Equilibrium thermodynamics of helium inδ-phase Pu–Ga alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The paper presents a theoretical study of the response of δ -phase Pu–Ga alloys to self-irradiation. We investigate the long-term behaviour of He atoms in the face-centred cubic (fcc) lattice under ambient conditions by means of classical molecular dynamics. Because of the relatively low diffusive mobility of He atoms in the lattice their dynamics cannot be tracked directly in molecular dynamics simulations. Instead, we use the Helmholtz free energy function to investigate the equilibrium thermodynamics of metastable microconfigurations of perfect crystals with artificially introduced He atoms in different configurations. The Helmholtz free energy of the microconfigurations are calculated using the thermodynamic integration method. Based on the free energy evaluation, inferences about the relative thermodynamic stability of various microconfigurations under ambient conditions are drawn. Estimates of the equilibrium parameters of He bubbles in the lattice and the distribution of He bubble radii are calculated and compared to those observed experimentally.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Wolfer · Los Alamos Sci · 2000 · 26 · 274
2. Hecker · 2001 · 23
3. Clark · 2006 · 979
4. Wolfer · J Alloys Compd · 2007 · 444–445 · 7210.1016/j.jallcom.2006.10.045 ↗
5. Howell · Appl Surf Sci · 1999 · 149 · 10310.1016/S0169-4332(99)00181-6 ↗
6. Wirth · Mater Res Soc Bull · 2001 · 26 · 67910.1557/mrs2001.177 ↗
7. Valone · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 21420910.1103/PhysRevB.73.214209 ↗
8. Dremov · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 77 · 22430610.1103/PhysRevB.77.224306 ↗
9. Rohr · J Nucl Mater · 1987 · 144 · 20210.1016/0022-3115(87)90297-2 ↗
10. Zocco · 1988 · vol. 11
11. Moore · J Nucl Mater · 2002 · 306 · 21310.1016/S0022-3115(02)01319-3 ↗
12. Martz · J Metals · 2003 · 55 · 19
13. Zocco · J Metals · 2003 · 55 · 24
14. Schwartz · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 47910.1080/02678370412331320026 ↗
15. Moore · Micron · 2010 · 41 · 33610.1016/j.micron.2009.12.006 ↗
16. Jeffries · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 410 · 8410.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.015 ↗
17. Schroeder · J Nucl Mater · 1991 · 179–181 · 100710.1016/0022-3115(91)90261-5 ↗
18. Baldan · J Mater Sci · 2002 · 37 · 217110.1023/A:1015388912729 ↗
19. Gruber · J Appl Phys · 1967 · 38 · 24310.1063/1.1708962 ↗
20. Baskes · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 01412910.1103/PhysRevB.72.014129 ↗
21. Dremov · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 385 · 7910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.10.037 ↗
22. Frenkel · J Chem Phys · 1984 · 81 · 318810.1063/1.448024 ↗
23. Frenkel · 1986 · XCVII
24. Frenkel · 2002
25. Dremov · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 414 · 47110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.038 ↗
26. Nose · J Chem Phys · 1984 · 81 · 51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
27. Hoover · Phys Rev A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
28. Arsenlis · J Nucl Mater · 2005 · 336 · 3110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.08.017 ↗
29. Robbins · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 324 · 12510.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.011 ↗