Quasicontinuum study of the shear behavior of defective tilt grain boundaries in Cu
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Atomistic simulations using the quasicontinuum method are used to study the role of vacancy defects and angstrom-scale voids on the mechanical behavior of five tilt bicrystals containing grain boundaries (GBs) that have been predicted to exhibit characteristic deformation processes of nanocrystalline and nanotwinned metals: GB-mediated dislocation emission, interface sliding and shear-coupled GB migration. We demonstrate that such nanoscale defects have a profound impact on interfacial shear strength and underlying deformation mechanisms in copper GBs due to void-induced local stresses. In asymmetric high- and low-angle GBs, we find that voids become preferential sites for dislocation nucleation when the void size exceeds 4 A. In symmetric Σ 9 ( 221 ) GBs prone to sliding, voids are shown to shield the local shear stress, which considerably reduces the extent of atom shuffling at the interface. In symmetric Σ 5 ( 210 ) and Σ 27 ( 115 ) GBs, we find that the effect of voids on shear-coupled GB migration depends on the GB tilt direction considered, as well as on the size and number of voids. Remarkably, large voids can completely abate the GB migration process in Σ 27 ( 115 ) GBs. For all GB types, the interfacial shear strength is shown to decrease linearly as the volume fraction of voids at the interface increases; however, this study also suggests that this decrease is much more pronounced in GBs deforming by sliding than by dislocation nucleation or migration, owing to larger void-induced stresses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Li · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 23010.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.020 ↗
2. Donovan · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 110.1016/0001-6160(83)90057-3 ↗
3. Li · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 144201-1
4. Sansoz · Mater Sci Eng C · 2007 · 27 · 150910.1016/j.msec.2006.07.019 ↗
5. Sansoz · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 8910.1063/1.2352725 ↗
6. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 495310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
7. Gianola · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 225310.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.023 ↗
8. Legros · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 338010.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.032 ↗
9. Rupert · Science · 2009 · 326 · 168610.1126/science.1178226 ↗
10. Dupont · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 601310.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.014 ↗
11. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 2210.1103/PhysRevB.60.22 ↗
12. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 38710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00421-4 ↗
13. Schiøtz · Science · 2003 · 30110.1126/science.1086636 ↗
14. Sansoz · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 224101-110.1103/PhysRevB.83.224101 ↗
15. Schiøtz · Nature · 1998 · 39110.1038/35328 ↗
16. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 6410.1103/PhysRevB.64.224105 ↗
17. Sansoz · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 113610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.028 ↗
18. LaGrange · Appl Phys Lett · 2013 · 102 · 011905-110.1063/1.4772589 ↗
19. Wang · Nat Mater · 2013 · 12 · 69710.1038/nmat3646 ↗
20. Frøseth · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 484710.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.032 ↗
21. Strachan · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63
22. Rudd · Comput Mater Sci · 2002 · 24 · 14810.1016/S0927-0256(02)00181-7 ↗
23. Wu · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 12 · 22510.1088/0965-0393/12/2/004 ↗
24. Yang · Comput Mater Sci · 2006 · 40 · 5110.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.022 ↗
25. Changwen · J Mech Phys Solids · 2011 · 59 · 185810.1016/j.jmps.2011.05.008 ↗
26. Frolov · Nat Commun · 2013
27. Shenoy · J Mech Phys Solids · 1999 · 47 · 61110.1016/S0022-5096(98)00051-9 ↗
28. Miller · J Comput Aided Mater Des · 2002 · 9 · 20310.1023/A:1026098010127 ↗
29. Sansoz · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 128310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.031 ↗
30. Sansoz · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 193110.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.007 ↗
31. Péron-Lührs · J Mech Phys Solids · 2013 · 61 · 189510.1016/j.jmps.2013.04.009 ↗
32. Marian · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 289310.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.046 ↗
33. Milas · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 109 · 033518-110.1063/1.3544366 ↗
34. Spearot · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 70510.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.060 ↗
35. Shan · J Mater Res · 2013 · 28 · 76610.1557/jmr.2012.424 ↗
36. Shao · Chin Phys B · 2012 · 21
37. King · Science · 2008 · 321 · 38210.1126/science.1156211 ↗
38. Arafin · Corr Sci · 2009 · 51 · 11910.1016/j.corsci.2008.10.006 ↗
39. Brewer · Microsc Microanal · 2006 · 12 · 8510.1017/S1431927606060120 ↗
40. Shigematsu · J Microsc · 2006 · 224 · 30610.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01697.x ↗
41. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
42. Daw · Mater Sci Reports · 1992 · 9 · 25110.1016/0920-2307(93)90001-U ↗
43. Horstemeyer · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 1110.1088/0965-0393/11/3/301 ↗
44. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 60 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
45. You · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 21710.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.052 ↗
46. Huang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 65510.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.002 ↗
47. Li · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96
48. Thomas · Scripta Metall Mater · 1990 · 24 · 20110.1016/0956-716X(90)90592-5 ↗
49. Kung · Adv Mater Twenty-First Cent · 1999 · 455
50. Szefer · Bull Polish Acad Sci Tech Sci · 2009 · 57
51. Cleri · Phys Rev Lett · 1997 · 7910.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1309 ↗