journal article·2008-02

Enhancement of deformation of Ni–Mn–Ga martensite by dynamic loading

V.A. L’vov, S. Kustov, E. Cesari

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The process of deformation of twinned ferromagnetic martensite under a combined action of slowly increasing magnetic field (or mechanical stress) and oscillatory mechanical stress has been studied theoretically in the framework of a statistical model of magnetically/mechanically induced deformation. The dependencies of magnetically/mechanically induced deformation on time, oscillatory stress amplitude and magnetic field (or mechanical stress) has been modeled. The additional deformation of a Ni–Mn–Ga specimen activated by a superimposed oscillatory stress has been computed for the case of resonant longitudinal ultrasonic waves with several realistic values of strain amplitudes using the typical values of Young’s modulus, specimen length, and threshold field/stress (i.e. the field/stress, which triggers the process of magnetically/mechanically induced deformation). Quantitative estimations show, in particular, that the ultrasonic wave with a strain amplitude of 4 × 10 −5 causes a ∼30% decrease of the threshold field/stress value; the additional deformation induced by the ultrasound reaches its maximal value ≈2.8% when the field/stress reaches the initial (i.e. observed in the absence of ultrasound) threshold value.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Ullakko · J Appl Phys · 1996 · 69 · 1966
2. O’Handley · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 471210.1063/1.373136 ↗
3. Jiang · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 81 · 281810.1063/1.1512948 ↗
4. Müllner · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 12910.1016/S1359-6462(03)00219-7 ↗
5. Seguí · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 11110.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.008 ↗
6. Vasil’ev · Physics-Uspekhi · 2003 · 46 · 55910.1070/PU2003v046n06ABEH001339 ↗
7. Kiang · JMMM · 2005 · 292 · 39410.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.481 ↗
8. Chernenko · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 134410-110.1103/PhysRevB.69.134410 ↗
9. Heczko · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 713910.1063/1.1626800 ↗
10. Müllner · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 12910.1016/S1359-6462(03)00219-7 ↗
11. Brugger · Int J Appl Electromag Mech · 2006 · 23 · 10710.3233/JAE-2006-714 ↗
12. Brugger · Int J Appl Electromag Mech · 2006 · 23 · 9910.3233/JAE-2006-722 ↗
13. Peterson · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 696310.1063/1.1667417 ↗
14. Henry · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 91 · 781010.1063/1.1449441 ↗
15. Chernenko · JMMM · 1999 · 196–197 · 85910.1016/S0304-8853(98)00980-9 ↗
16. Sapozhnikov · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 114110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00374-2 ↗
17. Sapozhnikov · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 34 · 154310.1016/1359-6462(96)00013-9 ↗
18. Lebedev · Sov Phys Solid State (Fizika Tverdogo Tela) · 1993 · 35 · 2305
19. Freidrich · Metallkd · 1969 · 60 · 390
20. Endo · Trans Japan Inst Metal · 1979 · 20 · 70610.2320/matertrans1960.20.706 ↗
21. Kozlov · Mat Sci Eng A · 1988 · 102 · 14310.1016/0025-5416(88)90568-X ↗
22. Tanibayashi · Phys Stat Sol (a) · 1991 · 128 · 8310.1002/pssa.2211280109 ↗
23. Langeneker · 1972 · 83
24. Ohgaku · Phys Stat Sol A · 1988 · 105 · 15310.1002/pssa.2211050115 ↗
25. Paul · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 31210.1063/1.1836881 ↗
26. Glavatska · JMMM · 2003 · 265 · 14210.1016/S0304-8853(03)00242-7 ↗
27. L’vov · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 71 · 02442-110.1103/PhysRevB.71.024421 ↗
28. Glavatska · JMMM · 2007 · 309 · 24410.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.007 ↗
29. Kokorin · Scripta Met Mater · 1992 · 26 · 17510.1016/0956-716X(92)90168-E ↗
30. Dai · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 695710.1063/1.1687203 ↗
31. L’vov · Int J Appl Electromag Mech · 2006 · 23 · 7510.3233/JAE-2006-721 ↗
32. Likhachev · Eur Phys J B · 2000 · 14 · 26310.1007/s100510050128 ↗