Multiscale modeling of defect formation during solid-phase epitaxy regrowth of silicon
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents a multiscale approach to understanding the defect formation during the evolution of solid-phase epitaxy regrowth in Si. A molecular dynamics (MD) simulation technique has been used to elucidate the defect formation mechanisms, as well as to determine their nature. A hybrid lattice kinetic Monte Carlo (LKMC)-finite element method (FEM) model fed by the outcome of MD was subsequently implemented. It scales up the simulation times and sizes, while reproducing the important features of the defected regrowth predicted previously. FEM calculations provide the strain pattern due to the density variation between the amorphous and crystalline phases, which is then taken into account by the LKMC model by including the effect of the strain in the rates of recrystallization. Overall, this multiscale modeling provides a physical explanation of the generation of defects and its relation with the presence of strain. The model also captures the character of formed defects. It distinguishes two types: twins formed at {111} planes and dislocations produced by the collapse of the two recrystallization fronts. Simulation results are validated by comparing them with significant experiments reported in the literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Thompson · Mater. Today · 2006 · 9 · 2010.1016/S1369-7021(06)71539-5 ↗
2. A. Medury, K. Mercha, R. Ritzenthaler, A. De Keersgieter, T. Chiarella and N. Collaert, N. Bhat, 13th International Conference on Ultimate Integration on Silicon (ULIS), 2012, p. 113.10.1109/ULIS.2012.6193370 ↗
3. Drosd · J. Appl. Phys. · 1982 · 53 · 39710.1063/1.329901 ↗
4. Burbure · Electrochem. Solid State · 2007 · 10 · H18410.1149/1.2719597 ↗
5. Saenger · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101
6. Rudawski · Scr. Mater. · 2009 · 61 · 32710.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.015 ↗
7. Olson · Mater. Sci. Rep. · 1998 · 3 · 110.1016/S0920-2307(88)80005-7 ↗
8. Custer · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1994 · 64 · 43710.1063/1.111121 ↗
9. Saenger · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101
10. Rudawski · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105
11. T. Shen, Y. Tung, Y. Cheng, D. Chiou , C. Chen, C. Wu, Y.M. Sheu, H. Tsai, C. Huang, G. Hsieh, G. Tsai, S. Fung, J. Wu, C. Diaz, in: Electron Devices Meeting, IEEE International, 2012, pp. 30.1.1–30.1.4.10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479134 ↗
12. Hughes · 1987
13. Frenkel · 2002
14. Tersoff · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39
15. Cook · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47
16. Lampin · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106
17. Mayer · 1990
18. Lampin · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109
19. Marqués · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111
20. .
21. Shin · J. Cryst. Growth · 2001 · 231 · 10710.1016/S0022-0248(01)01506-8 ↗
22. Martin-Bragado · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2013 · 184 · 270310.1016/j.cpc.2013.07.011 ↗
23. .
24. Martin-Bragado · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95
25. Martin-Bragado · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98
26. Martin-Bragado · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 18610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.036 ↗
27. Martin-Bragado · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112
28. Sklenard · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 15190710.1063/1.4802203 ↗
29. Morarka · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105
30. Morarka · J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. B · 2008 · 26 · 35710.1116/1.2823063 ↗
31. Cerva · J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 472310.1063/1.343832 ↗