sci Eng, B · 1997 · 46 · 27810.1016/S0921-5107(96)01993-9 ↗
9. Hofmann · J Cryst Growth · 1999 · 198 · 100510.1016/S0022-0248(98)01212-3 ↗
10. Kim · Ceram Int · 2014 · 40 · 395310.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.041 ↗
11. Ma · Cryst Growth Des · 2002 · 2 · 21310.1021/cg015572p ↗
12. Kingery · J Am Ceram Soc · 1995 · 38 · 310.1111/j.1151-2916.1955.tb14545.x ↗
13. Nguyen · Solid State Technol · 2006 · 49 · 41
14. Liu · Mater Sci Eng, R · 2002 · 37 · 6110.1016/S0927-796X(02)00008-6 ↗
15. Chierchia · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 93 · 891810.1063/1.1571217 ↗
16. Katsuno · J Cryst Growth · 2000 · 216 · 25610.1016/S0022-0248(00)00445-0 ↗
17. Lin · Diam Relat Mater · 2011 · 20 · 51610.1016/j.diamond.2011.02.011 ↗
18. Bechelany · Adv Funct Mater · 2007 · 17 · 93910.1002/adfm.200600816 ↗
19. Selder · J Cryst Growth · 2000 · 211 · 33310.1016/S0022-0248(99)00853-2 ↗
20. Muller · J Cryst Growth · 2000 · 211 · 32510.1016/S0022-0248(99)00835-0 ↗
21. Casady · Solid State Electron · 1996 · 39 · 140910.1016/0038-1101(96)00045-7 ↗
22. Ishikawa · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 82 · 204410.1063/1.1564868 ↗
23. Shiri · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 07311410.1063/1.2973208 ↗