Experimental tests of stereological estimates of grain boundary populations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present experimental validation of a method for estimating three-dimensional (3-D) relative numerical populations of grain boundaries from measurements of individual two-dimensional (2-D) cross-sections. Such numerical populations are relevant to network topology and the modeling of intergranular failure modes in grain boundary engineered materials, and are distinct from geometrical population measures such as area per volume. We examine 3-D reconstructions of stainless steel and copper, with varying populations of twin-related boundaries, generated by serial-section electron backscatter diffraction and high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy. We show that 2-D length fractions, 2-D number fractions and 3-D number fractions are all distinct quantities when grain boundary type is correlated with grain boundary size. We also demonstrate that the last quantity may be reliably inferred from the first two, provided the experimental spatial resolution is much finer than the grain size, eliminating the need to use 3-D experimental methods to access at least some information about 3-D network properties. Many of the Σ3 boundaries are extremely complex, with highly re-entrant shapes that can intersect a sample plane many times, giving a false impression of multiple separate boundaries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Groeber M, Haley B, Uchic M, Ghosh S. Mater Process Design: Model Simulat Appl – Pts 1 and 2 2004;712:1712.
2. Lee SB, Rollett AD, Rohrer GS. Recrystal Grain Growth III – Pts 1 and 2 2007;558–559:915.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.558-559.915 ↗
3. Zaefferer · Metall Mater Trans A · 2008 · 39A · 37410.1007/s11661-007-9418-9 ↗
4. Uchic · JOM · 2011 · 63 · 2510.1007/s11837-011-0041-2 ↗
5. Rollett · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2007 · 37 · 62710.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084401 ↗
6. Rohrer · Mater Sci Tech – Lond · 2010 · 26 · 66110.1179/026708309X12468927349370 ↗
7. Liu · Ultramicroscopy · 2005 · 103 · 19910.1016/j.ultramic.2004.11.022 ↗
8. Poulsen · J Appl Crystallogr · 2001 · 34 · 75110.1107/S0021889801014273 ↗
9. Suter · Rev Sci Instrum · 2006 · 77 · 12390510.1063/1.2400017 ↗
10. Zaafarani · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 186310.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.014 ↗
11. Cayron · Mater Charact · 2006 · 57 · 38610.1016/j.matchar.2006.03.008 ↗
12. Thornton · MRS Bull · 2008 · 33 · 58710.1557/mrs2008.123 ↗
13. Gertsman · Z Metallkd · 2005 · 96 · 110610.3139/146.101147 ↗
14. Underwood · 1970
15. Mayhew · J Anat · 1979 · 129 · 95
16. Russ · 2000
17. Bunge · Adv Eng Mater · 2001 · 3 · 2510.1002/1527-2648(200101)3:1/2<25::AID-ADEM25>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
18. Khorashadizadeh · Adv Eng Mater · 2011 · 13 · 23710.1002/adem.201000259 ↗
19. Groeber · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 125710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041 ↗
20. Frary · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 20510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.008 ↗
21. Sterio · J Microsc – Oxford · 1984 · 134 · 12710.1111/j.1365-2818.1984.tb02501.x ↗
22. Watanabe · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 417110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00275-X ↗
23. Tsurekawa S, Watanabe T, Tamari N. Adv Fract Failure Prevent – Pts 1 and 2 2004;261–263:999.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.261-263.999 ↗
24. Was · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2004 · 819 · 8710.1557/PROC-819-N2.1 ↗
25. Schwartz · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 96310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.052 ↗
26. Bechtle · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 414810.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.012 ↗
27. Gertsman · Acta Crystallogr A · 2001 · 57 · 64910.1107/S0108767301009102 ↗
28. Schuh · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 71110.1080/0141861021000056681 ↗
29. Frary · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 13411510.1103/PhysRevB.69.134115 ↗
30. Schuh CA
31. Morawiec · J Appl Crystallogr · 2009 · 42 · 78310.1107/S0021889809025461 ↗
32. Hall · Proc Phys Soc Lond Sect B · 1951 · 64 · 74710.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
33. Kim · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 100510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.071 ↗
34. Saylor · Metall Mater Trans A · 2004 · 35A · 198110.1007/s11661-004-0147-z ↗
35. Larsen · Metall Mater Trans A · 2004 · 35A · 199110.1007/s11661-004-0148-y ↗
36. Reed · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 327810.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.019 ↗
37. Reed · MRS Proc · 2004 · 819 · 28310.1557/PROC-819-N7.6 ↗
38. Randle · Metall Mater Trans A · 2011 · 42A · 58210.1007/s11661-010-0302-7 ↗
39. Blobaum · MRS Proc · 2004 · 819 · 5110.1557/PROC-819-N3.27 ↗
40. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 259910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3 ↗
41. Henrie AJM. PhD Thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; 2004, p. 79.
42. Brandon · Acta Metall · 1966 · 14 · 147910.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
43. Lejcek · Mater Sci Tech – Lond · 2005 · 21 · 39310.1179/174328405X39716 ↗
44. Randle · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 101110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.050 ↗
45. Smith · Trans Am Inst Min Metall Eng · 1948 · 175 · 15
46. Rohrer · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 506310.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.042 ↗
47. Reed · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 102910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.045 ↗