Effects of coherency stress and vacancy sources/sinks on interdiffusion across coherent multilayer interfaces – Part II: Interface sharpening and intermixing rate
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Vacancy-mediated interdiffusion in coherent Mo/V and Cu/Ni multilayers is simulated to evaluate the effects of coherency stress and vacancy sources/sinks on interface sharpening and the intermixing rate, using the phase field model developed in a previous paper for two limiting cases: ideal vacancy sources/sinks densely distributed or not present at all. Interface sharpening stems from a large diffusion coefficient asymmetry across the interface, which in turn originates from the large difference in vacancy formation and migration energies between the two constituent layers. Remarkable sharpening is found in Mo/V multilayers either with dense or without vacancy sources/sinks, but only in Cu/Ni with a high density of sources/sinks. Sharpening is suppressed by coherency stress in Cu/Ni regardless of the existence of vacancy sources/sinks, but only promoted in Mo/V with a high density of sources/sinks. The intermixing rate is suppressed in Mo/V by the introduction of a high density of vacancy sources/sinks that are parallel or perpendicular to the interfaces, or uniformly distributed in all orientations, but only promoted in Cu/Ni by the introduction of vacancy sources/sinks that are parallel to the interfaces. The intermixing rate is promoted in Mo/V by coherency stress regardless of the existence of vacancy sources/sinks, but promoted in Cu/Ni by coherency stress only when the vacancy sources/sinks are parallel to the interface or not present at all. The effects of that part of coherency stress induced by the mismatch in atomic volumes on interface sharpening and the intermixing rate are opposite to, but dominant over, those of the stress induced by lattice creation/annihilation in vacancy sources/sinks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Kano · Appl Phys Lett · 1993 · 63 · 283910.1063/1.110791 ↗
2. Nagamine · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 588110.1063/1.1615704 ↗
3. Li · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 11710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.032 ↗
4. Hoagland · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 77510.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.059 ↗
5. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 111710.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.049 ↗
6. Thobor · Surf Coat Technol · 2000 · 124 · 21010.1016/S0257-8972(99)00655-6 ↗
7. An · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 2006 · 39 · 171110.1088/0022-3727/39/9/001 ↗
8. Bigault · Appl Surf Sci · 2002 · 188 · 11010.1016/S0169-4332(01)00714-0 ↗
9. Cho · J Appl Phys · 1992 · 72 · 579910.1063/1.351934 ↗
10. Holmstrom · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2004 · 101 · 474210.1073/pnas.0305313101 ↗
11. Erdélyi · Science · 2004 · 306 · 191310.1126/science.1104400 ↗
12. Beke · Vacuum · 2005 · 80 · 8710.1016/j.vacuum.2005.07.044 ↗
13. Dudás · J Appl Phys · 1999 · 86 · 200810.1063/1.371001 ↗
14. Yu · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 669010.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.031 ↗
15. Erdélyi · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 89 · 16590110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.165901 ↗
16. Erdélyi · Surf Sci · 2002 · 496 · 12910.1016/S0039-6028(01)01571-0 ↗
17. Roussel · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 08540310.1103/PhysRevB.73.085403 ↗
18. Erdélyi · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 09210210.1103/PhysRevB.68.092102 ↗
19. Beke · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 387–389 · 410.1016/j.msea.2004.01.065 ↗
20. Beke · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 1998 · 527 · 9910.1557/PROC-527-99 ↗
21. Stephenson · Acta Metall · 1988 · 10 · 266310.1016/0001-6160(88)90114-9 ↗
22. Mehrer · 2007 · vol. 155
23. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 121210.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.054 ↗
24. Hirth · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 79410.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.048 ↗
25. Yu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 534810.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.033 ↗
26. Gusak · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 78510.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.035 ↗
27. Hirth · 1982
28. Siegel · J Nucl Mater · 1978 · 69–70 · 11710.1016/0022-3115(78)90240-4 ↗
29. Mey · Calphad · 1992 · 16
30. Mehrer · 1990 · vol. III/26
31. Xu · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 694110.1103/PhysRevB.54.6941 ↗
32. Pelleg · Philos Mag A · 1991 · 63 · 43910.1080/01418619108213890 ↗
33. Nguyen-Manh · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 02010110.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
34. Rao · Philos Mag A · 2000 · 80 · 201110.1080/01418610008212148 ↗
35. Liu · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 192410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.057 ↗
36. Strandlund · Metall Mater Trans A · 2006 · 37 · 178510.1007/s11661-006-0120-0 ↗
37. Hoglund · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 131110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00054-4 ↗
38. Boussinot · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 417010.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.008 ↗
39. Hu · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 187910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00118-5 ↗
40. Fischer · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 269810.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.003 ↗
41. Johnson · Metall Mater Trans A · 1997 · 28 · 2710.1007/s11661-997-0080-z ↗
42. Zhu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 124310.1016/j.msea.2009.09.058 ↗
43. Wan H, Shen Y. In preparation.
44. Bolling · Philos Mag · 1972 · 25 · 4510.1080/14786437208229214 ↗
45. Erdélyi · Philos Mag A · 1999 · 79 · 175710.1080/01418619908210390 ↗
46. Philibert · 1991
47. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 13191010.1063/1.3111137 ↗
48. Wang · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 106710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.035 ↗
49. Granroth · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 09410410.1103/PhysRevB.80.094104 ↗
50. Sutton · 1996
51. Ragone · 1995