journal article·2009-06

Do substitutional solutes soften or embrittle cracktips in α-Fe?

Peter A. Gordon, T. Neeraj

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

We employ atomistic modeling to examine the influence substitutional solutes have on the activated process of nucleating dislocations from cracktips in α-Fe. We demonstrate a strong correspondence between the energy landscape of the solute during an idealized block-like sliding process and the influence on the activation energy barrier for dislocation emission near a idealized cracktip. Using a series of solute potentials developed with input from ab initio calculations, these models predict that Cu and Ni both lower the activation energy barriers for emission, while solutes such as Mo and W raise the barriers. For solutes that raise or lower the emission barriers, the implications on the overall nucleation frequency turns out to be very different.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Hribernik ML. PhD thesis. University of California Santa Barbara; 2006.
2. Zielinksi · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 286110.1016/0956-7151(92)90451-J ↗
3. Qiao · Mech Mater · 2003 · 35 · 90310.1016/S0167-6636(02)00293-4 ↗
4. Joseph · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 367–370 · 63710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.077 ↗
5. Gordon · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 16 · 04500610.1088/0965-0393/16/4/045006 ↗
6. Gordon · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 02500510.1088/0965-0393/17/2/025005 ↗
7. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
8. Shastry · Philos Mag A · 1997 · 75 · 77110.1080/01418619708207201 ↗
9. Farkas · J Mater Res · 1997 · 12 · 9310.1557/JMR.1997.0015 ↗
10. Hoagland · Philos Mag A · 1997 · 76 · 54310.1080/01418619708214022 ↗
11. Gordon · Metall Mater Trans A · 2006 · 38 · 2002
12. Yun · Radiat Eff Defect Solids · 2007 · 162 · 36710.1080/10420150701197315 ↗
13. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 025503-1
14. Vitek · Philos Mag · 1968 · 18 · 77310.1080/14786436808227500 ↗
15. Ogata · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 71 · 22410210.1103/PhysRevB.71.224102 ↗
16. Machova · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1999 · 7 · 94910.1088/0965-0393/7/6/304 ↗
17. Simonelli · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 1993 · 291 · 56710.1557/PROC-291-567 ↗
18. Hirth · 1982
19. Kresse · Comp Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
20. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
21. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
22. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
23. Murnaghan · Proc Nat Acad Sci · 1944 · 30 · 24410.1073/pnas.30.9.244 ↗
24. Mehl · 1995 · vol. I · 195
25. Clatterbuck · Acta Materialia · 2003 · 51 · 227110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00033-8 ↗
26. Domain · J Nucl Mater · 2006 · 351 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.025 ↗
27. Koo · Int J Offshore Polar Eng · 2004 · 14 · 2
28. Rice · J Mech Phys Sol · 1994 · 42 · 33310.1016/0022-5096(94)90013-2 ↗
29. Tadmor · J Mech Phys Solids · 2003 · 51 · 76510.1016/S0022-5096(03)00005-X ↗
30. Warner · Nature Mater · 2007 · 6 · 87610.1038/nmat2030 ↗