journal article·2014-09

Atomic modeling to design favored compositions for the ternary Ni–Nb–Zr metallic glass formation

S.Y. Luo, J.H. Li, J.B. Liu, B.X. Liu

Acta Materialia· Volume 76
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract An interatomic potential is constructed for the Ni–Nb–Zr ternary metal system under the newly proposed long-range empirical formulism, which has been verified to be applicable for face-centered cubic, body-centered cubic and hexagonal close-packed transition metals and their alloys. Applying the constructed potential, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to study the alloy compositions favored for Ni–Nb–Zr metallic glass formation. Simulations reveal that the underlying physics of metallic glass formation is the collapse of the crystalline lattice when the solute concentration exceeds a critical value. An intrinsic glass formation region for the Ni–Nb–Zr system can then be predicted, reflecting the possible composition region energetically favored for metallic glass formation. Furthermore, an optimal composition sub-region was pinpointed within which the driving forces for the crystalline-to-amorphous transition are larger than those outside the sub-region. The Ni–Nb–Zr amorphous alloys with the optimal compositions are expected to be more stable or easier to be produced in practice. Moreover, Voronoi tessellation analysis reveals that the atomic structure of the Ni–Nb–Zr ternary metallic glass is obviously influenced by the alloy composition, the size difference and chemical interactions of constituent metals. Ni- (or Nb-centered) icosahedral clusters are inferred as the basic local structural feature in the Ni–Nb–Zr metallic glass.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Klement · Nature · 1960 · 187 · 86910.1038/187869b0 ↗
2. Johnson · MRS Bull · 1999 · 24 · 4210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
3. Chen · Acta Metall · 1974 · 22 · 150510.1016/0001-6160(74)90112-6 ↗
5. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
6. Wang · Mater Sci Eng R · 2004 · 44 · 4510.1016/j.mser.2004.03.001 ↗
7. Miller · 2007
8. Schroers · Phys Today · 2013 · 66 · 3210.1063/PT.3.1885 ↗
9. Turnbull · Contem Phys · 1969 · 10 · 47310.1080/00107516908204405 ↗
10. Egami · J Non Cryst Solids · 1984 · 64 · 11310.1016/0022-3093(84)90210-2 ↗
11. Liu · Appl Phys Lett · 1983 · 42 · 4510.1063/1.93767 ↗
12. Pan · Appl Phys Lett · 1995 · 67 · 78010.1063/1.115465 ↗
13. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 402910.1063/1.1751219 ↗
14. Lin · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 282110.1063/1.372262 ↗
15. Li · Phys Rep · 2008 · 455 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.004 ↗
16. Li · Mater Sci Eng R · 2011 · 72 · 110.1016/j.mser.2010.09.002 ↗
17. Sakurai · Precis Eng · 2011 · 35 · 53710.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.05.004 ↗
18. Kimura · Mater Trans · 2003 · 44 · 116710.2320/matertrans.44.1167 ↗
19. Zhu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 492 · 22110.1016/j.msea.2008.04.021 ↗
20. Baskes · Phys Rev Lett · 1987 · 59 · 266610.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2666 ↗
21. Finnis · Philos Mag A · 1984 · 50 · 4510.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
22. Tomanek · Phys Rev B · 1985 · 32 · 505110.1103/PhysRevB.32.5051 ↗
23. Baskes · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 272710.1103/PhysRevB.46.2727 ↗
24. Cleri · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 48 · 2210.1103/PhysRevB.48.22 ↗
25. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 62 · 856410.1103/PhysRevB.62.8564 ↗
26. Dai · J Phys Condens Matter · 2006 · 18 · 452710.1088/0953-8984/18/19/008 ↗
27. Dai · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 05210210.1103/PhysRevB.75.052102 ↗
28. Dai · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 10410110.1103/PhysRevB.75.104101 ↗
29. Dai · J Phys Condens Matter · 2009 · 21 · 38540210.1088/0953-8984/21/38/385402 ↗
30. Lide · 2004
31. Segall · J Phys Condens Matter · 2002 · 14 · 271710.1088/0953-8984/14/11/301 ↗
32. Clark · Z Kristallogr · 2005 · 220 · 56710.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
33. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
34. Liu · Mater Sci Eng R · 2000 · 29 · 110.1016/S0927-796X(00)00016-4 ↗
35. Sheng · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 47510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00374-3 ↗
36. Basu · J Alloys Compd · 2008 · 465 · 16310.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.131 ↗
37. He · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 14420610.1103/PhysRevB.64.144206 ↗
38. Cheng · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 37910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002 ↗
39. Dai · J Phys Chem B · 2009 · 113 · 728210.1021/jp900907z ↗
40. Rose · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 29 · 296310.1103/PhysRevB.29.2963 ↗
41. Lu · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 350110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00166-0 ↗
42. Lu · Intermetallics · 2007 · 15 · 61810.1016/j.intermet.2006.10.017 ↗
43. Li · Intermetallics · 2012 · 31 · 29210.1016/j.intermet.2012.05.018 ↗
44. Chang · J Alloys Compd · 2007 · 434 · 15610.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.292 ↗
45. Chen · J Alloys Compd · 2007 · 443 · 10910.1016/j.jallcom.2007.02.114 ↗
46. Yamaura · Mater Trans · 2006 · 47 · 299110.2320/matertrans.47.2991 ↗
47. Enayati · J Mater Sci · 2002 · 37 · 525510.1023/A:1021008620711 ↗
48. Yuan · Intermetallics · 2010 · 18 · 180010.1016/j.intermet.2010.01.023 ↗
49. Zhu · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 45310.1557/jmr.2007.0055 ↗
50. Li · Mater Chem Phys · 2013 · 141 · 96010.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.06.032 ↗
51. Xia · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 99 · 02610310.1063/1.2158130 ↗
52. Zhu · Adv Eng Mater · 2006 · 8 · 95310.1002/adem.200600105 ↗
53. Altounian · J Appl Phys · 1983 · 54 · 311110.1063/1.332465 ↗
54. Yamaura · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 370310.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.023 ↗
55. Paglieri · J Membr Sci · 2011 · 378 · 4210.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.049 ↗
56. Kittel · 1996
57. Wang · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 14420510.1103/PhysRevB.79.144205 ↗
58. Cheng · Phys Rev Lett · 2009 · 102 · 24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.245501 ↗
59. Oji · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 105 · 11352710.1063/1.3143039 ↗
60. Wu · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 02190110.1063/1.3464164 ↗